Disciplines for and against Psychology

This paper evaluates the scope and functions of interdisciplinary connections for psychologists in dealing with its conceptual and methodological and sometimes political difficulties. Developing examples from my own context and practice, I indicate how feminist research has engaged with and addresse...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
article
Fecha de publicación:
2012
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/33389
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/1464
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33389
Palabra clave:
Psicología crítica; giro epistemológico; interdisciplinariedad; teoría feminista
Critical psychology; epistemological turn; interdisciplinarity; feminist theory
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
id JAVERIANA_0cf719ba2c1a83a3f71ff7a74d41429e
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/33389
network_acronym_str JAVERIANA
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
repository_id_str
spelling Disciplines for and against PsychologyDisciplinas a favor y en contra de la PsicologíaBurman, Erica; Manchester Metropolitan UniversityPsicología crítica; giro epistemológico; interdisciplinariedad; teoría feministaCritical psychology; epistemological turn; interdisciplinarity; feminist theoryThis paper evaluates the scope and functions of interdisciplinary connections for psychologists in dealing with its conceptual and methodological and sometimes political difficulties. Developing examples from my own context and practice, I indicate how feminist research has engaged with and addressed such questions. Brief consideration of three key epistemological turns in psychology, indicates that psychologists should neither uncritically turn to, nor turn away from, other disciplines but rather understand how what it is within such turns that indicates more about the nature of the conceptual, methodological and political problems we are trying to address.Este artículo evalúa el alcance y las funciones de las conexiones interdisciplinarias para el manejo, por parte de los psicólogos, de sus dificultades conceptuales, metodológicas y algunas veces políticas. Desarrollando ejemplos del propio contexto y práctica de la autora, se señala cómo la investigación feminista ha considerado tales cuestiones y se ha involucrado en ellas. Una breve aproximación a los tres giros epistemológicos claves en Psicología, indica que los psicólogos no deberían acríticamente, ni girar hacia ni apartarse de, otras disciplinas, sino, por el contrario, entender cómo lo que hay en cada giro aporta a la naturaleza de los problemas conceptuales, metodológicos y políticos que se intenta abordar.Pontificia Universidad Javeriananullnull2018-02-24T16:06:10Z2020-04-15T18:30:40Z2018-02-24T16:06:10Z2020-04-15T18:30:40Z2012-01-18http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPDFapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/14642011-27771657-9267http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33389spahttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/1464/2229Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 11, Núm. 2 (2012); 645-662Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javerianainstname:Pontificia Universidad Javerianainstacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana2023-03-29T19:28:36Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disciplines for and against Psychology
Disciplinas a favor y en contra de la Psicología
title Disciplines for and against Psychology
spellingShingle Disciplines for and against Psychology
Burman, Erica; Manchester Metropolitan University
Psicología crítica; giro epistemológico; interdisciplinariedad; teoría feminista
Critical psychology; epistemological turn; interdisciplinarity; feminist theory
title_short Disciplines for and against Psychology
title_full Disciplines for and against Psychology
title_fullStr Disciplines for and against Psychology
title_full_unstemmed Disciplines for and against Psychology
title_sort Disciplines for and against Psychology
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Burman, Erica; Manchester Metropolitan University
author Burman, Erica; Manchester Metropolitan University
author_facet Burman, Erica; Manchester Metropolitan University
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv null
null
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Psicología crítica; giro epistemológico; interdisciplinariedad; teoría feminista
Critical psychology; epistemological turn; interdisciplinarity; feminist theory
topic Psicología crítica; giro epistemológico; interdisciplinariedad; teoría feminista
Critical psychology; epistemological turn; interdisciplinarity; feminist theory
description This paper evaluates the scope and functions of interdisciplinary connections for psychologists in dealing with its conceptual and methodological and sometimes political difficulties. Developing examples from my own context and practice, I indicate how feminist research has engaged with and addressed such questions. Brief consideration of three key epistemological turns in psychology, indicates that psychologists should neither uncritically turn to, nor turn away from, other disciplines but rather understand how what it is within such turns that indicates more about the nature of the conceptual, methodological and political problems we are trying to address.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-18
2018-02-24T16:06:10Z
2018-02-24T16:06:10Z
2020-04-15T18:30:40Z
2020-04-15T18:30:40Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
Artículo de revista
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/1464
2011-2777
1657-9267
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33389
url http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/1464
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33389
identifier_str_mv 2011-2777
1657-9267
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/1464/2229
Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 11, Núm. 2 (2012); 645-662
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv PDF
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
instname:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instacron:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
instacron_str Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
reponame_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
collection Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
_version_ 1803712876315148288

Publicaciones similares