Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach
The curvature of the value/utility function has been understood, since D. Bernouilli, as the expression of an attitude towards risk. This perspectivewas kept in such influential theories of judgment and decision as Prospect Theory, in both its original and cumulative versions (Kahneman & Tve...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- article
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/33090
- Acceso en línea:
- http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33090
- Palabra clave:
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos de autor 2016 Ricardo G. Viegas, Armando M. Oliveira
id |
JAVERIANA_6b1a76edca903313873b829cb82d686a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/33090 |
network_acronym_str |
JAVERIANA |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach Comparación de adultos y adolescentes con respecto al alcance de insensibilidad de las curvas de valor: Un método de medición de funcionamiento |
title |
Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach |
spellingShingle |
Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach Viegas, Ricardo G. |
title_short |
Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach |
title_full |
Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach |
title_fullStr |
Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach |
title_sort |
Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approach |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Viegas, Ricardo G. Oliveira, Armando M. Gaspar Viegas, Ricardo |
author |
Viegas, Ricardo G. |
author_facet |
Viegas, Ricardo G. Oliveira, Armando M. Gaspar Viegas, Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Armando M. Gaspar Viegas, Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author |
description |
The curvature of the value/utility function has been understood, since D. Bernouilli, as the expression of an attitude towards risk. This perspectivewas kept in such influential theories of judgment and decision as Prospect Theory, in both its original and cumulative versions (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1992). More recently, dualprocess interpretations of the value function as a mix of affect and deliberation (Hsee & Rottenstreich, 2004) have proposed that function curvature reflects the operation of affect-based evaluations via an affective focus coefficient indexed by “α” (varying between 0 and 1) in the equation v = A αS 1-α (with “v” the subjective value, “A” the intensity of the affective response, and “S” the scope of the stimuli). According to this view, evaluating more hedonic targets results in more curved (scopeinsensitive) functions than evaluating instrumental/utilitarian targets, and more affect-oriented subjects exhibit more pronounced curvatures (lower 1α) than deliberation-oriented subjects. These predictions are evaluated in this study and additionally used for an exploratory evaluation of Reyna and Farley’s (2006, 2007) proposal that analytical processing and gist/affect-based processing predominate, respectively, in adolescents’ and in adults’ judgment and decision making. Information Integration Theory was used to establish a model allowing for the functional measurement of subjective value at the (ratio) level required for comparing curvature parameters and computing Loss Aversion coefficients. The outcomes partially favored the prediction of larger curvatures (lower 1- α) and larger loss aversion in more hedonic tasks. However, they did not support the prediction of more scope insensitivity and larger values of loss aversion in adults than in adolescents. As the main suggested difference between adults and adolescents, individual differences in risk attitude appeared to be less polarized towards loss aversion among adolescents in more hedonic tasks. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-07 2020-04-15T18:28:06Z 2020-04-15T18:28:06Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Artículo revisado por pares info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.caar 2011-2777 1657-9267 http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33090 |
url |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768 http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33090 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.caar 2011-2777 1657-9267 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768/14406 http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768/14688 Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2016); 1-14 Universitas Psychologica; Vol 15 No 3 (2016); 1-14 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Ricardo G. Viegas, Armando M. Oliveira Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Ricardo G. Viegas, Armando M. Oliveira Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
PDF application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javeriana instname:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana instacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
instacron_str |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
institution |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
reponame_str |
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana |
collection |
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana |
_version_ |
1803712809931898880 |
spelling |
Comparing adults and adolescents regarding the scope insensitivity of value curves: A functional measurement approachComparación de adultos y adolescentes con respecto al alcance de insensibilidad de las curvas de valor: Un método de medición de funcionamientoViegas, Ricardo G.Oliveira, Armando M.Gaspar Viegas, RicardoThe curvature of the value/utility function has been understood, since D. Bernouilli, as the expression of an attitude towards risk. This perspectivewas kept in such influential theories of judgment and decision as Prospect Theory, in both its original and cumulative versions (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1992). More recently, dualprocess interpretations of the value function as a mix of affect and deliberation (Hsee & Rottenstreich, 2004) have proposed that function curvature reflects the operation of affect-based evaluations via an affective focus coefficient indexed by “α” (varying between 0 and 1) in the equation v = A αS 1-α (with “v” the subjective value, “A” the intensity of the affective response, and “S” the scope of the stimuli). According to this view, evaluating more hedonic targets results in more curved (scopeinsensitive) functions than evaluating instrumental/utilitarian targets, and more affect-oriented subjects exhibit more pronounced curvatures (lower 1α) than deliberation-oriented subjects. These predictions are evaluated in this study and additionally used for an exploratory evaluation of Reyna and Farley’s (2006, 2007) proposal that analytical processing and gist/affect-based processing predominate, respectively, in adolescents’ and in adults’ judgment and decision making. Information Integration Theory was used to establish a model allowing for the functional measurement of subjective value at the (ratio) level required for comparing curvature parameters and computing Loss Aversion coefficients. The outcomes partially favored the prediction of larger curvatures (lower 1- α) and larger loss aversion in more hedonic tasks. However, they did not support the prediction of more scope insensitivity and larger values of loss aversion in adults than in adolescents. As the main suggested difference between adults and adolescents, individual differences in risk attitude appeared to be less polarized towards loss aversion among adolescents in more hedonic tasks.La curva de la función valor/utilidad ha sido comprendida, desde D. Bernouilli, como la expresión de una actitud frente a un riesgo. Este punto de vista se mantuvo vigente en teorías influyentes del juicio y la toma de decisiones en la denominada Teoría de la Perspectiva, tanto en sus versiones originales como las subsecuentes (Kahneman y Tversky, 1979; Tversky y Kahneman, 1992). Más recientemente, las interpretaciones sobre el proceso dual de la función de valor que se muestran como una mezcla entre el afecto y la deliberación (Hsee y Rottenstreich, 2004) han propuesto que la función de la curva representa las evaluaciones basadas en el afecto a través de un coeficiente de enfoque afectivo incluido como "α" (que varía entre 0 y 1) en la ecuación v = A αS 1-α (donde "v" es valor subjetivo, "A" es la intensidad de la respuesta afectiva, y "S" es el alcance real de los estímulos). De acuerdo con este punto de vista, la evaluación de los resultados de los más hedonistas muestra una función más encurvada ( insensibilidad al alcance) que la evaluación de los instrumentales / utilitarios, y los más orientados por el afecto muestran una curvatura más pronunciada (inferior 1-α) que los sujetos orientados a la deliberación. Estas predicciones son evaluadas en este estudio y además utilizadas para una evaluación exploratoria de la propuesta de Reyna y Farley (2006, 2007) en la que predomina el procesamiento analítico y el procesamiento síntesis/basado en el afecto, respectivamente, en los juicios y toma de decisiones de los adolescentes y de los adultos. La Teoría de Integración de la Información se utilizó para establecer un modelo apropiado para la medición funcional del valor subjetivo (índice) del nivel requerido para comparar los parámetros de curvatura y calcular los coeficientes de Aversión a la Pérdida. Los resultados favorecieron parcialmente la predicción de curvaturas más grandes (menores que 1- α) y mayor aversión a las pérdidas en las tareas más hedonistas. Sin embargo, no apoyaban la predicción de mayor alcance de insensibilidad y grandes valores de aversión a las pérdidas en los adultos que en los adolescentes. Los resultados más importantes sugieren una diferencia entre adultos y adolescentes, las diferencias individuales de la actitud ante el riesgo parecieron ser menos polarizadas frente a la aversión a las pérdidas entre los adolescentes en tareas más hedonistas.Pontificia Universidad Javeriana2020-04-15T18:28:06Z2020-04-15T18:28:06Z2016-10-07http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo revisado por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPDFapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/1676810.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.caar2011-27771657-9267http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33090enghttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768/14406http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16768/14688Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2016); 1-14Universitas Psychologica; Vol 15 No 3 (2016); 1-14Derechos de autor 2016 Ricardo G. Viegas, Armando M. OliveiraAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javerianainstname:Pontificia Universidad Javerianainstacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana2023-03-29T19:24:57Z |