Decision making in the end-of-life care ofpatients who are terminally ill with cancer–a qualitative descriptive study with aphenomenological approach from theexperience of healthcare workers

Background: In Colombia, recent legislation regarding end-of-life decisions includes palliative sedation, advance directives and euthanasia. We analysed which aspects influence health professionals´ decisions regarding end-of-life medical decisions and care for cancer patients. Methods: Qualitative...

Full description

Autores:
Luna-Meza, Angela
Godoy-Casasbuenas, Natalia
Calvache, José Andrés
Díaz-Amado, Eduardo
Gempeler Rueda, Fritz E.
Morales, Olga
Leal, Fabian
Gómez-Restrepo, Carlos
de Vries, Esther
Tipo de recurso:
Article of data
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/59010
Acceso en línea:
https://bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12904-021-00768-5
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/59010
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00768-5
Palabra clave:
Neoplasias
Cuidado terminal
Cuidados paliativos
Muerte
Colombia
Neoplasms
Terminal care
Palliative care
Death
Colombia
Rights
License
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Description
Summary:Background: In Colombia, recent legislation regarding end-of-life decisions includes palliative sedation, advance directives and euthanasia. We analysed which aspects influence health professionals´ decisions regarding end-of-life medical decisions and care for cancer patients. Methods: Qualitative descriptive–exploratory study based on phenomenology using semi-structured interviews. We interviewed 28 oncologists, palliative care specialists, general practitioners and nurses from three major Colombian institutions, all involved in end-of-life care of cancer patients: Hospital Universitario San Ignacio and Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Bogotá and Hospital Universitario San José in Popayan. Results: When making decisions regarding end-of-life care, professionals consider: 1. Patient’s clinical condition, cultural and social context, in particular treating indigenous patients requires special skills. 2. Professional skills and expertise: training in palliative care and experience in discussing end-of-life options and fear of legal consequences. Physicians indicate that many patients deny their imminent death which hampers shared decision-making and conversations. They mention frequent ambiguity regarding who initiates conversations regarding end-of-life decisions with patients and who finally takes decisions. Patients rarely initiate such conversations and the professionals normally do not ask patients directly for their preferences. Fear of confrontation with family members and lawsuits leads healthcare workers to carry out interventions such as initiating artificial feeding techniques and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, even in the absence of expected benefits. The opinions regarding the acceptability of palliative sedation, euthanasia and use of medications to accelerate death without the patients´ explicit request vary greatly. 3. Conditions of the insurance system: limitations exist in the offer of oncology and palliative care services for important proportions of the Colombian population. Colombians have access to opioid medications, barriers to their application are largely in delivery by the health system, the requirement of trained personnel for intravenous administration and ambulatory and home care plans which in Colombia are rare. Conclusions: To improve end-of-life decision making, Colombian healthcare workers and patients need to openly discuss wishes, needs and care options and prepare caregivers. Promotion of palliative care education and development of palliative care centres and home care plans is necessary to facilitate access to end-of-life care. Patients and caregivers’ perspectives are needed to complement physicians’ perceptions and practices.