Incautación de bienes: Oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia

Los autores estudian las cuestiones procesales, organizativas y tácticas relacionadas con la incautación de bienes para superar la oposición a la investigación y la ejecución de la sentencia. La relevancia de este artículo se confirma por el hecho de que en las últimas décadas, el sistema de formas...

Full description

Autores:: Ivanov, Dmitriy Aleksandrovich
Tishutina, Inna Valerievna
Dyablova, Yulia Lvovna
Artemova, Valeriia Valerievna
Khmelev, Sergey Alexandrovich

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Corporación Universidad de la Costa

Repositorio:: REDICUC - Repositorio CUC

Idioma:: eng

id	RCUC2_4391e6d6fbec370aaa70ed5f1143c7e0
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/12555
network_acronym_str	RCUC2
network_name_str	REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Incautación de bienes: Oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Seizure of property: Counteraction to the investigation of crimes and the execution of a sentence
title	Incautación de bienes: Oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia
spellingShingle	Incautación de bienes: Oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia seizure of property measures of procedural coercion counteraction to the investigation of crimes counteraction to the execution of a sentence incautación de bienes medidas de coerción procesal oposición a la investigación de delitos oposición a la ejecución de la sentencia
title_short	Incautación de bienes: Oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia
title_full	Incautación de bienes: Oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia
title_fullStr	Incautación de bienes: Oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia
title_full_unstemmed	Incautación de bienes: Oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia
title_sort	Incautación de bienes: Oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Ivanov, Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Tishutina, Inna Valerievna Dyablova, Yulia Lvovna Artemova, Valeriia Valerievna Khmelev, Sergey Alexandrovich
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Ivanov, Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Tishutina, Inna Valerievna Dyablova, Yulia Lvovna Artemova, Valeriia Valerievna Khmelev, Sergey Alexandrovich
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	seizure of property measures of procedural coercion counteraction to the investigation of crimes counteraction to the execution of a sentence
topic	seizure of property measures of procedural coercion counteraction to the investigation of crimes counteraction to the execution of a sentence incautación de bienes medidas de coerción procesal oposición a la investigación de delitos oposición a la ejecución de la sentencia
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	incautación de bienes medidas de coerción procesal oposición a la investigación de delitos oposición a la ejecución de la sentencia
description	Los autores estudian las cuestiones procesales, organizativas y tácticas relacionadas con la incautación de bienes para superar la oposición a la investigación y la ejecución de la sentencia. La relevancia de este artículo se confirma por el hecho de que en las últimas décadas, el sistema de formas y métodos de dicha oposición a favor de los sospechosos, acusados y otras personas tiende a expandirse, y cualquier laguna en la regulación procesal o en el apoyo organizativo y táctico para la investigación de los delitos se utiliza con fines delictivos. Además, los autores, considerando la incautación de bienes como un medio para superar la oposición a la investigación y ejecución de la sentencia, ofrecen recomendaciones destinadas a minimizarla. El artículo afirma que el fundamento de la incautación de bienes implica un conjunto de pruebas conducentes a indicar que un delito ha causado un daño determinado, o que un sospechoso o acusado ha cometido un acto que prevé la posibilidad de aplicación de sanciones patrimoniales. A partir de los resultados obtenidos, los autores concluyen que la incautación de bienes tiene un carácter preventivo y cautelar, que consiste en suprimir la intención del sospechoso (acusado) dirigida a ocultar, vender o enajenar ilegalmente bienes, dinero, valores y otros objetos de valor con el fin de evitar la incautación de estos objetos.
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-08-20 00:00:00 2024-04-09T20:26:42Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-08-20 00:00:00 2024-04-09T20:26:42Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021-08-20
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	1692-3030
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12555
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.09
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.09
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2389-7716
identifier_str_mv	1692-3030 10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.09 2389-7716
url	https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12555 https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.09
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista Jurídicas CUC
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	Arshba, G. V. (2004). Seizure of property: Training manual. [Dissertation]. Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Moscow. Available: https://lawtheses.com/nalozhenie-aresta-na-imuschestvo-v-ugolovnom-sudoproizvodstve Basedeo, V. (2009). The Constitutional Validity of Search and Seizure Powers in South African Criminal Procedure. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 12(4), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i4a2747 Buldakova, V. K. (2015). The role of the investigator (interrogator) in ensuring compensation for harm caused by the crime. Bulletin of the Tyumen Institute for Advanced Studies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 1(4), 79–85. Available from https://mvd.ru/upload/site151/doc/arhiv/Vestnik_TIPK_MVD14_2015.pdf Björn, G. [Ed.] (2012). Criminal Procedure Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. 2 ed. Moscow: Prospect. Ionov, V. A. (2010). Seizure of property in the course of preliminary investigation in criminal cases of economic crimes. [Thesis degree]. Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Novgorod, Russia. Available: https://www.iuaj.net/node/385 Ivanov, A. N. & Lapin, E. S. (2007). Seizure of property in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Yurlitinform. Kelly, B. D. (2015). Further Results Concerning the Effects of Asset Forfeiture on Policing. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2647629 Kochan, D. J. (1998). Reforming Property Forfeiture Laws to Protect Citizens’ Rights: Why and How to Curtail Abuses of Laws that Permit Private Property Seizures. [Research Paper No. 08-04]. Orange: Mackinac Center for Public Policy Report/Chapman University Law. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=928737 Kokoreva, L. V. & Lavrova, O. N. (2016). Seizure of property. The procedure for assessing the property located in the home of the suspect, the accused, immediately at the time of the investigative action: guidelines. Staroteryaevo: Moscow Regional Branch of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V.Ya. Kovriga, Z. F. & Lyutikov, N. E. (1975). Criminal procedural compulsion. Voronezh: Voronezh State University. Nguyen, V. T., Pushkarev, V. V., Tokareva, E. V., Makeev, A. V. & Shepeleva, O. R. (2021). Compensation for Damage Caused by a Crime in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the Russian Federation. Jurnal Cita Hukum-Indonesian Law Journal, 9(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i2.21738 Pushkarev, V. V., Artemova, V. V., Ermakov, S. V., Alimamedov, E. N. & Popenkov, A. V. (2020). Criminal prosecution of persons, who committed criminal, acts using the сryptocurrency in the Russian Federation. Revista San Gregorio, 42, 330–335. Available: https://revista.sangregorio.edu.ec/index.php/REVISTASANGREGORIO/article/view/1566 Pushkarev, V. V., Poselskaya, L. N., Skachko, A. V., Tarasov, A. V. & Mutalieva, L. S. (2021). Criminal Prosecution of Persons Who Have Committed Crimes in The Banking Sector. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(69), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.25 Pustovaya, I. N. (2012). Seizure of property as a means of securing a civil claim. Socium and Power, 6(38), 72–76. Available from http://siv74.ru/images/downloads/arhiv-nomerov/2012/6_2012.pdf Republic of Azerbaijan. (July 14, 2000). Code of Criminal Procedure of the Azerbaijan Republic. [Law No. 907-IQ]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/43/Azerbaijan/show Republic of Kazakhstan. (July 4, 2014). Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. [Law No. 231-V]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/21/Italy/show R. F. State Duma. (November 22, 2001). The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. [УПК РФ]. No. 174-FZ. Available: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901802257 R. F. State Duma. (June 13, 1996). The Criminal Code of The Russian Federation. [УК РФ]. No. 63-FZ. Available: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/9017477 R.F. Ministry of Internal Affairs. Department of Internal Affairs for Central Administrative District. Investigation Department. (2018). Materials of the criminal. [Case No. 267912]. R.F. Ministry of Internal Affairs. Department of Internal Affairs for Central Administrative District. Investigation Department. (2017). Materials of the criminal. [Case No. 362927]. R. F. Ministry of Internal Affairs. Department of Internal Affairs for Central Administrative District. Investigation Department. (2014). Materials of the criminal. [Case No. 749254]. Tutynin, I. B. (2005). Seizure of property as a measure of criminal procedural compulsion. [Dissertation thesis]. Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. Available: https://www.dissercat.com/content/nalozhenie-aresta-na-imushchestvo-kak-mera-ugolovno-protsessualnogo-prinuzhdeniya Vdovtsev, P. V. & Karkoshko, Yu. S. (2015). Seizure of property in criminal cases in the light of the positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Investigation of crimes: problems and solutions, 1(7), 69–70. Available: http://www.unity-dana.ru/magazines/rassledovanie-prestupleniy-problemy-i-puti-ikh-resheniya-sbornik-nauchno-prakticheskikh-trudov/ Yutkina, S. M. & Rostovshchikova, O. V. (2012). On the seizure of property as a measure of criminal procedural compulsion: history, theory, practice. Bulletin of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 4(23), 144–156. Available: http://va-mvd.ru/vestnik/arhiv/23.pdf
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	199–216
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	199–216
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	1
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	18
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3535/3936 https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3535/3953 https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3535/3954 https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3535/3955
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 1 , Año 2022 : Jurídicas CUC 2022
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv	JURÍDICAS CUC - 2022
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	JURÍDICAS CUC - 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	application/pdf text/html application/xml application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/3535
institution	Corporación Universidad de la Costa
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/12555/1/ORE.xml
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	3beee725876a5df10e2329a48f2b5739
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Universidad de La Costa
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repdigital@cuc.edu.co
_version_	1808400028911271936
spelling	Ivanov, Dmitriy Aleksandrovichf4f5f999ca3d6f3aadeb377bf1625c3e300Tishutina, Inna Valerievna40e035d20919fdd78fc6fd0cf67dc72e300Dyablova, Yulia Lvovnaf75bf070f7ebf004122e37d507e39a78300Artemova, Valeriia Valerievnae0ac3be626053c0384fee664ac807f99300Khmelev, Sergey Alexandrovich98951ebc943c9e4cb5876eb6ec7eefb03002021-08-20 00:00:002024-04-09T20:26:42Z2021-08-20 00:00:002024-04-09T20:26:42Z2021-08-201692-3030https://hdl.handle.net/11323/12555https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.0910.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.092389-7716Los autores estudian las cuestiones procesales, organizativas y tácticas relacionadas con la incautación de bienes para superar la oposición a la investigación y la ejecución de la sentencia. La relevancia de este artículo se confirma por el hecho de que en las últimas décadas, el sistema de formas y métodos de dicha oposición a favor de los sospechosos, acusados y otras personas tiende a expandirse, y cualquier laguna en la regulación procesal o en el apoyo organizativo y táctico para la investigación de los delitos se utiliza con fines delictivos. Además, los autores, considerando la incautación de bienes como un medio para superar la oposición a la investigación y ejecución de la sentencia, ofrecen recomendaciones destinadas a minimizarla. El artículo afirma que el fundamento de la incautación de bienes implica un conjunto de pruebas conducentes a indicar que un delito ha causado un daño determinado, o que un sospechoso o acusado ha cometido un acto que prevé la posibilidad de aplicación de sanciones patrimoniales. A partir de los resultados obtenidos, los autores concluyen que la incautación de bienes tiene un carácter preventivo y cautelar, que consiste en suprimir la intención del sospechoso (acusado) dirigida a ocultar, vender o enajenar ilegalmente bienes, dinero, valores y otros objetos de valor con el fin de evitar la incautación de estos objetos.The authors study the procedural, organizational, and tactical issues related to the seizure of property in order to overcome the counteraction to the investigation and execution of the sentence. The relevance of this article is confirmed by the fact that in recent decades, the system of forms and methods of such counteraction on behalf of suspects, accused, and other persons tends to expand, and any gap in the procedural regulation or organizational and tactical support for the investigation of crimes is used for criminal purposes. Moreover, the authors, considering the seizure of property as a means of overcoming the opposition to the investigation and execution of the sentence, offer recommendations aimed at minimizing it. The article states that the actual basis for the seizure of property is a set of evidence indicating that a crime has caused determined harm, or that a suspect or accused has committed an act that provides for the possibility of applying property penalties. Based on the results obtained, the authors conclude that the seizure of property has a preventive and interim nature, which is suppressing the intent of the suspect (accused) aimed at concealing, selling, or other illegally alienating property, money, securities, and other valuables in order to avoid the seizure of these objects.application/pdftext/htmlapplication/xmlapplication/epub+zipengUniversidad de la CostaJURÍDICAS CUC - 2022https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/3535seizure of propertymeasures of procedural coercioncounteraction to the investigation of crimescounteraction to the execution of a sentenceincautación de bienesmedidas de coerción procesaloposición a la investigación de delitosoposición a la ejecución de la sentenciaIncautación de bienes: Oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentenciaSeizure of property: Counteraction to the investigation of crimes and the execution of a sentenceArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Revista Jurídicas CUCArshba, G. V. (2004). Seizure of property: Training manual. [Dissertation]. Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Moscow. Available: https://lawtheses.com/nalozhenie-aresta-na-imuschestvo-v-ugolovnom-sudoproizvodstveBasedeo, V. (2009). The Constitutional Validity of Search and Seizure Powers in South African Criminal Procedure. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 12(4), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i4a2747Buldakova, V. K. (2015). The role of the investigator (interrogator) in ensuring compensation for harm caused by the crime. Bulletin of the Tyumen Institute for Advanced Studies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 1(4), 79–85. Available from https://mvd.ru/upload/site151/doc/arhiv/Vestnik_TIPK_MVD14_2015.pdfBjörn, G. [Ed.] (2012). Criminal Procedure Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. 2 ed. Moscow: Prospect.Ionov, V. A. (2010). Seizure of property in the course of preliminary investigation in criminal cases of economic crimes. [Thesis degree]. Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Novgorod, Russia. Available: https://www.iuaj.net/node/385Ivanov, A. N. & Lapin, E. S. (2007). Seizure of property in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Yurlitinform.Kelly, B. D. (2015). Further Results Concerning the Effects of Asset Forfeiture on Policing. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2647629Kochan, D. J. (1998). Reforming Property Forfeiture Laws to Protect Citizens’ Rights: Why and How to Curtail Abuses of Laws that Permit Private Property Seizures. [Research Paper No. 08-04]. Orange: Mackinac Center for Public Policy Report/Chapman University Law. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=928737Kokoreva, L. V. & Lavrova, O. N. (2016). Seizure of property. The procedure for assessing the property located in the home of the suspect, the accused, immediately at the time of the investigative action: guidelines. Staroteryaevo: Moscow Regional Branch of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V.Ya.Kovriga, Z. F. & Lyutikov, N. E. (1975). Criminal procedural compulsion. Voronezh: Voronezh State University.Nguyen, V. T., Pushkarev, V. V., Tokareva, E. V., Makeev, A. V. & Shepeleva, O. R. (2021). Compensation for Damage Caused by a Crime in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the Russian Federation. Jurnal Cita Hukum-Indonesian Law Journal, 9(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i2.21738Pushkarev, V. V., Artemova, V. V., Ermakov, S. V., Alimamedov, E. N. & Popenkov, A. V. (2020). Criminal prosecution of persons, who committed criminal, acts using the сryptocurrency in the Russian Federation. Revista San Gregorio, 42, 330–335. Available: https://revista.sangregorio.edu.ec/index.php/REVISTASANGREGORIO/article/view/1566Pushkarev, V. V., Poselskaya, L. N., Skachko, A. V., Tarasov, A. V. & Mutalieva, L. S. (2021). Criminal Prosecution of Persons Who Have Committed Crimes in The Banking Sector. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(69), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.25Pustovaya, I. N. (2012). Seizure of property as a means of securing a civil claim. Socium and Power, 6(38), 72–76. Available from http://siv74.ru/images/downloads/arhiv-nomerov/2012/6_2012.pdfRepublic of Azerbaijan. (July 14, 2000). Code of Criminal Procedure of the Azerbaijan Republic. [Law No. 907-IQ]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/43/Azerbaijan/showRepublic of Kazakhstan. (July 4, 2014). Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. [Law No. 231-V]. Available: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/21/Italy/showR. F. State Duma. (November 22, 2001). The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. [УПК РФ]. No. 174-FZ. Available: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901802257R. F. State Duma. (June 13, 1996). The Criminal Code of The Russian Federation. [УК РФ]. No. 63-FZ. Available: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/9017477R.F. Ministry of Internal Affairs. Department of Internal Affairs for Central Administrative District. Investigation Department. (2018). Materials of the criminal. [Case No. 267912].R.F. Ministry of Internal Affairs. Department of Internal Affairs for Central Administrative District. Investigation Department. (2017). Materials of the criminal. [Case No. 362927].R. F. Ministry of Internal Affairs. Department of Internal Affairs for Central Administrative District. Investigation Department. (2014). Materials of the criminal. [Case No. 749254].Tutynin, I. B. (2005). Seizure of property as a measure of criminal procedural compulsion. [Dissertation thesis]. Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. Available: https://www.dissercat.com/content/nalozhenie-aresta-na-imushchestvo-kak-mera-ugolovno-protsessualnogo-prinuzhdeniyaVdovtsev, P. V. & Karkoshko, Yu. S. (2015). Seizure of property in criminal cases in the light of the positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Investigation of crimes: problems and solutions, 1(7), 69–70. Available: http://www.unity-dana.ru/magazines/rassledovanie-prestupleniy-problemy-i-puti-ikh-resheniya-sbornik-nauchno-prakticheskikh-trudov/Yutkina, S. M. & Rostovshchikova, O. V. (2012). On the seizure of property as a measure of criminal procedural compulsion: history, theory, practice. Bulletin of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 4(23), 144–156. Available: http://va-mvd.ru/vestnik/arhiv/23.pdf199–216199–216118https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3535/3936https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3535/3953https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3535/3954https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/download/3535/3955Núm. 1 , Año 2022 : Jurídicas CUC 2022OREORE.xmltext/xml2822https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/12555/1/ORE.xml3beee725876a5df10e2329a48f2b5739MD51open access11323/12555oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/125552024-04-09 15:26:42.874An error occurred on the license name.\|\|\|https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad de La Costarepdigital@cuc.edu.co

Incautación de bienes: Oposición a la investigación de delitos y a la ejecución de la sentencia

Publicaciones similares