Construction and demolition waste recycling through conventional jig, air jig, and sensor-based sorting: a comparison
The paper presents a comparison of the concentration methods conventional jig, air jig, and sensor-based sorting to treat construction and demolition waste. All tests were made with concrete, brick, and gypsum particles and the tests aim to separate these materials into different size ranges, depend...
- Autores:
-
Hoffmann Sampaio, Carlos
Ambrós, Weslei
CAZACLIU, Bogdan
Oliva, Josep
Veras, Moacir
Miltzarek, Gérson Luis
Silva Oliveira, Luis Felipe
Salvador Kuerten, Ariane
Liendo, Maria Alejandra
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Corporación Universidad de la Costa
- Repositorio:
- REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/8995
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/11323/8995
https://doi.org/10.3390/min11080904
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Construction and demolition waste
Sensor-based sorting
Wet jig
Air
Jig
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- CC0 1.0 Universal
Summary: | The paper presents a comparison of the concentration methods conventional jig, air jig, and sensor-based sorting to treat construction and demolition waste. All tests were made with concrete, brick, and gypsum particles and the tests aim to separate these materials into different size ranges, depending on the method. The equipment tested, conventional jig, air jig, and sensor-based sorting present good results to concentrate construction and demolition waste particles, with different concentrations and mass recoveries. The results show particularly good mass recoveries and particle concentration for conventional jig, especially for concrete and gypsum particles. Sensor-based sorting should preferably use concentration circuits for best results. |
---|