La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale

During the years the Roman Rota Law has elaborated two concepts inrelation to unity as a feature of marriage. Traditional Rota Law confirmsthe equalization between the unity of the marriage bond and the bonum fidei, whlist for more recent Rota Law it is not possible to deal with these two components...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
article
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
Idioma:
ita
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/29034
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/17313
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/29034
Palabra clave:
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos de autor 2016 Universitas Canónica
id JAVERIANA_e11349ca15a6b32a1888eb280220f312
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/29034
network_acronym_str JAVERIANA
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
repository_id_str
spelling La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotaleLa natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotaleSzpak, Avv. ElizaDuring the years the Roman Rota Law has elaborated two concepts inrelation to unity as a feature of marriage. Traditional Rota Law confirmsthe equalization between the unity of the marriage bond and the bonum fidei, whlist for more recent Rota Law it is not possible to deal with these two components as if they were one, but considers them as two different realities. A milestone in this sense was the Rota sentence coram De Jorio of 30 October 1963, which was the first sentence with which the reason for invalidity was the exclusion of the bonum fidei seu fidelitas. The surrender of the traditional concept i.e. the equalization between unity of marriage and the bonum fidei confirms not only the distinction between poligamy and the transfer of the ius in corpus to a third person, but it also specifies that whereas at the moment of the consent the exclusive right to the ius in corpus is denied, the obligation to marriage loyalty is also denied. Therefore, the framework involving the bonum fidei seu unitas has been abandoned and substituted with the term bonum fidei seu fidelitas.Nel corso degli anni la giurisprudenza rotale ha elaborato due diversiconcetti che appartengo all’unità come proprietà matrimoniale. E così lagiurisprudenza rotale tradizionale conferma l’equiparazione tra l’unità delvincolo matrimoniale e il bonum fidei, mentre la giurisprudenza rotalerecente ritiene che non si può trattare di questi due componenti comeuno, bensì sono le due realtà diverse. Il momento decisivo nella distinzionefu la sentenza rotale coram De Jorio del 30 ottobre 1963, come la primasentenza con la quale il capo di nullità fu proprio l’esclusione del bonumfidei seu fidelitas. La rinuncia del concetto tradizionale cioè l’equiparazionetra l’unità del matrimonio e il bonum fidei ha confermato non soltantol’intenzione poligamica o il fatto di trasferire del diritto ad una personaterza, ma ha specificato la precisa descrizione, cioè se nell’atto del consensoviene negato il diritto esclusivo ai rapporti intimi ma anche se viene rigettatol’obbligo della fedeltà matrimoniale. Di conseguenza è stato abbandonatolo schema che tratta bonum fidei seu unitas per cambiarlo con il terminebonum fidei seu fidelitas.Universitas Canónica2020-04-15T13:39:12Z2020-04-15T13:39:12Z2016-08-23http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo revisado por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPDFapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/173130120-4491http://hdl.handle.net/10554/29034itahttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/17313/13849Universitas Canónica; Vol. 32 Núm. 48 (2015)Derechos de autor 2016 Universitas CanónicaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javerianainstname:Pontificia Universidad Javerianainstacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana2023-03-29T19:02:39Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale
La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale
title La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale
spellingShingle La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale
Szpak, Avv. Eliza
title_short La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale
title_full La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale
title_fullStr La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale
title_full_unstemmed La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale
title_sort La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Szpak, Avv. Eliza
author Szpak, Avv. Eliza
author_facet Szpak, Avv. Eliza
author_role author
description During the years the Roman Rota Law has elaborated two concepts inrelation to unity as a feature of marriage. Traditional Rota Law confirmsthe equalization between the unity of the marriage bond and the bonum fidei, whlist for more recent Rota Law it is not possible to deal with these two components as if they were one, but considers them as two different realities. A milestone in this sense was the Rota sentence coram De Jorio of 30 October 1963, which was the first sentence with which the reason for invalidity was the exclusion of the bonum fidei seu fidelitas. The surrender of the traditional concept i.e. the equalization between unity of marriage and the bonum fidei confirms not only the distinction between poligamy and the transfer of the ius in corpus to a third person, but it also specifies that whereas at the moment of the consent the exclusive right to the ius in corpus is denied, the obligation to marriage loyalty is also denied. Therefore, the framework involving the bonum fidei seu unitas has been abandoned and substituted with the term bonum fidei seu fidelitas.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-23
2020-04-15T13:39:12Z
2020-04-15T13:39:12Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
Artículo de revista
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Artículo revisado por pares
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/17313
0120-4491
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/29034
url http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/17313
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/29034
identifier_str_mv 0120-4491
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv ita
language ita
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/17313/13849
Universitas Canónica; Vol. 32 Núm. 48 (2015)
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Universitas Canónica
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Universitas Canónica
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv PDF
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universitas Canónica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universitas Canónica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
instname:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instacron_str Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
reponame_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
collection Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
_version_ 1803712878810759168