Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?
Faces and bodies are typically seen together in most social interactions, rendering probable that facial and bodily expressions are perceived and eventually processed simultaneously. The methodology of Information Integration Theory and Functional Measurement was used here to address the following q...
- Autores:
-
Duarte Silva, Ana
Oliveira, Armando M.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/32423
- Acceso en línea:
- http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32423
- Palabra clave:
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
id |
JAVERIANA2_102f2efc69f83322e5753b5c531f821d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/32423 |
network_acronym_str |
JAVERIANA2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions? |
dc.title.english.eng.fl_str_mv |
¿Las caras y posturas corporales se integran de forma similar para distintas emociones, las clases de emoción y dimensiones del juicio? |
title |
Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions? |
spellingShingle |
Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions? |
title_short |
Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions? |
title_full |
Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions? |
title_fullStr |
Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions? |
title_sort |
Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions? |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Duarte Silva, Ana Oliveira, Armando M. |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Duarte Silva, Ana Oliveira, Armando M. |
description |
Faces and bodies are typically seen together in most social interactions, rendering probable that facial and bodily expressions are perceived and eventually processed simultaneously. The methodology of Information Integration Theory and Functional Measurement was used here to address the following questions: Under what rules do facial and bodily information integrate in judgments over different dimensions of so-called basic and self-conscious emotions? How does relative importance of face and body vary across emotions and judgment dimensions? Does the relative importance of face and body afford a basis for distinguishing between basic and self-conscious emotions? Three basic (happiness, anger, sadness) and two social self-conscious emotions (shame and pride) were considered in this study. Manipulated factors were 3-D realistic facial expressions (varied across 5 levels of intensity) and synthetic 3-D realistic body postures (3 levels of intensity). Different groups of participants judged expressed intensity, valence, or arousal of the combined presentations of face and body, meaning that judgment dimension was varied between-subjects. With the exception of arousal judgments, averaging was the predominant integration rule. Relative importance of face and body was found to vary as a function of judgment dimension, specific emotions and, for judgments of arousal only, type of emotion (basic versus self-conscious). |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-07 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-15T18:25:07Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-15T18:25:07Z |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.hasversion.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.other.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo revisado por pares |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.fbis |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-2777 1657-9267 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32423 |
url |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766 http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32423 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.fbis 2011-2777 1657-9267 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766/14404 http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766/14686 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2016); 1-21 |
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv |
Universitas Psychologica; Vol 15 No 3 (2016); 1-21 |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Ana Duarte Silva, Armando M. Oliveira |
dc.rights.licence.*.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional Derechos de autor 2016 Ana Duarte Silva, Armando M. Oliveira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.spa.fl_str_mv |
PDF |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
institution |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@javeriana.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814338118367576064 |
spelling |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalDerechos de autor 2016 Ana Duarte Silva, Armando M. Oliveirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Duarte Silva, AnaOliveira, Armando M.2020-04-15T18:25:07Z2020-04-15T18:25:07Z2016-10-07http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/1676610.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.fbis2011-27771657-9267http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32423Faces and bodies are typically seen together in most social interactions, rendering probable that facial and bodily expressions are perceived and eventually processed simultaneously. The methodology of Information Integration Theory and Functional Measurement was used here to address the following questions: Under what rules do facial and bodily information integrate in judgments over different dimensions of so-called basic and self-conscious emotions? How does relative importance of face and body vary across emotions and judgment dimensions? Does the relative importance of face and body afford a basis for distinguishing between basic and self-conscious emotions? Three basic (happiness, anger, sadness) and two social self-conscious emotions (shame and pride) were considered in this study. Manipulated factors were 3-D realistic facial expressions (varied across 5 levels of intensity) and synthetic 3-D realistic body postures (3 levels of intensity). Different groups of participants judged expressed intensity, valence, or arousal of the combined presentations of face and body, meaning that judgment dimension was varied between-subjects. With the exception of arousal judgments, averaging was the predominant integration rule. Relative importance of face and body was found to vary as a function of judgment dimension, specific emotions and, for judgments of arousal only, type of emotion (basic versus self-conscious).Caras y cuerpos son típicamente observados en conjunto en muchas de las interacciones sociales, haciendo probable que tanto las expresiones faciales como las expresiones corporales sean percibidas y eventualmente procesadas simultaneamente. La metodología de la Teoría de Integración de la Información y la Medición Funcional fue usada en este estudio para contestar las siguientes preguntas: ¿bajo qué reglas son integradas las informaciones faciales y corporales en los juicios sobre diferentes dimensiones de las llamadas emociones autoconcientes?, ¿cómo la importáncia relativa de la cara y del cuerpo varían a través de las emociones y las dimensiones de los juicios? ¿La importancia relativa de la cara y del cuerpo permiten tener una base para para diferenciar entre las emociones básicas y las autoconcientes? En este estudio se consideraron tres emociones básicas (felicidad, ira y tristeza) y dos emociones autoconcientes (vergüenza y orgullo). Los factores manipulados fueron las expresiones faciales realistas en modelos de 3D (variadas a través e 5 niveles de intensidad) y posiciones corporales realistas en modelos de 3D (que variaron en 3 niveles de intensidad). Diferentes grupos de participantes juzgaron la intensidad de las expresiones, la valencia, o la estimulación de las diferentes presentaciones de combinaciones de caras y cuerpos, el significado de las dimensiones del juicio fue variado entresujetos. Con excepción de los juicios sobre la estimulación, la regla de integración del promedio fue la predominante. La importancia relativa de la cara y del cuerpo fueron observadas al variar en función de las dimensiones del juicio, de las emociones específicas y, en el caso de los juicios de estimulación solo para un tipo de emoción (básicas versus autoconscientes).PDFapplication/pdftext/htmlspaPontificia Universidad Javerianahttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766/14404http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766/14686Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2016); 1-21Universitas Psychologica; Vol 15 No 3 (2016); 1-21Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?¿Las caras y posturas corporales se integran de forma similar para distintas emociones, las clases de emoción y dimensiones del juicio?http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo revisado por pares10554/32423oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/324232023-03-29 14:25:54.33Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javerianarepositorio@javeriana.edu.co |