Analysis of patterns in the university world rankings webometrics, Shanghai, QS and SIR-SCimago: case Latin America

The internationalization and positioning of universities offers relative comparisons, studied according to different teaching and research criteria. Among the recognized rankings are the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) or Ranking of Shanghai, QS World University Ranking, SCimago Instit...

Full description

Autores:
Torres Samuel, Maritza
Vásquez, Carmen
Viloria Silva, Amelec Jesus
Varela Izquierdo, Noel
Hernández Fernández, Lissette
Portillo Medina, Rafael
Tipo de recurso:
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_f744
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositorio:
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/1843
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/1843
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
QS
Ranking university
SCimago
Shanghai
Webometrics
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución – No comercial – Compartir igual
Description
Summary:The internationalization and positioning of universities offers relative comparisons, studied according to different teaching and research criteria. Among the recognized rankings are the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) or Ranking of Shanghai, QS World University Ranking, SCimago Institutions Rankings SIR and the Web Ranking of Universities-Webometrics. Comparatively, characteristics of each one are presented in terms of scope, volume of universities positioned and evaluation criteria. The indicators associated with research and institutional capacity stand out as common criteria in the revised evaluation methodologies. Regarding Latin America, Brazil leads with its presence in the four rankings. There is a greater number of Latin American universities in QS (40%) and Webometrics (31%), in the other two rankings it does not exceed 8%.