Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach

The curvature of the value/utility function has been understood, since D. Bernouilli, as the expression of an attitude towards risk. This perspectivewas kept in such influential theories of judgment and decision as Prospect Theory, in both its original and cumulative versions (Kahneman & Tve...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
article
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/33090
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33090
Palabra clave:
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos de autor 2016 Ricardo G. Viegas, Armando M. Oliveira
id JAVERIANA_6b1a76edca903313873b829cb82d686a
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/33090
network_acronym_str JAVERIANA
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach
Comparación de adultos y adolescentes con respecto al alcance de insensibilidad de las curvas de valor: Un método de medición de funcionamiento
title Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach
spellingShingle Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach
Viegas, Ricardo G.
title_short Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach
title_full Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach
title_fullStr Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach
title_full_unstemmed Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach
title_sort Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Viegas, Ricardo G.
Oliveira, Armando M.
Gaspar Viegas, Ricardo
author Viegas, Ricardo G.
author_facet Viegas, Ricardo G.
Oliveira, Armando M.
Gaspar Viegas, Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Armando M.
Gaspar Viegas, Ricardo
author2_role author
author
description The curvature of the value/utility function has been understood, since D. Bernouilli, as the expression of an attitude towards risk. This perspectivewas kept in such influential theories of judgment and decision as Prospect Theory, in both its original and cumulative versions (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1992). More recently, dualprocess interpretations of the value function as a mix of affect and deliberation (Hsee & Rottenstreich, 2004) have proposed that function curvature reflects the operation of affect-based evaluations via an affective focus coefficient indexed by “α” (varying between 0 and 1) in the equation v = A αS 1-α (with “v” the subjective value, “A” the intensity of the affective response, and “S” the scope of the stimuli). According to this view, evaluating more hedonic targets results in more curved (scopeinsensitive) functions than evaluating instrumental/utilitarian targets, and more affect-oriented subjects exhibit more pronounced curvatures (lower 1α) than deliberation-oriented subjects. These predictions are evaluated in this study and additionally used for an exploratory evaluation of Reyna and Farley’s (2006, 2007) proposal that analytical processing and gist/affect-based processing predominate, respectively, in adolescents’ and in adults’ judgment and decision making. Information Integration Theory was used to establish a model allowing for the functional measurement of subjective value at the (ratio) level required for comparing curvature parameters and computing Loss Aversion coefficients. The outcomes partially favored the prediction of larger curvatures (lower 1- α) and larger loss aversion in more hedonic tasks. However, they did not support the prediction of more scope insensitivity and larger values of loss aversion in adults than in adolescents. As the main suggested difference between adults and adolescents, individual differences in risk attitude appeared to be less polarized towards loss aversion among adolescents in more hedonic tasks.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-07
2020-04-15T18:28:06Z
2020-04-15T18:28:06Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
Artículo de revista
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Artículo revisado por pares
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768
10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.caar
2011-2777
1657-9267
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33090
url http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33090
identifier_str_mv 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.caar
2011-2777
1657-9267
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768/14406
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768/14688
Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2016); 1-14
Universitas Psychologica; Vol 15 No 3 (2016); 1-14
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Ricardo G. Viegas, Armando M. Oliveira
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Ricardo G. Viegas, Armando M. Oliveira
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv PDF
application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
instname:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instacron_str Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
reponame_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
collection Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
_version_ 1803712809931898880
spelling Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approachComparación de adultos y adolescentes con respecto al alcance de insensibilidad de las curvas de valor: Un método de medición de funcionamientoViegas, Ricardo G.Oliveira, Armando M.Gaspar Viegas, RicardoThe curvature of the value/utility function has been understood, since D. Bernouilli, as the expression of an attitude towards risk. This perspectivewas kept in such influential theories of judgment and decision as Prospect Theory, in both its original and cumulative versions (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1992). More recently, dualprocess interpretations of the value function as a mix of affect and deliberation (Hsee & Rottenstreich, 2004) have proposed that function curvature reflects the operation of affect-based evaluations via an affective focus coefficient indexed by “α” (varying between 0 and 1) in the equation v = A αS 1-α (with “v” the subjective value, “A” the intensity of the affective response, and “S” the scope of the stimuli). According to this view, evaluating more hedonic targets results in more curved (scopeinsensitive) functions than evaluating instrumental/utilitarian targets, and more affect-oriented subjects exhibit more pronounced curvatures (lower 1α) than deliberation-oriented subjects. These predictions are evaluated in this study and additionally used for an exploratory evaluation of Reyna and Farley’s (2006, 2007) proposal that analytical processing and gist/affect-based processing predominate, respectively, in adolescents’ and in adults’ judgment and decision making. Information Integration Theory was used to establish a model allowing for the functional measurement of subjective value at the (ratio) level required for comparing curvature parameters and computing Loss Aversion coefficients. The outcomes partially favored the prediction of larger curvatures (lower 1- α) and larger loss aversion in more hedonic tasks. However, they did not support the prediction of more scope insensitivity and larger values of loss aversion in adults than in adolescents. As the main suggested difference between adults and adolescents, individual differences in risk attitude appeared to be less polarized towards loss aversion among adolescents in more hedonic tasks.La curva de la función valor/utilidad ha sido comprendida, desde D. Bernouilli, como la expresión de una actitud frente a un riesgo. Este punto de vista se mantuvo vigente en teorías influyentes del juicio y la toma de decisiones en la denominada Teoría de la Perspectiva, tanto en sus versiones originales como las subsecuentes (Kahneman y Tversky, 1979; Tversky y Kahneman, 1992). Más recientemente, las interpretaciones sobre el proceso dual de la función de valor que se muestran como una mezcla entre el afecto y la deliberación (Hsee y Rottenstreich, 2004) han propuesto que la función de la curva representa las evaluaciones basadas en el afecto a través de un coeficiente de enfoque afectivo incluido como "α" (que varía entre 0 y 1) en la ecuación v = A αS 1-α (donde "v" es valor subjetivo, "A" es la intensidad de la respuesta afectiva, y "S" es el alcance real de los estímulos). De acuerdo con este punto de vista, la evaluación de los resultados de los más hedonistas muestra una función más encurvada ( insensibilidad al alcance) que la evaluación de los instrumentales / utilitarios, y los más orientados por el afecto muestran una curvatura más pronunciada (inferior 1-α) que los sujetos orientados a la deliberación. Estas predicciones son evaluadas en este estudio y además utilizadas para una evaluación exploratoria de la propuesta de Reyna y Farley (2006, 2007) en la que predomina el procesamiento analítico y el procesamiento síntesis/basado en el afecto, respectivamente, en los juicios y toma de decisiones de los adolescentes y de los adultos. La Teoría de Integración de la Información se utilizó para establecer un modelo apropiado para la medición funcional del valor subjetivo (índice) del nivel requerido para comparar los parámetros de curvatura y calcular los coeficientes de Aversión a la Pérdida. Los resultados favorecieron parcialmente la predicción de curvaturas más grandes (menores que 1- α) y mayor aversión a las pérdidas en las tareas más hedonistas. Sin embargo, no apoyaban la predicción de mayor alcance de insensibilidad y grandes valores de aversión a las pérdidas en los adultos que en los adolescentes. Los resultados más importantes sugieren una diferencia entre adultos y adolescentes, las diferencias individuales de la actitud ante el riesgo parecieron ser menos polarizadas frente a la aversión a las pérdidas entre los adolescentes en tareas más hedonistas.Pontificia Universidad Javeriana2020-04-15T18:28:06Z2020-04-15T18:28:06Z2016-10-07http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo revisado por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPDFapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/1676810.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.caar2011-27771657-9267http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33090enghttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768/14406http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768/14688Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2016); 1-14Universitas Psychologica; Vol 15 No 3 (2016); 1-14Derechos de autor 2016 Ricardo G. Viegas, Armando M. OliveiraAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javerianainstname:Pontificia Universidad Javerianainstacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana2023-03-29T19:24:57Z