Public Perception of the Motives that Lead Political Leaders to Launch Interstate Armed Conflicts: A Structural and Cross-Cultural Study

The way the people from two culturally very different countries perceive the psychological motives that lead political leaders to launch armed actions against other states was examined. Three types of possible psychological motives, taken from McClelland’s (1985) theory of human motivation, were con...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
article
Fecha de publicación:
2013
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/32716
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2577
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32716
Palabra clave:
Conflictos internacionales, motivaciones humanas, agresión, personalidad, valores, conservatismo
International Conflicts, Human Motivation, Aggression, Personality, Values, Conservatism.
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
id JAVERIANA_8478cf49222404f24675fdc812103a08
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/32716
network_acronym_str JAVERIANA
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Public Perception of the Motives that Lead Political Leaders to Launch Interstate Armed Conflicts: A Structural and Cross-Cultural Study
Percepción pública de los motivos que conducen a los líderes políticos para desarrollar los conflictos armados interestatales: Un estudio estructural y transcultural
title Public Perception of the Motives that Lead Political Leaders to Launch Interstate Armed Conflicts: A Structural and Cross-Cultural Study
spellingShingle Public Perception of the Motives that Lead Political Leaders to Launch Interstate Armed Conflicts: A Structural and Cross-Cultural Study
Mullet, Etienne; EPHE
Conflictos internacionales, motivaciones humanas, agresión, personalidad, valores, conservatismo
International Conflicts, Human Motivation, Aggression, Personality, Values, Conservatism.
title_short Public Perception of the Motives that Lead Political Leaders to Launch Interstate Armed Conflicts: A Structural and Cross-Cultural Study
title_full Public Perception of the Motives that Lead Political Leaders to Launch Interstate Armed Conflicts: A Structural and Cross-Cultural Study
title_fullStr Public Perception of the Motives that Lead Political Leaders to Launch Interstate Armed Conflicts: A Structural and Cross-Cultural Study
title_full_unstemmed Public Perception of the Motives that Lead Political Leaders to Launch Interstate Armed Conflicts: A Structural and Cross-Cultural Study
title_sort Public Perception of the Motives that Lead Political Leaders to Launch Interstate Armed Conflicts: A Structural and Cross-Cultural Study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mullet, Etienne; EPHE
Djeriouat, Hakim; University of Toulouse
author Mullet, Etienne; EPHE
author_facet Mullet, Etienne; EPHE
Djeriouat, Hakim; University of Toulouse
author_role author
author2 Djeriouat, Hakim; University of Toulouse
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv null
null
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Conflictos internacionales, motivaciones humanas, agresión, personalidad, valores, conservatismo
International Conflicts, Human Motivation, Aggression, Personality, Values, Conservatism.
topic Conflictos internacionales, motivaciones humanas, agresión, personalidad, valores, conservatismo
International Conflicts, Human Motivation, Aggression, Personality, Values, Conservatism.
description The way the people from two culturally very different countries perceive the psychological motives that lead political leaders to launch armed actions against other states was examined. Three types of possible psychological motives, taken from McClelland’s (1985) theory of human motivation, were considered: motives associated with the state’s power (e.g., increasing the country’s economic power), motives associated with other states’ political character (e.g., whether neighboring states are relatively peaceful democracies or threatening autocracies), and motives associated with domestic issues (e.g., appearing as a strong leader able to efficiently fight for the security of the country). A total of 442 participants living in Western Europe (France) and 180 participants living in the Maghreb (Algeria) were presented with a Motives of War questionnaire that was created for the present set of studies. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses showed that the hypothesized model of motives holds with the condition that the increasing power motive is divided into two separate motives: one associated with the economy and one associated with the territory. The motives of war tended to be seen as more personal and as more associated with domestic issues among people living in Algeria than among people living in France. Among traditional/authoritarian people living in France, the motives of war tended to be seen in a more positive light than among liberal people. In contrast, among traditional/authoritarian people living in Algeria, the motives of war tend to be seen in a more negative light than among liberal people.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-18
2018-02-24T16:03:35Z
2018-02-24T16:03:35Z
2020-04-15T18:25:59Z
2020-04-15T18:25:59Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
Artículo de revista
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2577
2011-2777
1657-9267
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32716
url http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2577
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32716
identifier_str_mv 2011-2777
1657-9267
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2577/4830
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2577/4831
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/downloadSuppFile/2577/640
Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 12, Núm. 2 (2013); 327-346
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv PDF
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
instname:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instacron_str Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
reponame_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
collection Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
_version_ 1803712894977703936
spelling Public Perception of the Motives that Lead Political Leaders to Launch Interstate Armed Conflicts: A Structural and Cross-Cultural StudyPercepción pública de los motivos que conducen a los líderes políticos para desarrollar los conflictos armados interestatales: Un estudio estructural y transculturalMullet, Etienne; EPHEDjeriouat, Hakim; University of ToulouseConflictos internacionales, motivaciones humanas, agresión, personalidad, valores, conservatismoInternational Conflicts, Human Motivation, Aggression, Personality, Values, Conservatism.The way the people from two culturally very different countries perceive the psychological motives that lead political leaders to launch armed actions against other states was examined. Three types of possible psychological motives, taken from McClelland’s (1985) theory of human motivation, were considered: motives associated with the state’s power (e.g., increasing the country’s economic power), motives associated with other states’ political character (e.g., whether neighboring states are relatively peaceful democracies or threatening autocracies), and motives associated with domestic issues (e.g., appearing as a strong leader able to efficiently fight for the security of the country). A total of 442 participants living in Western Europe (France) and 180 participants living in the Maghreb (Algeria) were presented with a Motives of War questionnaire that was created for the present set of studies. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses showed that the hypothesized model of motives holds with the condition that the increasing power motive is divided into two separate motives: one associated with the economy and one associated with the territory. The motives of war tended to be seen as more personal and as more associated with domestic issues among people living in Algeria than among people living in France. Among traditional/authoritarian people living in France, the motives of war tended to be seen in a more positive light than among liberal people. In contrast, among traditional/authoritarian people living in Algeria, the motives of war tend to be seen in a more negative light than among liberal people.Se examina la forma en que las personas de dos países culturalmente muy diferentes perciben los motivos psicológicos que conducen a los líderes políticos a poner en marcha acciones armadas contra otro estados. Tres tipos de motivos psicológicos posibles, tomados de la teoría de McClelland (1985) sobre la motivación humana fueron consideradas: motivos asociados con el estado de poder (e.g., incrementar el poder económico del país), motivos asociados con políticas de otros estados (e.g., si los estados vecinos son relativamente democracias pacíficas o autocracias amenazantes), y motivos asociados con temas domésticos (e.g., aparicencia como un fuerte lidear capar para luchar eficientemente para mantener la seguridad del país). A un total de 442 habitantes de Europa Occidental (Francia) y 180 habitantes en Maghreb (Algeria) se les administró el cuestionario de Motivos de Guerra que fue diseñado para este estudio. Se presenta un análisis exploratorio y confirmatorio que hipotetiza el modelo de motivos mantenidos con la condición que el incremento en el motivo de poder se dividió en dos motivos separados: uno asociado con la economía y otro asociado con el territorio. Los motivos de guerra tienden a ser vistos como más personales y asociados con temas internos entre los habitantes en Algeria que los habitantes en Francia. Entre los tradicional y autoritarios habitantes en Francia, los motivos de guerra tienden a ser percibidos de forma más positiva que entre las personas liberales. En contraste, entre las personas autoritarias o tradiciones que habitan Algeria, los motivos de guerra tienen a ser vistos de forma más negativa que entre las personas liberales.Pontificia Universidad Javeriananullnull2018-02-24T16:03:35Z2020-04-15T18:25:59Z2018-02-24T16:03:35Z2020-04-15T18:25:59Z2013-01-18http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPDFapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/25772011-27771657-9267http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32716spahttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2577/4830http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2577/4831http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/downloadSuppFile/2577/640Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 12, Núm. 2 (2013); 327-346Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javerianainstname:Pontificia Universidad Javerianainstacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana2023-03-29T19:28:49Z