Changes in Scientific Output in Psychology in Iberoamerica in the last Decade

Despite its growth, as shown by López-López (2015), scientific output in Psychology in Iberoamerica, especially in Latin America, is still marginal and lacks the impact that could be expected from the amount of effort and investment put into its creation. This takes into account the increase in coll...

Full description

Autores:
López-López, Wilson
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/32671
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/15727
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32671
Palabra clave:
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
id JAVERIANA2_d132689d4b1ed682d7c64e24e5508ca8
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/32671
network_acronym_str JAVERIANA2
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Changes in Scientific Output in Psychology in Iberoamerica in the last Decade
dc.title.english.eng.fl_str_mv Cambios en la producción regional iberoamericana en psicología en el último decenio
title Changes in Scientific Output in Psychology in Iberoamerica in the last Decade
spellingShingle Changes in Scientific Output in Psychology in Iberoamerica in the last Decade
title_short Changes in Scientific Output in Psychology in Iberoamerica in the last Decade
title_full Changes in Scientific Output in Psychology in Iberoamerica in the last Decade
title_fullStr Changes in Scientific Output in Psychology in Iberoamerica in the last Decade
title_full_unstemmed Changes in Scientific Output in Psychology in Iberoamerica in the last Decade
title_sort Changes in Scientific Output in Psychology in Iberoamerica in the last Decade
dc.creator.fl_str_mv López-López, Wilson
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv López-López, Wilson
description Despite its growth, as shown by López-López (2015), scientific output in Psychology in Iberoamerica, especially in Latin America, is still marginal and lacks the impact that could be expected from the amount of effort and investment put into its creation. This takes into account the increase in collaboration and the overcoming of physical barriers for collaboration (López-López, de Moya Anegón, Acevedo-Triana, Garcia, & Silva, 2015). The current debates show that output in countries such as Spain, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Argentina and Chile, which are the Iberoamerican countries with the largest number of journals covered by JCR (Journal Citation Ranking)– Web of Science from Thompson Reuters and by SJR (Scimago Journal Ranking) from SCOPUS – Elsevier, do not account for the totality of the regional production. Moreover, Latin America is only just starting to see the establishment of a regular cultural practice of citing its production, a process which might take up to 10 years. Nowadays, all the region’s journals are located in the 4th quartile in both systems and it is clear that this situation will probably remain unchanged in the medium term. The growth of open access systems in the region has been exponential. Redalyc, for instance, went from 109 journals in 2004 to 1.057 in 2015 in all areas. This translates into an increase from 7.217 papers in 2004 to 352.305 in 2015. In Psychology, Redalyc covers 84 open-access journals and 32.594 papers. This output, as previously indicated, is not reflected by the international JCR and SJR systems. Resarchers also publish more in those journals. Between 2005 and 2015, the growth has been evident in countries such as Brazil (5.508), Spain (2.103), Colombia (2.103), Mexico (1.589), Argentina (1.411), and Chile (933), and these are the numbers for the most productive countries only. Journal-wise, 15 of the journals carry most of the published papers; some of them have a long history, such as Psicothema (1.138 papers) in Spain, but others are younger, such as Universitas Psychologica in Colombia (745 papers), Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica in Brazil (705 papers), Anales de Psicología in Spain (672 papers), Psicologia e sociedad (666), Psicologia: Ciencia e Profissiao (628). This list is not exhaustive, but the role of Brazilian journals is noteworthy. Most of the production published takes place in the country of origin: this is especially true of Spanish and Brazilian journals. Another relevant element is that regional production has intensified its trend towards collaborative work, with the result that the Psychology of the region has drifted away from the production profile of Humanities, with low collaboration, towards a profile more akin to that of health sciences (López-López et al., 2015). Brazil, Spain and Colombia are the countries with the most collaborative production (Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Vargas-Quesada, Hassan-Montero, González-Molina, & Moya-Anegón, 2009; Guerrero Bote, Olmeda-Gómez, & de Moya-Anegón, 2013). As for download statistics in Psychology from Redalyc, between 2013 and 2014 more than 492.218 papers were downloaded, mostly from Mexico, United States, Spain, Canada and Brazil. This is an interesting preliminary indicator of usage of regional production. The list of countries that publish more includes Peru, Colombia and Costa Rica. And Revista Interoamericana de Psicología, Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología and Universitas Psychologica are the international journals with a regional profile that publish the most outside their countries of origin. The less endogamic country in the region is Colombia, when accounting for total output (Salazar-Acosta, Lucio-Arias, López-López, & Aguado-López, 2013). Colombian journals are open to regional and international production. Some of them have a long tradition, such as the Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología and Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, while some are younger, such as Universitas Psychologica, with a wide and varied scope of production. Nowadays, Universitas Psychologica is an international journal in terms of authors, reviewers, downloads, with thematic diversity. We are visibilizing a sizable part of the production in the region. Ours is a long-term commitment, with challenges and difficulties. We thank everyone for your accompaniment and patience in this project.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-19
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-15T18:25:51Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-15T18:25:51Z
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.hasversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.other.none.fl_str_mv Artículo revisado por pares
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/15727
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2011-2777
1657-9267
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32671
url http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/15727
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32671
identifier_str_mv 2011-2777
1657-9267
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/15727/12638
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 14 Núm. 4 (2015); 1-2
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv Universitas Psychologica; Vol 14 No 4 (2015); 1-2
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Wilson López-López
dc.rights.licence.*.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
Derechos de autor 2016 Wilson López-López
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.spa.fl_str_mv PDF
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@javeriana.edu.co
_version_ 1808389138995478528
spelling Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalDerechos de autor 2016 Wilson López-Lópezhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2López-López, Wilson2020-04-15T18:25:51Z2020-04-15T18:25:51Z2015-08-19http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/157272011-27771657-9267http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32671Despite its growth, as shown by López-López (2015), scientific output in Psychology in Iberoamerica, especially in Latin America, is still marginal and lacks the impact that could be expected from the amount of effort and investment put into its creation. This takes into account the increase in collaboration and the overcoming of physical barriers for collaboration (López-López, de Moya Anegón, Acevedo-Triana, Garcia, & Silva, 2015). The current debates show that output in countries such as Spain, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Argentina and Chile, which are the Iberoamerican countries with the largest number of journals covered by JCR (Journal Citation Ranking)– Web of Science from Thompson Reuters and by SJR (Scimago Journal Ranking) from SCOPUS – Elsevier, do not account for the totality of the regional production. Moreover, Latin America is only just starting to see the establishment of a regular cultural practice of citing its production, a process which might take up to 10 years. Nowadays, all the region’s journals are located in the 4th quartile in both systems and it is clear that this situation will probably remain unchanged in the medium term. The growth of open access systems in the region has been exponential. Redalyc, for instance, went from 109 journals in 2004 to 1.057 in 2015 in all areas. This translates into an increase from 7.217 papers in 2004 to 352.305 in 2015. In Psychology, Redalyc covers 84 open-access journals and 32.594 papers. This output, as previously indicated, is not reflected by the international JCR and SJR systems. Resarchers also publish more in those journals. Between 2005 and 2015, the growth has been evident in countries such as Brazil (5.508), Spain (2.103), Colombia (2.103), Mexico (1.589), Argentina (1.411), and Chile (933), and these are the numbers for the most productive countries only. Journal-wise, 15 of the journals carry most of the published papers; some of them have a long history, such as Psicothema (1.138 papers) in Spain, but others are younger, such as Universitas Psychologica in Colombia (745 papers), Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica in Brazil (705 papers), Anales de Psicología in Spain (672 papers), Psicologia e sociedad (666), Psicologia: Ciencia e Profissiao (628). This list is not exhaustive, but the role of Brazilian journals is noteworthy. Most of the production published takes place in the country of origin: this is especially true of Spanish and Brazilian journals. Another relevant element is that regional production has intensified its trend towards collaborative work, with the result that the Psychology of the region has drifted away from the production profile of Humanities, with low collaboration, towards a profile more akin to that of health sciences (López-López et al., 2015). Brazil, Spain and Colombia are the countries with the most collaborative production (Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Vargas-Quesada, Hassan-Montero, González-Molina, & Moya-Anegón, 2009; Guerrero Bote, Olmeda-Gómez, & de Moya-Anegón, 2013). As for download statistics in Psychology from Redalyc, between 2013 and 2014 more than 492.218 papers were downloaded, mostly from Mexico, United States, Spain, Canada and Brazil. This is an interesting preliminary indicator of usage of regional production. The list of countries that publish more includes Peru, Colombia and Costa Rica. And Revista Interoamericana de Psicología, Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología and Universitas Psychologica are the international journals with a regional profile that publish the most outside their countries of origin. The less endogamic country in the region is Colombia, when accounting for total output (Salazar-Acosta, Lucio-Arias, López-López, & Aguado-López, 2013). Colombian journals are open to regional and international production. Some of them have a long tradition, such as the Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología and Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, while some are younger, such as Universitas Psychologica, with a wide and varied scope of production. Nowadays, Universitas Psychologica is an international journal in terms of authors, reviewers, downloads, with thematic diversity. We are visibilizing a sizable part of the production in the region. Ours is a long-term commitment, with challenges and difficulties. We thank everyone for your accompaniment and patience in this project.La producción de conocimiento en psicología en Iberoamérica y en especial en Latinoamérica aunque creciente como lo muestra López-López (2015) aún es marginal y sin el impacto que podríamos esperar para el esfuerzo y la inversión en recursos que supone la producción del mismo. Esto con el aumento en el proceso de colaboración y superación de barreras físicas para la producción en conjunto (López-López, de Moya Anegón, Acevedo-Triana, Garcia, & Silva, 2015). Los debates que se están generando muestran que la producción de los países como España, Brasil, Colombia, México, Argentina y Chile que cuentan con la mayor cantidad de revistas en el JCR (Journal Citation Ranking)– Web of Science de Thompson Reuters y en el SJR (Scimago Journal Ranking) de SCOPUS - Elsevier no dan cuenta de toda la producción de la región. Más aún, los procesos de incorporación de una práctica cultural regular para la citación de nuestra producción apenas se están incorporando en Latinoamérica y este proceso puede implicar 10 años. Hoy todas las revistas de la región se encuentran en cuartil 4 en los dos sistemas y es claro que esta situación no será fácil de modificar en el mediano plazo. El crecimiento del sistema de acceso abierto en la región ha sido exponencial. Así, Redalyc paso de tener 109 revistas en el año 2004 a 1057 revistas en el 2015 en todas las áreas y pasamos de contar con 7.217 artículos en el 2004 a 352.305 en el 2015 y en psicología hoy contamos con 84 revistas en acceso abierto y 32.594 artículos. Una producción, que como se indicó anteriormente no se refleja en los sistemas internacionales JCR y SJR. La producción de los investigadores en estas revistas en el periodo 2005 al 2015 ha crecido también en especial en países como Brasil (5.508), España (2.103), Colombia (2.103), México (1.589), Argentina (1.411), Chile (933) para no hablar si no de los más productivos. En términos de las revistas 15 revistas publican la mitad de los artículos publicados; algunas con muchos años como Psicothema (1.138 artículos) de España, otras más jóvenes como Universitas Psychologica (745 artículos) de Colombia, Psicología Reflexao e Critica (705 artículos) de Brasil, Anales de Psicología (672 artículos) de España, Psicología e sociedad (666 artículos), psicología ciencia e profissiao (628 artículos) para no nombrar sino algunas. Resalta el papel de las revistas Brasileñas en este conteo. La mayor parte de la producción es del país de origen; esto es así en el caso de las revistas españolas y brasileñas. Otro elemento relevante es que la producción de la región ha intensificado su tendencia a la producción en colaboración hoy la psicología de la región está menos ligada al perfil de producción en Humanidades de carácter poco colaborativo y es más parecido al de ciencias de la salud en colaboración (López-López et al., 2015). Brasil, España y Colombia son los países con más producción colaborativa (Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Vargas-Quesada, Hassan-Montero, González-Molina, & Moya-Anegón, 2009; Guerrero Bote, Olmeda-Gómez, & de Moya-Anegón, 2013). En relación con las descargas a artículos de las revistas de psicología en Redalyc en un periodo de un año (2013 al 2014) se descargaron más de 492.218 artículos y los lugares de mayor cantidad de descargas son México, Estados Unidos, España, Canadá y Brasil. Siendo este un buen indicador preliminar de consumo de la producción regional. En cuanto a los países que publican más tenemos a Perú, Colombia y Costarrica. Y revistas de orden internacional de tipo regional como la Revista Interamericana de Psicóloga y la Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología son las que publican más artículos fuera del país de edición de la revista seguidas por la revista Universitas Psychologica. El país menos endogámico de la región es Colombia en relación con el total de producción (Salazar-Acosta, Lucio-Arias, López-López, & Aguado-López, 2013). Las revistas colombianas están abiertas a la producción regional e internacional algunas con mucha tradición como la Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología y Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana y otras más jóvenes como Universitas Psychologica esta última con un perfil amplio y variado de producción. Universitas Psychologica es hoy una revista que es internacional en autores, en evaluadores, en descargas, es temáticamente diversa, hoy estamos haciendo visible una buena parte de la producción de la región. Nuestra apuesta, es de largo plazo y por supuesto llena de dificultades y exigencias. Agradecemos a todos la comprensión y paciencia por acompañarnos en este proyecto de todos.PDFapplication/pdfspaPontificia Universidad Javerianahttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/15727/12638Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 14 Núm. 4 (2015); 1-2Universitas Psychologica; Vol 14 No 4 (2015); 1-2Changes in Scientific Output in Psychology in Iberoamerica in the last DecadeCambios en la producción regional iberoamericana en psicología en el último deceniohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo revisado por pares10554/32671oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/326712023-03-29 14:27:36.788Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javerianarepositorio@javeriana.edu.co