La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale
During the years the Roman Rota Law has elaborated two concepts inrelation to unity as a feature of marriage. Traditional Rota Law confirmsthe equalization between the unity of the marriage bond and the bonum fidei, whlist for more recent Rota Law it is not possible to deal with these two components...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- article
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
- Idioma:
- ita
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/29034
- Acceso en línea:
- http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/17313
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/29034
- Palabra clave:
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos de autor 2016 Universitas Canónica
id |
JAVERIANA_e11349ca15a6b32a1888eb280220f312 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/29034 |
network_acronym_str |
JAVERIANA |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotaleLa natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotaleSzpak, Avv. ElizaDuring the years the Roman Rota Law has elaborated two concepts inrelation to unity as a feature of marriage. Traditional Rota Law confirmsthe equalization between the unity of the marriage bond and the bonum fidei, whlist for more recent Rota Law it is not possible to deal with these two components as if they were one, but considers them as two different realities. A milestone in this sense was the Rota sentence coram De Jorio of 30 October 1963, which was the first sentence with which the reason for invalidity was the exclusion of the bonum fidei seu fidelitas. The surrender of the traditional concept i.e. the equalization between unity of marriage and the bonum fidei confirms not only the distinction between poligamy and the transfer of the ius in corpus to a third person, but it also specifies that whereas at the moment of the consent the exclusive right to the ius in corpus is denied, the obligation to marriage loyalty is also denied. Therefore, the framework involving the bonum fidei seu unitas has been abandoned and substituted with the term bonum fidei seu fidelitas.Nel corso degli anni la giurisprudenza rotale ha elaborato due diversiconcetti che appartengo all’unità come proprietà matrimoniale. E così lagiurisprudenza rotale tradizionale conferma l’equiparazione tra l’unità delvincolo matrimoniale e il bonum fidei, mentre la giurisprudenza rotalerecente ritiene che non si può trattare di questi due componenti comeuno, bensì sono le due realtà diverse. Il momento decisivo nella distinzionefu la sentenza rotale coram De Jorio del 30 ottobre 1963, come la primasentenza con la quale il capo di nullità fu proprio l’esclusione del bonumfidei seu fidelitas. La rinuncia del concetto tradizionale cioè l’equiparazionetra l’unità del matrimonio e il bonum fidei ha confermato non soltantol’intenzione poligamica o il fatto di trasferire del diritto ad una personaterza, ma ha specificato la precisa descrizione, cioè se nell’atto del consensoviene negato il diritto esclusivo ai rapporti intimi ma anche se viene rigettatol’obbligo della fedeltà matrimoniale. Di conseguenza è stato abbandonatolo schema che tratta bonum fidei seu unitas per cambiarlo con il terminebonum fidei seu fidelitas.Universitas Canónica2020-04-15T13:39:12Z2020-04-15T13:39:12Z2016-08-23http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo revisado por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPDFapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/173130120-4491http://hdl.handle.net/10554/29034itahttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/17313/13849Universitas Canónica; Vol. 32 Núm. 48 (2015)Derechos de autor 2016 Universitas CanónicaAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javerianainstname:Pontificia Universidad Javerianainstacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana2023-03-29T19:02:39Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale |
title |
La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale |
spellingShingle |
La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale Szpak, Avv. Eliza |
title_short |
La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale |
title_full |
La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale |
title_fullStr |
La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale |
title_full_unstemmed |
La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale |
title_sort |
La natura del bonum fidei nella giurisprudenza rotale |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Szpak, Avv. Eliza |
author |
Szpak, Avv. Eliza |
author_facet |
Szpak, Avv. Eliza |
author_role |
author |
description |
During the years the Roman Rota Law has elaborated two concepts inrelation to unity as a feature of marriage. Traditional Rota Law confirmsthe equalization between the unity of the marriage bond and the bonum fidei, whlist for more recent Rota Law it is not possible to deal with these two components as if they were one, but considers them as two different realities. A milestone in this sense was the Rota sentence coram De Jorio of 30 October 1963, which was the first sentence with which the reason for invalidity was the exclusion of the bonum fidei seu fidelitas. The surrender of the traditional concept i.e. the equalization between unity of marriage and the bonum fidei confirms not only the distinction between poligamy and the transfer of the ius in corpus to a third person, but it also specifies that whereas at the moment of the consent the exclusive right to the ius in corpus is denied, the obligation to marriage loyalty is also denied. Therefore, the framework involving the bonum fidei seu unitas has been abandoned and substituted with the term bonum fidei seu fidelitas. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-23 2020-04-15T13:39:12Z 2020-04-15T13:39:12Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Artículo revisado por pares info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/17313 0120-4491 http://hdl.handle.net/10554/29034 |
url |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/17313 http://hdl.handle.net/10554/29034 |
identifier_str_mv |
0120-4491 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
ita |
language |
ita |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnicanonica/article/view/17313/13849 Universitas Canónica; Vol. 32 Núm. 48 (2015) |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Universitas Canónica Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Universitas Canónica Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
PDF application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universitas Canónica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universitas Canónica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javeriana instname:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana instacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
instacron_str |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
institution |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
reponame_str |
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana |
collection |
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana |
_version_ |
1803712878810759168 |