Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience
Legal issues of counteracting the imposition of unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party raise a number of theoretical and practical problems. The authors of the article try to determine the legal nature of imposition and develop methods of comprehensive counteraction to this violation in or...
- Autores:
-
Andreevich Pisenko, Kirill
Lvovich Botvinnik, Stanislav
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Corporación Universidad de la Costa
- Repositorio:
- REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/7037
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7037
https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Acuerdo
Derecho antimonopolio
Equilibrio de intereses
Imposición
Derecho público
Pleito
Agreement
Antitrust law
Balance of convenience
Imposition
Public law
Tort
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- CC0 1.0 Universal
| id |
RCUC2_01d01a7177e14e785e2b433df3fcb005 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/7037 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCUC2 |
| network_name_str |
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience |
| dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses |
| title |
Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience |
| spellingShingle |
Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience Acuerdo Derecho antimonopolio Equilibrio de intereses Imposición Derecho público Pleito Agreement Antitrust law Balance of convenience Imposition Public law Tort |
| title_short |
Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience |
| title_full |
Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience |
| title_fullStr |
Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience |
| title_sort |
Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenience |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Andreevich Pisenko, Kirill Lvovich Botvinnik, Stanislav |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Andreevich Pisenko, Kirill Lvovich Botvinnik, Stanislav |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acuerdo Derecho antimonopolio Equilibrio de intereses Imposición Derecho público Pleito |
| topic |
Acuerdo Derecho antimonopolio Equilibrio de intereses Imposición Derecho público Pleito Agreement Antitrust law Balance of convenience Imposition Public law Tort |
| dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
Agreement Antitrust law Balance of convenience Imposition Public law Tort |
| description |
Legal issues of counteracting the imposition of unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party raise a number of theoretical and practical problems. The authors of the article try to determine the legal nature of imposition and develop methods of comprehensive counteraction to this violation in order to ensure the balance of convenience. From the philosophical perspective and a certain world- view, the study is based on the balance of convenience regarded as the objective foundation of legal regulation. The main philosophical and scientific methods used in this article include the dialectic method, the formal-legal method, the method of legal hermeneutics, as well as the comparative-legal and empirical methods. The theoretical basis is represented by scientific works in the field of civil, administrative, entrepreneurial and procedural branches of law. The legal nature of imposition as a type of violation should be determined with due regard to the general logic of antitrust regulation. The parallel use of both public and private law necessitates the development of procedural legal means ensuring uniform law enforcement and the balance of convenience. First of all, the unity of approaches regarding legal tools of public and civil law should be concerned with the definition of features and the essence of elements compiling the imposition itself. The authors also propose approaches to the formation of an appropriate procedural model. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-28T18:30:41Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-28T18:30:41Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-08 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Pisenko, K. & Botvinnik, S. (2020). Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses. Jurídicas CUC, 16(1), 251–268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10 |
| dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7037 |
| dc.identifier.url.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10 |
| dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv |
10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.spa.fl_str_mv |
2389-7716 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| dc.identifier.pissn.spa.fl_str_mv |
1692-3030 |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ |
| identifier_str_mv |
Pisenko, K. & Botvinnik, S. (2020). Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses. Jurídicas CUC, 16(1), 251–268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10 10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10 2389-7716 Corporación Universidad de la Costa 1692-3030 REDICUC - Repositorio CUC |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7037 https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10 https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/ |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv |
JURÍDICAS CUC; Vol. 16, Núm. 1 (2020) |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
JURÍDICAS CUC JURÍDICAS CUC |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bashlakov-Nikolaev, I. V. (2013). Civil liability in the sphere of competition protection. The system of private prosecutions and classaction lawsuits. Russian Law: experience, analysis, practice, 7, 75–82. Available from http://bukvoved.ru/ anno/arhiv-2013.html Drozdova, T. Yu. (2005). Fairness in the Russian civil law. [Thesis degree]. Baikal State University, Irkutsk. Available from http://www.dslib.net/civil-pravo/dobrosovestnost-v-rossijs- kom-grazhdanskom-prave.html Egorova, M. A. (2018). The abuse of one’s dominant position as a common form of right abuse. Lex russica, 4(137), 70–80. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zlou- potreblenie-dominiruyuschim-polozheniem-kak-chastnyy- sluchay-zloupotrebleniya-pravom Kuznetsova, O. A. (2006). Rules and principles of the Russian civil law. Moscow: Statut. Kvanina, V. V. (2014). Legal remedies used to protect personal rights and interests in antitrust law. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 6(1), 60–64. Available from http://base. garant.ru/57573552/ Mikheeva, N. (2008). Fight against oppressive contracts. EJ Question-answer. Available from https://www.eg-online. ru/product/vo/year/2008/ Petrov, D. A. (2010). The imposition of contract terms as a form of abusing one’s dominant position. Yurist, 11(1), 32–38. Availbable from http://lawinfo.ru/catalog/contents-2010/ju- rist/11/ Popova, A. O. (2016). The abuse of one’s dominant position through imposing contract terms. National case law, 6(8). Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zloupotreblenie- dominiruyuschim-polozheniem-v-forme-navyazyvaniya-us- loviy-dogovora/viewer Pyankova, A. F. (2015). The balance of convenience as a principle of civil law. Legal Concept, 1(26), 123–128. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/balans-interesov-kak- printsip-grazhdanskogo-prava RF. FAS. (September 5, 2013). Application of the provisions of the Federal Law on the Basics of State Regulation of Trade Activities in the RF. [N AC/34872/13]. Available from https:// ppt.ru/docs/pismo/fas/n-ats-34872-13-34753 RF. FAS. (March 15, 2011). N A40-30589/10-134-224 [Resolution N KG-A40/502-11]. RF. Supreme Court. (June 23, 2015). Application of some provi- sions of the Section I of part one of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation by courts. [Resolution N 25]. Available from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ LAW_181602/ RF. State Duma. (July 27, 2006). Protection of Competition. [Federal Law No. 135-FZ]. RU077. Available from https://www. wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru077en.pdf RF. State Duma. (November 13, 1994). The Civil Code of the Russian Federation. [Part One N 51-FZ]. RU083. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru083en.pdf RF. Supreme Arbitration Court. (March 14, 2014). Freedom of contract and its limits. [Resolution N 16]. Newsletter of the Higher Arbitration Court, 5, 85–91. Available from http:// www.szrf.ru/szrf/doc.phtml?nb=107&issid=107201400500 0&docid=12 RF. Supreme Arbitration Court. (June 30, 2008). Issues caused by the application of antitrust law by courts. [Resolution N 30]. RU072. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lex- docs/laws/en/ru/ru072en.pdf Ryzhenkov, A. Y. (2013). The principle of fairness in the new civil law. Gaps in Russian law. Law journal, (3), 68–71. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsip-do- brosovestnosti-v-obnovlennom-grazhdanskom-zakonoda- telstve Volkov, A. V. (2013). The correlation between the principle of fairness and inadmissible abuse of right in modern civil law. Legal Concept, 3(20), 44–50. Available from https://cyber- leninka.ru/article/n/sootnoshenie-printsipa-dobrosovest- nosti-i-printsipa-nedopustimosti-zloupotrebleniya-pravom- v-sovremennom-grazhdanskom-prave/viewer Yarmonova, E. N. (2019). Legal customs as the source of law. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2(2), 180–182. Available from http://intjournal.ru/wp-con- tent/uploads/2019/03/Mezhdunarodnyj-ZHurnal-2-2-1.pdf Zelentsov, A. B. and Yastrebov, O. A. (2017). Administrative and judicial proceedings. Moscow: RUDN. |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv |
268 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv |
251 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
1 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
16 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv |
Jurídicas |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
CC0 1.0 Universal |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
CC0 1.0 Universal http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
18 páginas |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
JURÍDICAS CUC |
| institution |
Corporación Universidad de la Costa |
| dc.source.url.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/2789 |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/7037/1/Protecci%c3%b3n%20contra%20la%20imposici%c3%b3n%20de%20cl%c3%a1usulas%20abusivas%20por%20parte%20de%20la%20posici%c3%b3n%20dominante%20en%20la%20legislaci%c3%b3n%20rusa%20aspectos%20para%20garantizar%20un%20equilibrio%20de%20intereses.pdf https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/7037/2/license_rdf https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/7037/3/license.txt https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/7037/4/Protecci%c3%b3n%20contra%20la%20imposici%c3%b3n%20de%20cl%c3%a1usulas%20abusivas%20por%20parte%20de%20la%20posici%c3%b3n%20dominante%20en%20la%20legislaci%c3%b3n%20rusa%20aspectos%20para%20garantizar%20un%20equilibrio%20de%20intereses.pdf.jpg https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/7037/5/Protecci%c3%b3n%20contra%20la%20imposici%c3%b3n%20de%20cl%c3%a1usulas%20abusivas%20por%20parte%20de%20la%20posici%c3%b3n%20dominante%20en%20la%20legislaci%c3%b3n%20rusa%20aspectos%20para%20garantizar%20un%20equilibrio%20de%20intereses.pdf.txt |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
36b72f3946dfeac40444954b4ede10ee 42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708c e30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9bad 4d327f0999db25c28f7d9f8c2d1ee9c8 6faa92454cfdade8b3fb45c26ac01431 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad de La Costa |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1808400139209932800 |
| spelling |
Andreevich Pisenko, Kirill61317fec1c561b8b7204d8d4a59dbaa2Lvovich Botvinnik, Stanislaved11995a2fd99a9049480d6a4b279dbc2020-08-28T18:30:41Z2020-08-28T18:30:41Z2020-04-08Pisenko, K. & Botvinnik, S. (2020). Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses. Jurídicas CUC, 16(1), 251–268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7037https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.1010.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.102389-7716Corporación Universidad de la Costa1692-3030REDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/Legal issues of counteracting the imposition of unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party raise a number of theoretical and practical problems. The authors of the article try to determine the legal nature of imposition and develop methods of comprehensive counteraction to this violation in order to ensure the balance of convenience. From the philosophical perspective and a certain world- view, the study is based on the balance of convenience regarded as the objective foundation of legal regulation. The main philosophical and scientific methods used in this article include the dialectic method, the formal-legal method, the method of legal hermeneutics, as well as the comparative-legal and empirical methods. The theoretical basis is represented by scientific works in the field of civil, administrative, entrepreneurial and procedural branches of law. The legal nature of imposition as a type of violation should be determined with due regard to the general logic of antitrust regulation. The parallel use of both public and private law necessitates the development of procedural legal means ensuring uniform law enforcement and the balance of convenience. First of all, the unity of approaches regarding legal tools of public and civil law should be concerned with the definition of features and the essence of elements compiling the imposition itself. The authors also propose approaches to the formation of an appropriate procedural model.Los problemas legales de contrarrestar la imposición de términos desfavorables del contrato por dominante forman un complejo de problemas teóricos y prácticos. Los autores de este artículo intentan determinar la naturaleza legal de la “imposición”, así como desarrollar enfoques para resolver los problemas de la resistencia integral a esta violación para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses. La base filosófica y concepcional es, en primer lugar, la idea de un equilibrio de intereses, como la base objetiva de la regulación legal. Entre los principales métodos filosóficos y científicos utilizados en el trabajo, en particular, son dialéctico, legal formal, hermenéutica legal, legal comparado, empírico. La base teórica es el trabajo en el derecho civil, administrativo, empresarial y procesal. La naturaleza legal de la imposición como la violación debe determinarse por la lógica general de la regulación antimonopolio. La posibilidad del uso paralelo de los recursos de derecho público y privado requiere el desarrollo de medios legales procesales para garantizar una práctica uniforme de aplicación de la ley, un equilibrio de intereses. En primer lugar, la unidad de los enfoques en el marco del derecho público y los recursos del derecho civil deben relacionarse con la determinación de los signos y el contenido de los elementos de la imposición. También se proponen los enfoques para la formación de un modelo procesal apropiado.18 páginasapplication/pdfengCorporación Universidad de la CostaJURÍDICAS CUC; Vol. 16, Núm. 1 (2020)JURÍDICAS CUCJURÍDICAS CUCBashlakov-Nikolaev, I. V. (2013). Civil liability in the sphere of competition protection. The system of private prosecutions and classaction lawsuits. Russian Law: experience, analysis, practice, 7, 75–82. Available from http://bukvoved.ru/ anno/arhiv-2013.htmlDrozdova, T. Yu. (2005). Fairness in the Russian civil law. [Thesis degree]. Baikal State University, Irkutsk. Available from http://www.dslib.net/civil-pravo/dobrosovestnost-v-rossijs- kom-grazhdanskom-prave.htmlEgorova, M. A. (2018). The abuse of one’s dominant position as a common form of right abuse. Lex russica, 4(137), 70–80. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zlou- potreblenie-dominiruyuschim-polozheniem-kak-chastnyy- sluchay-zloupotrebleniya-pravomKuznetsova, O. A. (2006). Rules and principles of the Russian civil law. Moscow: Statut.Kvanina, V. V. (2014). Legal remedies used to protect personal rights and interests in antitrust law. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 6(1), 60–64. Available from http://base. garant.ru/57573552/Mikheeva, N. (2008). Fight against oppressive contracts. EJ Question-answer. Available from https://www.eg-online. ru/product/vo/year/2008/Petrov, D. A. (2010). The imposition of contract terms as a form of abusing one’s dominant position. Yurist, 11(1), 32–38. Availbable from http://lawinfo.ru/catalog/contents-2010/ju- rist/11/Popova, A. O. (2016). The abuse of one’s dominant position through imposing contract terms. National case law, 6(8). Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zloupotreblenie- dominiruyuschim-polozheniem-v-forme-navyazyvaniya-us- loviy-dogovora/viewerPyankova, A. F. (2015). The balance of convenience as a principle of civil law. Legal Concept, 1(26), 123–128. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/balans-interesov-kak- printsip-grazhdanskogo-pravaRF. FAS. (September 5, 2013). Application of the provisions of the Federal Law on the Basics of State Regulation of Trade Activities in the RF. [N AC/34872/13]. Available from https:// ppt.ru/docs/pismo/fas/n-ats-34872-13-34753RF. FAS. (March 15, 2011). N A40-30589/10-134-224 [Resolution N KG-A40/502-11].RF. Supreme Court. (June 23, 2015). Application of some provi- sions of the Section I of part one of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation by courts. [Resolution N 25]. Available from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ LAW_181602/RF. State Duma. (July 27, 2006). Protection of Competition. [Federal Law No. 135-FZ]. RU077. Available from https://www. wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru077en.pdfRF. State Duma. (November 13, 1994). The Civil Code of the Russian Federation. [Part One N 51-FZ]. RU083. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru083en.pdfRF. Supreme Arbitration Court. (March 14, 2014). Freedom of contract and its limits. [Resolution N 16]. Newsletter of the Higher Arbitration Court, 5, 85–91. Available from http:// www.szrf.ru/szrf/doc.phtml?nb=107&issid=107201400500 0&docid=12RF. Supreme Arbitration Court. (June 30, 2008). Issues caused by the application of antitrust law by courts. [Resolution N 30]. RU072. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lex- docs/laws/en/ru/ru072en.pdfRyzhenkov, A. Y. (2013). The principle of fairness in the new civil law. Gaps in Russian law. Law journal, (3), 68–71. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsip-do- brosovestnosti-v-obnovlennom-grazhdanskom-zakonoda- telstveVolkov, A. V. (2013). The correlation between the principle of fairness and inadmissible abuse of right in modern civil law. Legal Concept, 3(20), 44–50. Available from https://cyber- leninka.ru/article/n/sootnoshenie-printsipa-dobrosovest- nosti-i-printsipa-nedopustimosti-zloupotrebleniya-pravom- v-sovremennom-grazhdanskom-prave/viewerYarmonova, E. N. (2019). Legal customs as the source of law. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2(2), 180–182. Available from http://intjournal.ru/wp-con- tent/uploads/2019/03/Mezhdunarodnyj-ZHurnal-2-2-1.pdfZelentsov, A. B. and Yastrebov, O. A. (2017). Administrative and judicial proceedings. Moscow: RUDN.268251116JurídicasCC0 1.0 Universalhttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2JURÍDICAS CUChttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/2789Protection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of convenienceProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de interesesArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionAcuerdoDerecho antimonopolioEquilibrio de interesesImposiciónDerecho públicoPleitoAgreementAntitrust lawBalance of convenienceImpositionPublic lawTortORIGINALProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdfProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdfapplication/pdf323628https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/7037/1/Protecci%c3%b3n%20contra%20la%20imposici%c3%b3n%20de%20cl%c3%a1usulas%20abusivas%20por%20parte%20de%20la%20posici%c3%b3n%20dominante%20en%20la%20legislaci%c3%b3n%20rusa%20aspectos%20para%20garantizar%20un%20equilibrio%20de%20intereses.pdf36b72f3946dfeac40444954b4ede10eeMD51open accessCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8701https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/7037/2/license_rdf42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708cMD52open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83196https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/7037/3/license.txte30e9215131d99561d40d6b0abbe9badMD53open accessTHUMBNAILProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdf.jpgProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg63019https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/7037/4/Protecci%c3%b3n%20contra%20la%20imposici%c3%b3n%20de%20cl%c3%a1usulas%20abusivas%20por%20parte%20de%20la%20posici%c3%b3n%20dominante%20en%20la%20legislaci%c3%b3n%20rusa%20aspectos%20para%20garantizar%20un%20equilibrio%20de%20intereses.pdf.jpg4d327f0999db25c28f7d9f8c2d1ee9c8MD54open accessTEXTProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdf.txtProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses.pdf.txttext/plain40810https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstream/11323/7037/5/Protecci%c3%b3n%20contra%20la%20imposici%c3%b3n%20de%20cl%c3%a1usulas%20abusivas%20por%20parte%20de%20la%20posici%c3%b3n%20dominante%20en%20la%20legislaci%c3%b3n%20rusa%20aspectos%20para%20garantizar%20un%20equilibrio%20de%20intereses.pdf.txt6faa92454cfdade8b3fb45c26ac01431MD55open access11323/7037oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/70372023-12-14 14:59:00.078CC0 1.0 Universal|||http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/open accessRepositorio Universidad de La Costabdigital@metabiblioteca.comQXV0b3Jpem8gKGF1dG9yaXphbW9zKSBhIGxhIEJpYmxpb3RlY2EgZGUgbGEgSW5zdGl0dWNpw7NuIHBhcmEgcXVlIGluY2x1eWEgdW5hIGNvcGlhLCBpbmRleGUgeSBkaXZ1bGd1ZSBlbiBlbCBSZXBvc2l0b3JpbyBJbnN0aXR1Y2lvbmFsLCBsYSBvYnJhIG1lbmNpb25hZGEgY29uIGVsIGZpbiBkZSBmYWNpbGl0YXIgbG9zIHByb2Nlc29zIGRlIHZpc2liaWxpZGFkIGUgaW1wYWN0byBkZSBsYSBtaXNtYSwgY29uZm9ybWUgYSBsb3MgZGVyZWNob3MgcGF0cmltb25pYWxlcyBxdWUgbWUobm9zKSBjb3JyZXNwb25kZShuKSB5IHF1ZSBpbmNsdXllbjogbGEgcmVwcm9kdWNjacOzbiwgY29tdW5pY2FjacOzbiBww7pibGljYSwgZGlzdHJpYnVjacOzbiBhbCBww7pibGljbywgdHJhbnNmb3JtYWNpw7NuLCBkZSBjb25mb3JtaWRhZCBjb24gbGEgbm9ybWF0aXZpZGFkIHZpZ2VudGUgc29icmUgZGVyZWNob3MgZGUgYXV0b3IgeSBkZXJlY2hvcyBjb25leG9zIHJlZmVyaWRvcyBlbiBhcnQuIDIsIDEyLCAzMCAobW9kaWZpY2FkbyBwb3IgZWwgYXJ0IDUgZGUgbGEgbGV5IDE1MjAvMjAxMiksIHkgNzIgZGUgbGEgbGV5IDIzIGRlIGRlIDE5ODIsIExleSA0NCBkZSAxOTkzLCBhcnQuIDQgeSAxMSBEZWNpc2nDs24gQW5kaW5hIDM1MSBkZSAxOTkzIGFydC4gMTEsIERlY3JldG8gNDYwIGRlIDE5OTUsIENpcmN1bGFyIE5vIDA2LzIwMDIgZGUgbGEgRGlyZWNjacOzbiBOYWNpb25hbCBkZSBEZXJlY2hvcyBkZSBhdXRvciwgYXJ0LiAxNSBMZXkgMTUyMCBkZSAyMDEyLCBsYSBMZXkgMTkxNSBkZSAyMDE4IHkgZGVtw6FzIG5vcm1hcyBzb2JyZSBsYSBtYXRlcmlhLg0KDQpBbCByZXNwZWN0byBjb21vIEF1dG9yKGVzKSBtYW5pZmVzdGFtb3MgY29ub2NlciBxdWU6DQoNCi0gTGEgYXV0b3JpemFjacOzbiBlcyBkZSBjYXLDoWN0ZXIgbm8gZXhjbHVzaXZhIHkgbGltaXRhZGEsIGVzdG8gaW1wbGljYSBxdWUgbGEgbGljZW5jaWEgdGllbmUgdW5hIHZpZ2VuY2lhLCBxdWUgbm8gZXMgcGVycGV0dWEgeSBxdWUgZWwgYXV0b3IgcHVlZGUgcHVibGljYXIgbyBkaWZ1bmRpciBzdSBvYnJhIGVuIGN1YWxxdWllciBvdHJvIG1lZGlvLCBhc8OtIGNvbW8gbGxldmFyIGEgY2FibyBjdWFscXVpZXIgdGlwbyBkZSBhY2Npw7NuIHNvYnJlIGVsIGRvY3VtZW50by4NCg0KLSBMYSBhdXRvcml6YWNpw7NuIHRlbmRyw6EgdW5hIHZpZ2VuY2lhIGRlIGNpbmNvIGHDsW9zIGEgcGFydGlyIGRlbCBtb21lbnRvIGRlIGxhIGluY2x1c2nDs24gZGUgbGEgb2JyYSBlbiBlbCByZXBvc2l0b3JpbywgcHJvcnJvZ2FibGUgaW5kZWZpbmlkYW1lbnRlIHBvciBlbCB0aWVtcG8gZGUgZHVyYWNpw7NuIGRlIGxvcyBkZXJlY2hvcyBwYXRyaW1vbmlhbGVzIGRlbCBhdXRvciB5IHBvZHLDoSBkYXJzZSBwb3IgdGVybWluYWRhIHVuYSB2ZXogZWwgYXV0b3IgbG8gbWFuaWZpZXN0ZSBwb3IgZXNjcml0byBhIGxhIGluc3RpdHVjacOzbiwgY29uIGxhIHNhbHZlZGFkIGRlIHF1ZSBsYSBvYnJhIGVzIGRpZnVuZGlkYSBnbG9iYWxtZW50ZSB5IGNvc2VjaGFkYSBwb3IgZGlmZXJlbnRlcyBidXNjYWRvcmVzIHkvbyByZXBvc2l0b3Jpb3MgZW4gSW50ZXJuZXQgbG8gcXVlIG5vIGdhcmFudGl6YSBxdWUgbGEgb2JyYSBwdWVkYSBzZXIgcmV0aXJhZGEgZGUgbWFuZXJhIGlubWVkaWF0YSBkZSBvdHJvcyBzaXN0ZW1hcyBkZSBpbmZvcm1hY2nDs24gZW4gbG9zIHF1ZSBzZSBoYXlhIGluZGV4YWRvLCBkaWZlcmVudGVzIGFsIHJlcG9zaXRvcmlvIGluc3RpdHVjaW9uYWwgZGUgbGEgSW5zdGl0dWNpw7NuLCBkZSBtYW5lcmEgcXVlIGVsIGF1dG9yKHJlcykgdGVuZHLDoW4gcXVlIHNvbGljaXRhciBsYSByZXRpcmFkYSBkZSBzdSBvYnJhIGRpcmVjdGFtZW50ZSBhIG90cm9zIHNpc3RlbWFzIGRlIGluZm9ybWFjacOzbiBkaXN0aW50b3MgYWwgZGUgbGEgSW5zdGl0dWNpw7NuIHNpIGRlc2VhIHF1ZSBzdSBvYnJhIHNlYSByZXRpcmFkYSBkZSBpbm1lZGlhdG8uDQoNCi0gTGEgYXV0b3JpemFjacOzbiBkZSBwdWJsaWNhY2nDs24gY29tcHJlbmRlIGVsIGZvcm1hdG8gb3JpZ2luYWwgZGUgbGEgb2JyYSB5IHRvZG9zIGxvcyBkZW3DoXMgcXVlIHNlIHJlcXVpZXJhIHBhcmEgc3UgcHVibGljYWNpw7NuIGVuIGVsIHJlcG9zaXRvcmlvLiBJZ3VhbG1lbnRlLCBsYSBhdXRvcml6YWNpw7NuIHBlcm1pdGUgYSBsYSBpbnN0aXR1Y2nDs24gZWwgY2FtYmlvIGRlIHNvcG9ydGUgZGUgbGEgb2JyYSBjb24gZmluZXMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmFjacOzbiAoaW1wcmVzbywgZWxlY3Ryw7NuaWNvLCBkaWdpdGFsLCBJbnRlcm5ldCwgaW50cmFuZXQsIG8gY3VhbHF1aWVyIG90cm8gZm9ybWF0byBjb25vY2lkbyBvIHBvciBjb25vY2VyKS4NCg0KLSBMYSBhdXRvcml6YWNpw7NuIGVzIGdyYXR1aXRhIHkgc2UgcmVudW5jaWEgYSByZWNpYmlyIGN1YWxxdWllciByZW11bmVyYWNpw7NuIHBvciBsb3MgdXNvcyBkZSBsYSBvYnJhLCBkZSBhY3VlcmRvIGNvbiBsYSBsaWNlbmNpYSBlc3RhYmxlY2lkYSBlbiBlc3RhIGF1dG9yaXphY2nDs24uDQoNCi0gQWwgZmlybWFyIGVzdGEgYXV0b3JpemFjacOzbiwgc2UgbWFuaWZpZXN0YSBxdWUgbGEgb2JyYSBlcyBvcmlnaW5hbCB5IG5vIGV4aXN0ZSBlbiBlbGxhIG5pbmd1bmEgdmlvbGFjacOzbiBhIGxvcyBkZXJlY2hvcyBkZSBhdXRvciBkZSB0ZXJjZXJvcy4gRW4gY2FzbyBkZSBxdWUgZWwgdHJhYmFqbyBoYXlhIHNpZG8gZmluYW5jaWFkbyBwb3IgdGVyY2Vyb3MgZWwgbyBsb3MgYXV0b3JlcyBhc3VtZW4gbGEgcmVzcG9uc2FiaWxpZGFkIGRlbCBjdW1wbGltaWVudG8gZGUgbG9zIGFjdWVyZG9zIGVzdGFibGVjaWRvcyBzb2JyZSBsb3MgZGVyZWNob3MgcGF0cmltb25pYWxlcyBkZSBsYSBvYnJhIGNvbiBkaWNobyB0ZXJjZXJvLg0KDQotIEZyZW50ZSBhIGN1YWxxdWllciByZWNsYW1hY2nDs24gcG9yIHRlcmNlcm9zLCBlbCBvIGxvcyBhdXRvcmVzIHNlcsOhbiByZXNwb25zYWJsZXMsIGVuIG5pbmfDum4gY2FzbyBsYSByZXNwb25zYWJpbGlkYWQgc2Vyw6EgYXN1bWlkYSBwb3IgbGEgaW5zdGl0dWNpw7NuLg0KDQotIENvbiBsYSBhdXRvcml6YWNpw7NuLCBsYSBpbnN0aXR1Y2nDs24gcHVlZGUgZGlmdW5kaXIgbGEgb2JyYSBlbiDDrW5kaWNlcywgYnVzY2Fkb3JlcyB5IG90cm9zIHNpc3RlbWFzIGRlIGluZm9ybWFjacOzbiBxdWUgZmF2b3JlemNhbiBzdSB2aXNpYmlsaWRhZA== |