Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample

Consistent with current emotion theory, we should note that contempt is not a homogeneous category but rather shows intracategorial variability. Previous research on Spanish samples shows a communicative structure in which contempt is felt towards intimate, social or abstract receivers, for reciproc...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
article
Fecha de publicación:
2012
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/33202
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2174
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33202
Palabra clave:
Validez de constructo, asco, desprecio, reconomiento emocional.
Construct Validity, Contempt, Disgust, Emotion Recognition.
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
id JAVERIANA_49ae95cf57c0a47e876d3096a99aff30
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/33202
network_acronym_str JAVERIANA
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
repository_id_str
spelling Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous SampleVariedades intracategoriales del desprecio en una muestra heterogéneaDelgado, Ana R.; Universidad de Salamanca, SpainMarquez, Margarita G.; Universidad de SalamancaValidez de constructo, asco, desprecio, reconomiento emocional.Construct Validity, Contempt, Disgust, Emotion Recognition.Consistent with current emotion theory, we should note that contempt is not a homogeneous category but rather shows intracategorial variability. Previous research on Spanish samples shows a communicative structure in which contempt is felt towards intimate, social or abstract receivers, for reciprocal, altruistic or prejudiced reasons. Our objective was to test, on a large and heterogeneous sample, the previously found structure and variations of the experience of contempt as well as its spontaneous facial expression. Testing the association of contempt varieties with certain subject attributes was a secondary goal. Results from 130 participants from the Spanish general population corroborated the previously found structure and varieties, as well as the associations between contempt receiver and attribution. No relation was found with sex, age or emotion recognition ability. As to spontaneous facial expression, disgust was more often expressed by those who narrated their personal episodes of contempt for reciprocal reasons, and was less often expressed by the people who described prejudiced scenarios. This result indicates that the conventionally considered facial expression of contempt is not the only one, as already stated by Darwin, and should not be considered as such by experimental and psychometric procedures.De forma consistente con las teorías actuales de la emoción, el desprecio no es una categoría homogénea, sino que presenta variedad intracategorial. La investigación previa en muestras españolas muestra una estructura comunicativa en la que el desprecio se experimenta hacia receptores íntimos, sociales o abstractos por razones recíprocas, altruistas o prejuiciosas. Nuestro objetivo fue poner a prueba, en una muestra grande y heterogénea, la estructura previamente encontrada para la experiencia de desprecio, así como sus variedades y expresión facial espontánea. Un objetivo secundario fue la puesta a prueba de la asociación de las variedades del desprecio con atributos de sujeto. Los resultados de 130 entrevistas procedentes de población general española corroboraron la estructura y variedades previamente halladas, así como la asociación entre el receptor del desprecio y la atribución causal. La relación con el sexo, la edad y la aptitud de reconocimiento emocional no resultó significativa. Con respecto a la expresión facial, la de asco apareció con mayor frecuencia en quienes narraron episodios de desprecio por razones de reciprocidad y con menor frecuencia en quienes describieron escenarios prejuiciosos. Este resultado indica que la expresión convencionalmente considerada como de desprecio no es la única, como ya estableció Darwin, por lo que no debería considerarse como tal en los procedimientos experimentales y psicométricos.Pontificia Universidad Javerianaresearch grant MICINN PSI2009-09490null2018-02-24T16:05:23Z2020-04-15T18:28:59Z2018-02-24T16:05:23Z2020-04-15T18:28:59Z2012-09-26http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPDFapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/21742011-27771657-9267http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33202spahttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2174/4833Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 12, Núm. 2 (2013); 357-362Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javerianainstname:Pontificia Universidad Javerianainstacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana2023-03-29T19:26:59Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample
Variedades intracategoriales del desprecio en una muestra heterogénea
title Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample
spellingShingle Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample
Delgado, Ana R.; Universidad de Salamanca, Spain
Validez de constructo, asco, desprecio, reconomiento emocional.
Construct Validity, Contempt, Disgust, Emotion Recognition.
title_short Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample
title_full Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample
title_fullStr Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample
title_full_unstemmed Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample
title_sort Intracategorial Varieties of Contempt in a Heterogeneous Sample
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Delgado, Ana R.; Universidad de Salamanca, Spain
Marquez, Margarita G.; Universidad de Salamanca
author Delgado, Ana R.; Universidad de Salamanca, Spain
author_facet Delgado, Ana R.; Universidad de Salamanca, Spain
Marquez, Margarita G.; Universidad de Salamanca
author_role author
author2 Marquez, Margarita G.; Universidad de Salamanca
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv research grant MICINN PSI2009-09490
null
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Validez de constructo, asco, desprecio, reconomiento emocional.
Construct Validity, Contempt, Disgust, Emotion Recognition.
topic Validez de constructo, asco, desprecio, reconomiento emocional.
Construct Validity, Contempt, Disgust, Emotion Recognition.
description Consistent with current emotion theory, we should note that contempt is not a homogeneous category but rather shows intracategorial variability. Previous research on Spanish samples shows a communicative structure in which contempt is felt towards intimate, social or abstract receivers, for reciprocal, altruistic or prejudiced reasons. Our objective was to test, on a large and heterogeneous sample, the previously found structure and variations of the experience of contempt as well as its spontaneous facial expression. Testing the association of contempt varieties with certain subject attributes was a secondary goal. Results from 130 participants from the Spanish general population corroborated the previously found structure and varieties, as well as the associations between contempt receiver and attribution. No relation was found with sex, age or emotion recognition ability. As to spontaneous facial expression, disgust was more often expressed by those who narrated their personal episodes of contempt for reciprocal reasons, and was less often expressed by the people who described prejudiced scenarios. This result indicates that the conventionally considered facial expression of contempt is not the only one, as already stated by Darwin, and should not be considered as such by experimental and psychometric procedures.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-09-26
2018-02-24T16:05:23Z
2018-02-24T16:05:23Z
2020-04-15T18:28:59Z
2020-04-15T18:28:59Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
Artículo de revista
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2174
2011-2777
1657-9267
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33202
url http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2174
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33202
identifier_str_mv 2011-2777
1657-9267
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/2174/4833
Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 12, Núm. 2 (2013); 357-362
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv PDF
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
instname:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instacron_str Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
reponame_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
collection Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
_version_ 1803712836958945280