Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample
Consistent with current emotion theory, we should note that contempt is not a homogeneous category but rather shows intracategorial variability. Previous research on Spanish samples shows a communicative structure in which contempt is felt towards intimate, social or abstract receivers, for reciproc...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- article
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2012
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/33202
- Acceso en línea:
- http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2174
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33202
- Palabra clave:
- Validez de constructo, asco, desprecio, reconomiento emocional.
Construct Validity, Contempt, Disgust, Emotion Recognition.
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
id |
JAVERIANA_49ae95cf57c0a47e876d3096a99aff30 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/33202 |
network_acronym_str |
JAVERIANA |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous SampleVariedades intracategoriales del desprecio en una muestra heterogéneaDelgado, Ana R.; Universidad de Salamanca, SpainMarquez, Margarita G.; Universidad de SalamancaValidez de constructo, asco, desprecio, reconomiento emocional.Construct Validity, Contempt, Disgust, Emotion Recognition.Consistent with current emotion theory, we should note that contempt is not a homogeneous category but rather shows intracategorial variability. Previous research on Spanish samples shows a communicative structure in which contempt is felt towards intimate, social or abstract receivers, for reciprocal, altruistic or prejudiced reasons. Our objective was to test, on a large and heterogeneous sample, the previously found structure and variations of the experience of contempt as well as its spontaneous facial expression. Testing the association of contempt varieties with certain subject attributes was a secondary goal. Results from 130 participants from the Spanish general population corroborated the previously found structure and varieties, as well as the associations between contempt receiver and attribution. No relation was found with sex, age or emotion recognition ability. As to spontaneous facial expression, disgust was more often expressed by those who narrated their personal episodes of contempt for reciprocal reasons, and was less often expressed by the people who described prejudiced scenarios. This result indicates that the conventionally considered facial expression of contempt is not the only one, as already stated by Darwin, and should not be considered as such by experimental and psychometric procedures.De forma consistente con las teorías actuales de la emoción, el desprecio no es una categoría homogénea, sino que presenta variedad intracategorial. La investigación previa en muestras españolas muestra una estructura comunicativa en la que el desprecio se experimenta hacia receptores íntimos, sociales o abstractos por razones recíprocas, altruistas o prejuiciosas. Nuestro objetivo fue poner a prueba, en una muestra grande y heterogénea, la estructura previamente encontrada para la experiencia de desprecio, así como sus variedades y expresión facial espontánea. Un objetivo secundario fue la puesta a prueba de la asociación de las variedades del desprecio con atributos de sujeto. Los resultados de 130 entrevistas procedentes de población general española corroboraron la estructura y variedades previamente halladas, así como la asociación entre el receptor del desprecio y la atribución causal. La relación con el sexo, la edad y la aptitud de reconocimiento emocional no resultó significativa. Con respecto a la expresión facial, la de asco apareció con mayor frecuencia en quienes narraron episodios de desprecio por razones de reciprocidad y con menor frecuencia en quienes describieron escenarios prejuiciosos. Este resultado indica que la expresión convencionalmente considerada como de desprecio no es la única, como ya estableció Darwin, por lo que no debería considerarse como tal en los procedimientos experimentales y psicométricos.Pontificia Universidad Javerianaresearch grant MICINN PSI2009-09490null2018-02-24T16:05:23Z2020-04-15T18:28:59Z2018-02-24T16:05:23Z2020-04-15T18:28:59Z2012-09-26http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPDFapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/21742011-27771657-9267http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33202spahttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2174/4833Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 12, Núm. 2 (2013); 357-362Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javerianainstname:Pontificia Universidad Javerianainstacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana2023-03-29T19:26:59Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample Variedades intracategoriales del desprecio en una muestra heterogénea |
title |
Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample |
spellingShingle |
Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample Delgado, Ana R.; Universidad de Salamanca, Spain Validez de constructo, asco, desprecio, reconomiento emocional. Construct Validity, Contempt, Disgust, Emotion Recognition. |
title_short |
Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample |
title_full |
Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample |
title_fullStr |
Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample |
title_sort |
Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Delgado, Ana R.; Universidad de Salamanca, Spain Marquez, Margarita G.; Universidad de Salamanca |
author |
Delgado, Ana R.; Universidad de Salamanca, Spain |
author_facet |
Delgado, Ana R.; Universidad de Salamanca, Spain Marquez, Margarita G.; Universidad de Salamanca |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marquez, Margarita G.; Universidad de Salamanca |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
research grant MICINN PSI2009-09490 null |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Validez de constructo, asco, desprecio, reconomiento emocional. Construct Validity, Contempt, Disgust, Emotion Recognition. |
topic |
Validez de constructo, asco, desprecio, reconomiento emocional. Construct Validity, Contempt, Disgust, Emotion Recognition. |
description |
Consistent with current emotion theory, we should note that contempt is not a homogeneous category but rather shows intracategorial variability. Previous research on Spanish samples shows a communicative structure in which contempt is felt towards intimate, social or abstract receivers, for reciprocal, altruistic or prejudiced reasons. Our objective was to test, on a large and heterogeneous sample, the previously found structure and variations of the experience of contempt as well as its spontaneous facial expression. Testing the association of contempt varieties with certain subject attributes was a secondary goal. Results from 130 participants from the Spanish general population corroborated the previously found structure and varieties, as well as the associations between contempt receiver and attribution. No relation was found with sex, age or emotion recognition ability. As to spontaneous facial expression, disgust was more often expressed by those who narrated their personal episodes of contempt for reciprocal reasons, and was less often expressed by the people who described prejudiced scenarios. This result indicates that the conventionally considered facial expression of contempt is not the only one, as already stated by Darwin, and should not be considered as such by experimental and psychometric procedures. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-26 2018-02-24T16:05:23Z 2018-02-24T16:05:23Z 2020-04-15T18:28:59Z 2020-04-15T18:28:59Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2174 2011-2777 1657-9267 http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33202 |
url |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2174 http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33202 |
identifier_str_mv |
2011-2777 1657-9267 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2174/4833 Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 12, Núm. 2 (2013); 357-362 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
PDF application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javeriana instname:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana instacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
instacron_str |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
institution |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
reponame_str |
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana |
collection |
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana |
_version_ |
1803712836958945280 |