Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience

Legal issues of counteracting the imposition of unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party raise a number of theoretical and practical problems. The authors of the article try to determine the legal nature of imposition and develop methods of comprehensive counteraction to this violation in or...

Full description

Autores:
Andreevich Pisenko, Kirill
Lvovich Botvinnik, Stanislav
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositorio:
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/7037
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7037
https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
Acuerdo
Derecho antimonopolio
Equilibrio de intereses
Imposición
Derecho público
Pleito
Agreement
Antitrust law
Balance of convenience
Imposition
Public law
Tort
Rights
openAccess
License
CC0 1.0 Universal
id RCUC2_01d01a7177e14e785e2b433df3fcb005
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/7037
network_acronym_str RCUC2
network_name_str REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses
title Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience
spellingShingle Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience
Acuerdo
Derecho antimonopolio
Equilibrio de intereses
Imposición
Derecho público
Pleito
Agreement
Antitrust law
Balance of convenience
Imposition
Public law
Tort
title_short Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience
title_full Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience
title_fullStr Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience
title_full_unstemmed Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience
title_sort Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Andreevich Pisenko, Kirill
Lvovich Botvinnik, Stanislav
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Andreevich Pisenko, Kirill
Lvovich Botvinnik, Stanislav
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv Acuerdo
Derecho antimonopolio
Equilibrio de intereses
Imposición
Derecho público
Pleito
topic Acuerdo
Derecho antimonopolio
Equilibrio de intereses
Imposición
Derecho público
Pleito
Agreement
Antitrust law
Balance of convenience
Imposition
Public law
Tort
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv Agreement
Antitrust law
Balance of convenience
Imposition
Public law
Tort
description Legal issues of counteracting the imposition of unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party raise a number of theoretical and practical problems. The authors of the article try to determine the legal nature of imposition and develop methods of comprehensive counteraction to this violation in order to ensure the balance of convenience. From the philosophical perspective and a certain world- view, the study is based on the balance of convenience regarded as the objective foundation of legal regulation. The main philosophical and scientific methods used in this article include the dialectic method, the formal-legal method, the method of legal hermeneutics, as well as the comparative-legal and empirical methods. The theoretical basis is represented by scientific works in the field of civil, administrative, entrepreneurial and procedural branches of law. The legal nature of imposition as a type of violation should be determined with due regard to the general logic of antitrust regulation. The parallel use of both public and private law necessitates the development of procedural legal means ensuring uniform law enforcement and the balance of convenience. First of all, the unity of approaches regarding legal tools of public and civil law should be concerned with the definition of features and the essence of elements compiling the imposition itself. The authors also propose approaches to the formation of an appropriate procedural model.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-28T18:30:41Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-28T18:30:41Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-08
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Pisenko, K. & Botvinnik, S. (2020). Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses. Jurídicas CUC, 16(1), 251–268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7037
dc.identifier.url.spa.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv 10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10
dc.identifier.eissn.spa.fl_str_mv 2389-7716
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifier.pissn.spa.fl_str_mv 1692-3030
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv Pisenko, K. & Botvinnik, S. (2020). Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses. Jurídicas CUC, 16(1), 251–268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10
10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10
2389-7716
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
1692-3030
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
url https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7037
https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv JURÍDICAS CUC; Vol. 16, Núm. 1 (2020)
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv JURÍDICAS CUC
JURÍDICAS CUC
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Bashlakov-Nikolaev, I. V. (2013). Civil liability in the sphere of competition protection. The system of private prosecutions and classaction lawsuits. Russian Law: experience, analysis, practice, 7, 75–82. Available from http://bukvoved.ru/ anno/arhiv-2013.html
Drozdova, T. Yu. (2005). Fairness in the Russian civil law. [Thesis degree]. Baikal State University, Irkutsk. Available from http://www.dslib.net/civil-pravo/dobrosovestnost-v-rossijs- kom-grazhdanskom-prave.html
Egorova, M. A. (2018). The abuse of one’s dominant position as a common form of right abuse. Lex russica, 4(137), 70–80. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zlou- potreblenie-dominiruyuschim-polozheniem-kak-chastnyy- sluchay-zloupotrebleniya-pravom
Kuznetsova, O. A. (2006). Rules and principles of the Russian civil law. Moscow: Statut.
Kvanina, V. V. (2014). Legal remedies used to protect personal rights and interests in antitrust law. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 6(1), 60–64. Available from http://base. garant.ru/57573552/
Mikheeva, N. (2008). Fight against oppressive contracts. EJ Question-answer. Available from https://www.eg-online. ru/product/vo/year/2008/
Petrov, D. A. (2010). The imposition of contract terms as a form of abusing one’s dominant position. Yurist, 11(1), 32–38. Availbable from http://lawinfo.ru/catalog/contents-2010/ju- rist/11/
Popova, A. O. (2016). The abuse of one’s dominant position through imposing contract terms. National case law, 6(8). Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zloupotreblenie- dominiruyuschim-polozheniem-v-forme-navyazyvaniya-us- loviy-dogovora/viewer
Pyankova, A. F. (2015). The balance of convenience as a principle of civil law. Legal Concept, 1(26), 123–128. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/balans-interesov-kak- printsip-grazhdanskogo-prava
RF. FAS. (September 5, 2013). Application of the provisions of the Federal Law on the Basics of State Regulation of Trade Activities in the RF. [N AC/34872/13]. Available from https:// ppt.ru/docs/pismo/fas/n-ats-34872-13-34753
RF. FAS. (March 15, 2011). N A40-30589/10-134-224 [Resolution N KG-A40/502-11].
RF. Supreme Court. (June 23, 2015). Application of some provi- sions of the Section I of part one of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation by courts. [Resolution N 25]. Available from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ LAW_181602/
RF. State Duma. (July 27, 2006). Protection of Competition. [Federal Law No. 135-FZ]. RU077. Available from https://www. wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru077en.pdf
RF. State Duma. (November 13, 1994). The Civil Code of the Russian Federation. [Part One N 51-FZ]. RU083. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru083en.pdf
RF. Supreme Arbitration Court. (March 14, 2014). Freedom of contract and its limits. [Resolution N 16]. Newsletter of the Higher Arbitration Court, 5, 85–91. Available from http:// www.szrf.ru/szrf/doc.phtml?nb=107&issid=107201400500 0&docid=12
RF. Supreme Arbitration Court. (June 30, 2008). Issues caused by the application of antitrust law by courts. [Resolution N 30]. RU072. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lex- docs/laws/en/ru/ru072en.pdf
Ryzhenkov, A. Y. (2013). The principle of fairness in the new civil law. Gaps in Russian law. Law journal, (3), 68–71. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsip-do- brosovestnosti-v-obnovlennom-grazhdanskom-zakonoda- telstve
Volkov, A. V. (2013). The correlation between the principle of fairness and inadmissible abuse of right in modern civil law. Legal Concept, 3(20), 44–50. Available from https://cyber- leninka.ru/article/n/sootnoshenie-printsipa-dobrosovest- nosti-i-printsipa-nedopustimosti-zloupotrebleniya-pravom- v-sovremennom-grazhdanskom-prave/viewer
Yarmonova, E. N. (2019). Legal customs as the source of law. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2(2), 180–182. Available from http://intjournal.ru/wp-con- tent/uploads/2019/03/Mezhdunarodnyj-ZHurnal-2-2-1.pdf
Zelentsov, A. B. and Yastrebov, O. A. (2017). Administrative and judicial proceedings. Moscow: RUDN.
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv 268
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv 251
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 16
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Jurídicas
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 18 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv JURÍDICAS CUC
institution Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.source.url.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/2789
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/8e50a13d-0e34-4868-8222-6f284b78ed3b/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/e9781fa3-14e1-44a0-8f12-7b911b840e99/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/d02d0742-8cfe-4be4-8509-a8eb44afec70/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/4f291087-1033-439d-bef6-f6dfd569f9c9/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/fc455e20-c5b4-47d9-9a92-1693f09d3409/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 36b72f3946dfeac40444954b4ede10ee
42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708c
e30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9bad
4d327f0999db25c28f7d9f8c2d1ee9c8
6faa92454cfdade8b3fb45c26ac01431
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repdigital@cuc.edu.co
_version_ 1811760804226138112
spelling Andreevich Pisenko, KirillLvovich Botvinnik, Stanislav2020-08-28T18:30:41Z2020-08-28T18:30:41Z2020-04-08Pisenko, K. & Botvinnik, S. (2020). Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses. Jurídicas CUC, 16(1), 251–268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7037https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.1010.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.102389-7716Corporación Universidad de la Costa1692-3030REDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/Legal issues of counteracting the imposition of unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party raise a number of theoretical and practical problems. The authors of the article try to determine the legal nature of imposition and develop methods of comprehensive counteraction to this violation in order to ensure the balance of convenience. From the philosophical perspective and a certain world- view, the study is based on the balance of convenience regarded as the objective foundation of legal regulation. The main philosophical and scientific methods used in this article include the dialectic method, the formal-legal method, the method of legal hermeneutics, as well as the comparative-legal and empirical methods. The theoretical basis is represented by scientific works in the field of civil, administrative, entrepreneurial and procedural branches of law. The legal nature of imposition as a type of violation should be determined with due regard to the general logic of antitrust regulation. The parallel use of both public and private law necessitates the development of procedural legal means ensuring uniform law enforcement and the balance of convenience. First of all, the unity of approaches regarding legal tools of public and civil law should be concerned with the definition of features and the essence of elements compiling the imposition itself. The authors also propose approaches to the formation of an appropriate procedural model.Los problemas legales de contrarrestar la imposición de términos desfavorables del contrato por dominante forman un complejo de problemas teóricos y prácticos. Los autores de este artículo intentan determinar la naturaleza legal de la “imposición”, así como desarrollar enfoques para resolver los problemas de la resistencia integral a esta violación para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses. La base filosófica y concepcional es, en primer lugar, la idea de un equilibrio de intereses, como la base objetiva de la regulación legal. Entre los principales métodos filosóficos y científicos utilizados en el trabajo, en particular, son dialéctico, legal formal, hermenéutica legal, legal comparado, empírico. La base teórica es el trabajo en el derecho civil, administrativo, empresarial y procesal. La naturaleza legal de la imposición como la violación debe determinarse por la lógica general de la regulación antimonopolio. La posibilidad del uso paralelo de los recursos de derecho público y privado requiere el desarrollo de medios legales procesales para garantizar una práctica uniforme de aplicación de la ley, un equilibrio de intereses. En primer lugar, la unidad de los enfoques en el marco del derecho público y los recursos del derecho civil deben relacionarse con la determinación de los signos y el contenido de los elementos de la imposición. También se proponen los enfoques para la formación de un modelo procesal apropiado.Andreevich Pisenko, KirillLvovich Botvinnik, Stanislav18 páginasapplication/pdfengCorporación Universidad de la CostaJURÍDICAS CUC; Vol. 16, Núm. 1 (2020)JURÍDICAS CUCJURÍDICAS CUCBashlakov-Nikolaev, I. V. (2013). Civil liability in the sphere of competition protection. The system of private prosecutions and classaction lawsuits. Russian Law: experience, analysis, practice, 7, 75–82. Available from http://bukvoved.ru/ anno/arhiv-2013.htmlDrozdova, T. Yu. (2005). Fairness in the Russian civil law. [Thesis degree]. Baikal State University, Irkutsk. Available from http://www.dslib.net/civil-pravo/dobrosovestnost-v-rossijs- kom-grazhdanskom-prave.htmlEgorova, M. A. (2018). The abuse of one’s dominant position as a common form of right abuse. Lex russica, 4(137), 70–80. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zlou- potreblenie-dominiruyuschim-polozheniem-kak-chastnyy- sluchay-zloupotrebleniya-pravomKuznetsova, O. A. (2006). Rules and principles of the Russian civil law. Moscow: Statut.Kvanina, V. V. (2014). Legal remedies used to protect personal rights and interests in antitrust law. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 6(1), 60–64. Available from http://base. garant.ru/57573552/Mikheeva, N. (2008). Fight against oppressive contracts. EJ Question-answer. Available from https://www.eg-online. ru/product/vo/year/2008/Petrov, D. A. (2010). The imposition of contract terms as a form of abusing one’s dominant position. Yurist, 11(1), 32–38. Availbable from http://lawinfo.ru/catalog/contents-2010/ju- rist/11/Popova, A. O. (2016). The abuse of one’s dominant position through imposing contract terms. National case law, 6(8). Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zloupotreblenie- dominiruyuschim-polozheniem-v-forme-navyazyvaniya-us- loviy-dogovora/viewerPyankova, A. F. (2015). The balance of convenience as a principle of civil law. Legal Concept, 1(26), 123–128. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/balans-interesov-kak- printsip-grazhdanskogo-pravaRF. FAS. (September 5, 2013). Application of the provisions of the Federal Law on the Basics of State Regulation of Trade Activities in the RF. [N AC/34872/13]. Available from https:// ppt.ru/docs/pismo/fas/n-ats-34872-13-34753RF. FAS. (March 15, 2011). N A40-30589/10-134-224 [Resolution N KG-A40/502-11].RF. Supreme Court. (June 23, 2015). Application of some provi- sions of the Section I of part one of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation by courts. [Resolution N 25]. Available from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ LAW_181602/RF. State Duma. (July 27, 2006). Protection of Competition. [Federal Law No. 135-FZ]. RU077. Available from https://www. wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru077en.pdfRF. State Duma. (November 13, 1994). The Civil Code of the Russian Federation. [Part One N 51-FZ]. RU083. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru083en.pdfRF. Supreme Arbitration Court. (March 14, 2014). Freedom of contract and its limits. [Resolution N 16]. Newsletter of the Higher Arbitration Court, 5, 85–91. Available from http:// www.szrf.ru/szrf/doc.phtml?nb=107&issid=107201400500 0&docid=12RF. Supreme Arbitration Court. (June 30, 2008). Issues caused by the application of antitrust law by courts. [Resolution N 30]. RU072. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lex- docs/laws/en/ru/ru072en.pdfRyzhenkov, A. Y. (2013). The principle of fairness in the new civil law. Gaps in Russian law. Law journal, (3), 68–71. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsip-do- brosovestnosti-v-obnovlennom-grazhdanskom-zakonoda- telstveVolkov, A. V. (2013). The correlation between the principle of fairness and inadmissible abuse of right in modern civil law. Legal Concept, 3(20), 44–50. Available from https://cyber- leninka.ru/article/n/sootnoshenie-printsipa-dobrosovest- nosti-i-printsipa-nedopustimosti-zloupotrebleniya-pravom- v-sovremennom-grazhdanskom-prave/viewerYarmonova, E. N. (2019). Legal customs as the source of law. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2(2), 180–182. Available from http://intjournal.ru/wp-con- tent/uploads/2019/03/Mezhdunarodnyj-ZHurnal-2-2-1.pdfZelentsov, A. B. and Yastrebov, O. A. (2017). Administrative and judicial proceedings. Moscow: RUDN.268251116JurídicasCC0 1.0 Universalhttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2JURÍDICAS CUChttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/2789Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenienceProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de interesesArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionAcuerdoDerecho antimonopolioEquilibrio de interesesImposiciónDerecho públicoPleitoAgreementAntitrust lawBalance of convenienceImpositionPublic lawTortPublicationORIGINALProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdfProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdfapplication/pdf323628https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/8e50a13d-0e34-4868-8222-6f284b78ed3b/download36b72f3946dfeac40444954b4ede10eeMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8701https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/e9781fa3-14e1-44a0-8f12-7b911b840e99/download42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83196https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/d02d0742-8cfe-4be4-8509-a8eb44afec70/downloade30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9badMD53THUMBNAILProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdf.jpgProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg63019https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/4f291087-1033-439d-bef6-f6dfd569f9c9/download4d327f0999db25c28f7d9f8c2d1ee9c8MD54TEXTProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdf.txtProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdf.txttext/plain40810https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/fc455e20-c5b4-47d9-9a92-1693f09d3409/download6faa92454cfdade8b3fb45c26ac01431MD5511323/7037oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/70372024-09-17 12:46:41.568http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/CC0 1.0 Universalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.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