Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017
The work aims to describe the main bibliographic characteristics of world scientific production related to sustainability and environmental accounting (hereinafter CA) in the fields of administration, business and accounting, based on a descriptive analysis of the quantitative evolution of publicati...
- Autores:
-
Fuentes Doria, Deivi David
Toscano-Hernández, Anibal
Murillo Vanegas, Valentina
Pérez Vásquez, Manuel Antonio
Jiménez Díaz, Alex
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Corporación Universidad de la Costa
- Repositorio:
- REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/6307
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/11323/6307
https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.2
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Bibliometric análisis
Sustainability
Environmental accounting
Análisis bibliométrico
Sostenibilidad
Contabilidad ambiental
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- CC0 1.0 Universal
id |
RCUC2_1ffabc2bceac8b511cb6b6fb08fe6cab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/6307 |
network_acronym_str |
RCUC2 |
network_name_str |
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017 |
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Sustainability and environmental accounting: Bibliometric analysis and documentary review of scientific research in the 2013-2017 period |
title |
Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017 |
spellingShingle |
Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017 Bibliometric análisis Sustainability Environmental accounting Análisis bibliométrico Sostenibilidad Contabilidad ambiental |
title_short |
Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017 |
title_full |
Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017 |
title_fullStr |
Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017 |
title_sort |
Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017 |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Fuentes Doria, Deivi David Toscano-Hernández, Anibal Murillo Vanegas, Valentina Pérez Vásquez, Manuel Antonio Jiménez Díaz, Alex |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Fuentes Doria, Deivi David Toscano-Hernández, Anibal Murillo Vanegas, Valentina Pérez Vásquez, Manuel Antonio Jiménez Díaz, Alex |
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bibliometric análisis Sustainability Environmental accounting Análisis bibliométrico Sostenibilidad Contabilidad ambiental |
topic |
Bibliometric análisis Sustainability Environmental accounting Análisis bibliométrico Sostenibilidad Contabilidad ambiental |
description |
The work aims to describe the main bibliographic characteristics of world scientific production related to sustainability and environmental accounting (hereinafter CA) in the fields of administration, business and accounting, based on a descriptive analysis of the quantitative evolution of publications , methodological approaches, study units, thematic clusters, countries, main authors and scientific journals with related publications. The methodology corresponds to a descriptive documentary study, reflective of literature, based on the publications of Scopus indexed scientific documents by Elsevier and the use of VOSviewer software. The texts were selected based on various criteria including as keywords "sustainability" and "environment accounting", limitedin the field of "Business, Management and Accounting", during the period between 2013 and 2017. The results identified 66 texts, identifying how the years with the highest number of publications correspond to 2013 with 25.8% and 2017 with 19.7% of the total documents. Likewise, the research approaches applied in the field of sustainability and CA are oriented from the qualitative paradigm with 64%, and quantitative 33%. The types of studies, with greater application are exploratory investigations with 70%,descriptive 20% and correlational with 8%. Regarding the units studied, the documents are focused from research in companies, with 68%, distributed in 77% large companies and 33% small and medium. The most relevant sectors focus on the tertiary sector with 44%, secondary 33% and primary 3%; The countries with the highest number of studies are the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. Finally, the limitations of the study focus on the methodological strategy proposed by the author, taking intoaccount a single Scopus database. There are some studies that generate contributions without being indexed in the database. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-09 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-28T21:17:43Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-28T21:17:43Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
status_str |
acceptedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Fuentes Doria, D., Toscano Hernández, A., Murillo Vanegas, V., Pérez Vásquez, M., & Jiménez Díaz, A. (2019). Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017. ECONÓMICAS CUC, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.2 |
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
0120-3932, 2382-3860 electrónico |
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/6307 |
dc.identifier.url.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.2 |
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv |
10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.2 |
dc.identifier.eissn.spa.fl_str_mv |
2382-3860 |
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
dc.identifier.pissn.spa.fl_str_mv |
0120-3932 |
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ |
identifier_str_mv |
Fuentes Doria, D., Toscano Hernández, A., Murillo Vanegas, V., Pérez Vásquez, M., & Jiménez Díaz, A. (2019). Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017. ECONÓMICAS CUC, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.2 0120-3932, 2382-3860 electrónico 10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.2 2382-3860 Corporación Universidad de la Costa 0120-3932 REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/6307 https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.2 https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv |
ECONÓMICAS CUC; Vol. 41, Núm. 1 (2020) |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
ECONÓMICAS CUC ECONÓMICAS CUC |
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, C. M. V. B., Agostinho, F., Giannetti, B. F., & Huisingh, D. (2015). Integrating cleaner production into sustainability strategies: An introduction to this special volume. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.083 Almeida, C. M. V. B., Bonilla, S. H., Giannetti, B. F., & Huisingh, D. (2013). Cleaner Production initiatives and challenges for a sustainable world: An introduction to this special volume. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.010 Alrazi, B., De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C. J. (2015). A comprehensive literature review on, and the construction of a framework for, environmental legitimacy, accountability and proactivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.022 Archibold, W., Aguilera, L. & Escobar, A. (2017). Revisoría fiscal y sostenibilidad empresarial en Colombia. ECONÓMICAS CUC, 38(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.38.2.2017.06 Arévalo, H. & Muñoz, R. (2017). Acuerdos de intercambio intersectorial entre Australia y Colombia desde el desarrollo sustentable. ECONÓMICAS CUC, 38(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.38.1.02 Arroyo, P. (2017). A new taxonomy for examining the multi-role of campus sustainability assessments in organizational change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1763– 1774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.100 Azudin, A., & Mansor, N. (2018). Management accounting practices of SMEs: The impact of organizational DNA, business potential and operational technology. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(3), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.07.014 Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013520265 Bartels, E. M. (2013). How to perform a systematic search. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology, 27(2), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2013.02.001 Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014). Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003 Bebbington, J., Russell, S., & Thomson, I. (2017). Accounting and sustainable development: Reflections and propositions. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 48, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.06.002 Briner, R., & Walshe, N. (2014). From Passively Received Wisdom To Actively Constructed Knowledge: Teaching Systematic Review Skills As a Foundation of Evidence-Based Management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(3), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0222 Brown, J., & Dillard, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1120–1156. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1313 Chan, H. K., Wang, X., & Raffoni, A. (2014). An integrated approach for green design: Life-cycle, fuzzy AHP and environmental management accounting. The British Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.004 Chumaceiro, A. & Hernández, J. (2012). La legislación tributaria venezolana como promotora de la responsabilidad social empresarial. Revista OIKOS, 16(33), 53–68. Chumaceiro, A., Chirinos Noroño, E. & Reyes, I. (2016). Antecedentes de políticas y organizaciones sociales orientadas a la promoción de la responsabilidad social empresarial en el siglo XX. Búsqueda, 3(16), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.21892/01239813.163 Contrafatto, M., & Burns, J. (2013). Social and environmental accounting, organisational change and management accounting: A processual view. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.10.004 Doorasamy, M. (2015). Theoretical developments in environmental management accounting and the role and importance of MFCA. Foundations of Management, 7(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/fman-2015-0024 Ehnert, I., Harry, W., & Zink, K. J. (2018). Sustainability and Human Resource Management - Developing Sustainable Business Organizations. NHRD Network Journal (Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0974173920130413 Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. a, & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal : Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF Fuentes, D. D., García, H. A., & Toscano, A. E. (2018). Estado actual de la implementación de las Normas Internacionales de Información Financieras ( NIIF ) en PyMEs de la ciudad de Montería , Colombia. Faces, 24(51), 1–16. Fusco, F., & Ricci, P. (2018). What is the stock of the situation? A bibliometric analysis on social and environmental accounting research in public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2017-0134 Gibassier, D., & Alcouffe, S. (2018). Environmental Management Accounting: The Missing Link to Sustainability? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2018.1437057 Gloria, G. M., & Villarreal Aguilar. (2011). CONTABILIDAD Y SOSTENIBILIDAD AMBIENTAL, “Medición de la contabilidad Ambiental en los procesos de desarrollo”. Guenther, E., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, T. W. (2016). Environmental management control systems: a conceptualization and a review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.043 Hernández, J., Chumaceiro, A. & Ravina, R. (2019). Mirada transdisciplinaria de la participación ciudadana y la felicidad social en el discurrir del milenio. Revista Utopía y Paxis, 24(Extra 3): 46-59. disponible en http://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/utopia/article/view/29685 Jenkins, J. G., Popova, V., & Sheldon, M. D. (2018). In support of public or private interests? An examination of sanctions imposed under the AICPA code of professional conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3308-2 Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University (Vol. 33). Keele (United Kingdom). Law, E. P., Diemont, S. A. W., & Toland, T. R. (2017). A sustainability comparison of green infrastructure interventions using emergy evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 145, 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.039 Lee, W. E., Birkey, R. N., & Patten, D. M. (2017). Exposing Students to Environmental Sustainability in Accounting: An Analysis of Its Impacts in a US Setting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 37(2), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2016.1270225 Linnenluecke, M. K., Russell, S. V, Griffi, A., & Linnenluecke, M. K. (2007). Subcultures and Sustainability Practices : the Impact on Understanding Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 452(December 2007), 432–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse Loi, R., Lam, L. W., Ngo, H. Y., & Cheong, S. (2015). Article information : Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 30 No, 645–658. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683940010305270 Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J.-B. (2017). Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12109 Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., … Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 Ojito, H. H., Alfonso, G., Mart, P., Londo, S., Cu, O., & Gonz, A. (2017). Contabilidad ambiental, tendencias investigativas mundiales 1, 12(1), 0–3. https://doi.org/10.22507/pml.v12n1a9 Pérez, M.E., Chumaceiro, A. & Acosta, I. (2019). Sostenibilidad social en el sector agroindustrial del estado Trujillo–Venezuela. Un constructo relevante para el desarrollo. Revista Opción, 35(90): 100-149. Disponible en https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/opcion/article/view/30460 Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006 Schaltegger, S., Gibassier, D., & Zvesdov, D. (2011). Environmental management accounting: a bibliometric literature review. Sierra, H. A., Muñoz, V. A., Solano, charris E., & Santos, J. (2020). Sustainable Development Supported by Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis. In Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future (SOHOMA 201, Vol. 853, pp. 366–376). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27477-1 Tian, X., Geng, Y., & Ulgiati, S. (2017). An emergy and decomposition assessment of China-Japan trade: Driving forces and environmental imbalance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.124 Toscano-Hernández, A., Álvarez-González, L. I., & Sanzo-Pérez, M. J. (2018). Tendencias globales de la investigación científica relacionada con la sostenibilidad en la Universidad: Un análisis bibliométrico 2008-2017. In E. Älvarez-Arregui, S. García Granda, J. R. Obeso Suárez, J. J. Coz Díaz, F. Lombo Brugos, M. Mitre Aranda, … V. Cañal Fernández (Eds.), Universidad, Investigación y Conocimiento: Comprensión e intervención en una sociedad compleja (1a ed., pp. 237–244). Oviedo (España): Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo. Toscano-Hernandez, A., Fuentes-Doria, D. D., Murillo, V., & Garcia-Alarcon, H. (2018). Contabilidad Ambiental y Sostenibilidad en las Organizaciones: Redes de colaboración y clúster temáticos de la producción científica mundial. In Innovar, Estrategia de Sostenibilidad para el Crecimiento y Desarrollo Empresarial (pp. 62– 78). Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111 /1467-8551.00375 Vilches, A., & Gil, D. (2012). La educación para la sostenibilidad en la Universidad: el reto de la formación del profesorado. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 16(2), 25–43. Westman, L., Luederitz, C., Kundurpi, A., Mercado, A. J., Weber, O., & Burch, S. L. (2019). Conceptualizing businesses as social actors: A framework for understanding sustainability actions in small- and medium-sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2256 Wichaisri, S., & Sopadang, A. (2018). Trends and Future Directions in Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1687 Yamaguchi, C. K., Silva Dos Santos, A. P., & Watanabe, M. (2015). Environmental accounting: A bibliometric study. Espacios, 36(11). Yusoff, Y. M., Omar, M. K., & Kamarudin, M. D. (2019). Does organizational learning capability allow improving business sustainability? A quantitative analysis in the manufacturing SME context. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 469(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/469/1/012015 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
1 |
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
41 |
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista Económicas CUC |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
CC0 1.0 Universal |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ |
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
CC0 1.0 Universal http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
ECONÓMICAS CUC |
institution |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
dc.source.url.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/economicascuc/article/view/2661 |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/9625f990-ee7e-48b9-870d-db5ac31ff8f9/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/b8802934-a5b1-433b-9ae5-231d07f906ec/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/2d3261f2-8d99-480e-80f9-bba7e02e2a2f/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/03c541eb-f569-4548-9f62-c127efe9e5c4/download https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/cc0148e7-1ca1-4d86-8460-327f478c8b89/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
f0bcea6a079d95c4368a19473b3b3b43 42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708c 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 c61501948c2f4fbf31b4f5ab1509462d e39e3a92221454b68e57a3a48c9ed28c |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repdigital@cuc.edu.co |
_version_ |
1811760701327278080 |
spelling |
Fuentes Doria, Deivi DavidToscano-Hernández, AnibalMurillo Vanegas, ValentinaPérez Vásquez, Manuel AntonioJiménez Díaz, Alex2020-05-28T21:17:43Z2020-05-28T21:17:43Z2019-12-09Fuentes Doria, D., Toscano Hernández, A., Murillo Vanegas, V., Pérez Vásquez, M., & Jiménez Díaz, A. (2019). Sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017. ECONÓMICAS CUC, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.20120-3932, 2382-3860 electrónicohttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/6307https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.210.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.22382-3860Corporación Universidad de la Costa0120-3932REDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/The work aims to describe the main bibliographic characteristics of world scientific production related to sustainability and environmental accounting (hereinafter CA) in the fields of administration, business and accounting, based on a descriptive analysis of the quantitative evolution of publications , methodological approaches, study units, thematic clusters, countries, main authors and scientific journals with related publications. The methodology corresponds to a descriptive documentary study, reflective of literature, based on the publications of Scopus indexed scientific documents by Elsevier and the use of VOSviewer software. The texts were selected based on various criteria including as keywords "sustainability" and "environment accounting", limitedin the field of "Business, Management and Accounting", during the period between 2013 and 2017. The results identified 66 texts, identifying how the years with the highest number of publications correspond to 2013 with 25.8% and 2017 with 19.7% of the total documents. Likewise, the research approaches applied in the field of sustainability and CA are oriented from the qualitative paradigm with 64%, and quantitative 33%. The types of studies, with greater application are exploratory investigations with 70%,descriptive 20% and correlational with 8%. Regarding the units studied, the documents are focused from research in companies, with 68%, distributed in 77% large companies and 33% small and medium. The most relevant sectors focus on the tertiary sector with 44%, secondary 33% and primary 3%; The countries with the highest number of studies are the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. Finally, the limitations of the study focus on the methodological strategy proposed by the author, taking intoaccount a single Scopus database. There are some studies that generate contributions without being indexed in the database.El trabajo tiene como objetivo describir las principales características bibliográficas de la producción científica mundial relacionada con la sostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental (en adelante CA) en los campos de administración, negocios y contabilidad, a partir de un análisis descriptivo de la evolución cuantitativa de las publicaciones, enfoques metodológicos, unidades de estudios, clústeres temáticos, países, principales autores y revistas científicas con publicaciones relacionadas. La metodología corresponde a un estudio documental descriptivo, reflexivo de literatura, sustentado en las publicaciones de documentos científicos indexados Scopus de Elsevier y la utilización del software VOSviewer. Los textos fueron seleccionados a partir de diversos criterios incluyendo como palabras claves "sustainability" y "environment accounting", limitados en el campo de “Negocios, Gestión y Contabilidad”, durante el periodo comprendido entre los años 2013 y 2017. Los resultados identificaron 66 textos, identificando como los años con mayor número de publicaciones corresponden a 2013 con el 25.8% y 2017 con el 19.7% del total de documentos. Asimismo, los enfoques investigativos aplicados en el campo de sostenibilidad y CA están orientados desde el paradigma cualitativos con un 64%, y cuantitativo 33%. Los tipos de estudios, con mayor aplicación se encuentran las investigaciones exploratorias con 70%, descriptivos 20% y correlacionales con el 8%. Respecto a las unidades estudiadas, los documentos están enfocados desde investigaciones en las empresas, con un 68%, distribuidas en 77% grandes empresas y 33% pequeñas y medianas. Los sectores con mayor relevancia se centran en el sector terciario con un 44%, secundario 33% y primario 3%; Los países con mayor número de estudios se destacan Estados Unidos, Reino Unido, Australia e Italia. Finalmente, las limitaciones del estudio se centran en la estrategia metodológica propuesta por el autor, al tener en cuenta una sola base de datos Scopus. existiendo algunos estudios que genera aportes sin estar indexada en la base de dato.Fuentes Doria, Deivi David-will be generated-orcid-0000-0002-8798-7156-600Toscano-Hernández, Anibal-will be generated-orcid-0000-0002-5064-4280-600Murillo Vanegas, Valentina-will be generated-orcid-0000-0001-6293-7294-600perez vasquez, manuel antonio-will be generated-orcid-0000-0003-3234-6260-600Jiménez Díaz, Alexapplication/pdfspaCorporación Universidad de la CostaECONÓMICAS CUC; Vol. 41, Núm. 1 (2020)ECONÓMICAS CUCECONÓMICAS CUCAlmeida, C. M. V. B., Agostinho, F., Giannetti, B. F., & Huisingh, D. (2015). Integrating cleaner production into sustainability strategies: An introduction to this special volume. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.083Almeida, C. M. V. B., Bonilla, S. H., Giannetti, B. F., & Huisingh, D. (2013). Cleaner Production initiatives and challenges for a sustainable world: An introduction to this special volume. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.010Alrazi, B., De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C. J. (2015). A comprehensive literature review on, and the construction of a framework for, environmental legitimacy, accountability and proactivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.022Archibold, W., Aguilera, L. & Escobar, A. (2017). Revisoría fiscal y sostenibilidad empresarial en Colombia. ECONÓMICAS CUC, 38(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.38.2.2017.06Arévalo, H. & Muñoz, R. (2017). Acuerdos de intercambio intersectorial entre Australia y Colombia desde el desarrollo sustentable. ECONÓMICAS CUC, 38(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.38.1.02Arroyo, P. (2017). A new taxonomy for examining the multi-role of campus sustainability assessments in organizational change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1763– 1774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.100Azudin, A., & Mansor, N. (2018). Management accounting practices of SMEs: The impact of organizational DNA, business potential and operational technology. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(3), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.07.014Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013520265Bartels, E. M. (2013). How to perform a systematic search. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology, 27(2), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2013.02.001Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014). Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003Bebbington, J., Russell, S., & Thomson, I. (2017). Accounting and sustainable development: Reflections and propositions. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 48, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.06.002Briner, R., & Walshe, N. (2014). From Passively Received Wisdom To Actively Constructed Knowledge: Teaching Systematic Review Skills As a Foundation of Evidence-Based Management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(3), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0222Brown, J., & Dillard, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1120–1156. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1313Chan, H. K., Wang, X., & Raffoni, A. (2014). An integrated approach for green design: Life-cycle, fuzzy AHP and environmental management accounting. The British Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.004Chumaceiro, A. & Hernández, J. (2012). La legislación tributaria venezolana como promotora de la responsabilidad social empresarial. Revista OIKOS, 16(33), 53–68.Chumaceiro, A., Chirinos Noroño, E. & Reyes, I. (2016). Antecedentes de políticas y organizaciones sociales orientadas a la promoción de la responsabilidad social empresarial en el siglo XX. Búsqueda, 3(16), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.21892/01239813.163Contrafatto, M., & Burns, J. (2013). Social and environmental accounting, organisational change and management accounting: A processual view. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.10.004Doorasamy, M. (2015). Theoretical developments in environmental management accounting and the role and importance of MFCA. Foundations of Management, 7(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/fman-2015-0024Ehnert, I., Harry, W., & Zink, K. J. (2018). Sustainability and Human Resource Management - Developing Sustainable Business Organizations. NHRD Network Journal (Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0974173920130413Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. a, & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal : Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSFFuentes, D. D., García, H. A., & Toscano, A. E. (2018). Estado actual de la implementación de las Normas Internacionales de Información Financieras ( NIIF ) en PyMEs de la ciudad de Montería , Colombia. Faces, 24(51), 1–16.Fusco, F., & Ricci, P. (2018). What is the stock of the situation? A bibliometric analysis on social and environmental accounting research in public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2017-0134Gibassier, D., & Alcouffe, S. (2018). Environmental Management Accounting: The Missing Link to Sustainability? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2018.1437057Gloria, G. M., & Villarreal Aguilar. (2011). CONTABILIDAD Y SOSTENIBILIDAD AMBIENTAL, “Medición de la contabilidad Ambiental en los procesos de desarrollo”.Guenther, E., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, T. W. (2016). Environmental management control systems: a conceptualization and a review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.043Hernández, J., Chumaceiro, A. & Ravina, R. (2019). Mirada transdisciplinaria de la participación ciudadana y la felicidad social en el discurrir del milenio. Revista Utopía y Paxis, 24(Extra 3): 46-59. disponible en http://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/utopia/article/view/29685Jenkins, J. G., Popova, V., & Sheldon, M. D. (2018). In support of public or private interests? An examination of sanctions imposed under the AICPA code of professional conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3308-2Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University (Vol. 33). Keele (United Kingdom).Law, E. P., Diemont, S. A. W., & Toland, T. R. (2017). A sustainability comparison of green infrastructure interventions using emergy evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 145, 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.039Lee, W. E., Birkey, R. N., & Patten, D. M. (2017). Exposing Students to Environmental Sustainability in Accounting: An Analysis of Its Impacts in a US Setting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 37(2), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2016.1270225Linnenluecke, M. K., Russell, S. V, Griffi, A., & Linnenluecke, M. K. (2007). Subcultures and Sustainability Practices : the Impact on Understanding Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 452(December 2007), 432–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/bseLoi, R., Lam, L. W., Ngo, H. Y., & Cheong, S. (2015). Article information : Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 30 No, 645–658. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683940010305270Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J.-B. (2017). Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12109Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., … Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097Ojito, H. H., Alfonso, G., Mart, P., Londo, S., Cu, O., & Gonz, A. (2017). Contabilidad ambiental, tendencias investigativas mundiales 1, 12(1), 0–3. https://doi.org/10.22507/pml.v12n1a9Pérez, M.E., Chumaceiro, A. & Acosta, I. (2019). Sostenibilidad social en el sector agroindustrial del estado Trujillo–Venezuela. Un constructo relevante para el desarrollo. Revista Opción, 35(90): 100-149. Disponible en https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/opcion/article/view/30460Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006Schaltegger, S., Gibassier, D., & Zvesdov, D. (2011). Environmental management accounting: a bibliometric literature review.Sierra, H. A., Muñoz, V. A., Solano, charris E., & Santos, J. (2020). Sustainable Development Supported by Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis. In Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future (SOHOMA 201, Vol. 853, pp. 366–376). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27477-1Tian, X., Geng, Y., & Ulgiati, S. (2017). An emergy and decomposition assessment of China-Japan trade: Driving forces and environmental imbalance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.124Toscano-Hernández, A., Álvarez-González, L. I., & Sanzo-Pérez, M. J. (2018). Tendencias globales de la investigación científica relacionada con la sostenibilidad en la Universidad: Un análisis bibliométrico 2008-2017. In E. Älvarez-Arregui, S. García Granda, J. R. Obeso Suárez, J. J. Coz Díaz, F. Lombo Brugos, M. Mitre Aranda, … V. Cañal Fernández (Eds.), Universidad, Investigación y Conocimiento: Comprensión e intervención en una sociedad compleja (1a ed., pp. 237–244). Oviedo (España): Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.Toscano-Hernandez, A., Fuentes-Doria, D. D., Murillo, V., & Garcia-Alarcon, H. (2018). Contabilidad Ambiental y Sostenibilidad en las Organizaciones: Redes de colaboración y clúster temáticos de la producción científica mundial. In Innovar, Estrategia de Sostenibilidad para el Crecimiento y Desarrollo Empresarial (pp. 62– 78).Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111 /1467-8551.00375Vilches, A., & Gil, D. (2012). La educación para la sostenibilidad en la Universidad: el reto de la formación del profesorado. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 16(2), 25–43.Westman, L., Luederitz, C., Kundurpi, A., Mercado, A. J., Weber, O., & Burch, S. L. (2019). Conceptualizing businesses as social actors: A framework for understanding sustainability actions in small- and medium-sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2256Wichaisri, S., & Sopadang, A. (2018). Trends and Future Directions in Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1687Yamaguchi, C. K., Silva Dos Santos, A. P., & Watanabe, M. (2015). Environmental accounting: A bibliometric study. Espacios, 36(11).Yusoff, Y. M., Omar, M. K., & Kamarudin, M. D. (2019). Does organizational learning capability allow improving business sustainability? A quantitative analysis in the manufacturing SME context. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 469(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/469/1/012015141Revista Económicas CUCCC0 1.0 Universalhttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2ECONÓMICAS CUChttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/economicascuc/article/view/2661Bibliometric análisisSustainabilityEnvironmental accountingAnálisis bibliométricoSostenibilidadContabilidad ambientalSostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental: Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017Sustainability and environmental accounting: Bibliometric analysis and documentary review of scientific research in the 2013-2017 periodArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionPublicationORIGINALSostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental. Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017.pdfSostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental. Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017.pdfapplication/pdf518438https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/9625f990-ee7e-48b9-870d-db5ac31ff8f9/downloadf0bcea6a079d95c4368a19473b3b3b43MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8701https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/b8802934-a5b1-433b-9ae5-231d07f906ec/download42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/2d3261f2-8d99-480e-80f9-bba7e02e2a2f/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53THUMBNAILSostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental. Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017.pdf.jpgSostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental. Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg77902https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/03c541eb-f569-4548-9f62-c127efe9e5c4/downloadc61501948c2f4fbf31b4f5ab1509462dMD54TEXTSostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental. Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017.pdf.txtSostenibilidad y contabilidad ambiental. Análisis bibliométrico y revisión documental de la investigación científica en el periodo 2013-2017.pdf.txttext/plain67741https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/cc0148e7-1ca1-4d86-8460-327f478c8b89/downloade39e3a92221454b68e57a3a48c9ed28cMD5511323/6307oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/63072024-09-17 10:18:02.919http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/CC0 1.0 Universalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.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 |