Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?

Faces and bodies are typically seen together in most social interactions, rendering probable that facial and bodily expressions are perceived and eventually processed simultaneously. The methodology of Information Integration Theory and Functional Measurement was used here to address the following q...

Full description

Autores:
Duarte Silva, Ana
Oliveira, Armando M.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/32423
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32423
Palabra clave:
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
id JAVERIANA2_102f2efc69f83322e5753b5c531f821d
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/32423
network_acronym_str JAVERIANA2
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?
dc.title.english.eng.fl_str_mv ¿Las caras y posturas corporales se integran de forma similar para distintas emociones, las clases de emoción y dimensiones del juicio?
title Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?
spellingShingle Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?
title_short Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?
title_full Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?
title_fullStr Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?
title_full_unstemmed Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?
title_sort Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Duarte Silva, Ana
Oliveira, Armando M.
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Duarte Silva, Ana
Oliveira, Armando M.
description Faces and bodies are typically seen together in most social interactions, rendering probable that facial and bodily expressions are perceived and eventually processed simultaneously. The methodology of Information Integration Theory and Functional Measurement was used here to address the following questions: Under what rules do facial and bodily information integrate in judgments over different dimensions of so-called basic and self-conscious emotions? How does relative importance of face and body vary across emotions and judgment dimensions? Does the relative importance of face and body afford a basis for distinguishing between basic and self-conscious emotions? Three basic (happiness, anger, sadness) and two social self-conscious emotions (shame and pride) were considered in this study. Manipulated factors were 3-D realistic facial expressions (varied across 5 levels of intensity) and synthetic 3-D realistic body postures (3 levels of intensity). Different groups of participants judged expressed intensity, valence, or arousal of the combined presentations of face and body, meaning that judgment dimension was varied between-subjects. With the exception of arousal judgments, averaging was the predominant integration rule. Relative importance of face and body was found to vary as a function of judgment dimension, specific emotions and, for judgments of arousal only, type of emotion (basic versus self-conscious).
publishDate 2016
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-07
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-15T18:25:07Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-15T18:25:07Z
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.hasversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.other.none.fl_str_mv Artículo revisado por pares
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766
10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.fbis
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2011-2777
1657-9267
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32423
url http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32423
identifier_str_mv 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.fbis
2011-2777
1657-9267
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766/14404
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766/14686
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2016); 1-21
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv Universitas Psychologica; Vol 15 No 3 (2016); 1-21
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Ana Duarte Silva, Armando M. Oliveira
dc.rights.licence.*.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
Derechos de autor 2016 Ana Duarte Silva, Armando M. Oliveira
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.spa.fl_str_mv PDF
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@javeriana.edu.co
_version_ 1814338118367576064
spelling Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 InternacionalDerechos de autor 2016 Ana Duarte Silva, Armando M. Oliveirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Duarte Silva, AnaOliveira, Armando M.2020-04-15T18:25:07Z2020-04-15T18:25:07Z2016-10-07http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/1676610.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.fbis2011-27771657-9267http://hdl.handle.net/10554/32423Faces and bodies are typically seen together in most social interactions, rendering probable that facial and bodily expressions are perceived and eventually processed simultaneously. The methodology of Information Integration Theory and Functional Measurement was used here to address the following questions: Under what rules do facial and bodily information integrate in judgments over different dimensions of so-called basic and self-conscious emotions? How does relative importance of face and body vary across emotions and judgment dimensions? Does the relative importance of face and body afford a basis for distinguishing between basic and self-conscious emotions? Three basic (happiness, anger, sadness) and two social self-conscious emotions (shame and pride) were considered in this study. Manipulated factors were 3-D realistic facial expressions (varied across 5 levels of intensity) and synthetic 3-D realistic body postures (3 levels of intensity). Different groups of participants judged expressed intensity, valence, or arousal of the combined presentations of face and body, meaning that judgment dimension was varied between-subjects. With the exception of arousal judgments, averaging was the predominant integration rule. Relative importance of face and body was found to vary as a function of judgment dimension, specific emotions and, for judgments of arousal only, type of emotion (basic versus self-conscious).Caras y cuerpos son típicamente observados en conjunto en muchas de las interacciones sociales, haciendo probable que tanto las expresiones faciales como las expresiones corporales sean percibidas y eventualmente procesadas simultaneamente. La metodología de la Teoría de Integración de la Información y la Medición Funcional fue usada en este estudio para contestar las siguientes preguntas: ¿bajo qué reglas son integradas las informaciones faciales y corporales en los juicios sobre diferentes dimensiones de las llamadas emociones autoconcientes?, ¿cómo la importáncia relativa de la cara y del cuerpo varían a través de las emociones y las dimensiones de los juicios? ¿La importancia relativa de la cara y del cuerpo permiten tener una base para para diferenciar entre las emociones básicas y las autoconcientes? En este estudio se consideraron tres emociones básicas (felicidad, ira y tristeza) y dos emociones autoconcientes (vergüenza y orgullo). Los factores manipulados fueron las expresiones faciales realistas en modelos de 3D (variadas a través e 5 niveles de intensidad) y posiciones corporales realistas en modelos de 3D (que variaron en 3 niveles de intensidad). Diferentes grupos de participantes juzgaron la intensidad de las expresiones, la valencia, o la estimulación de las diferentes presentaciones de combinaciones de caras y cuerpos, el significado de las dimensiones del juicio fue variado entresujetos. Con excepción de los juicios sobre la estimulación, la regla de integración del promedio fue la predominante. La importancia relativa de la cara y del cuerpo fueron observadas al variar en función de las dimensiones del juicio, de las emociones específicas y, en el caso de los juicios de estimulación solo para un tipo de emoción (básicas versus autoconscientes).PDFapplication/pdftext/htmlspaPontificia Universidad Javerianahttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766/14404http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/16766/14686Universitas Psychologica; Vol. 15 Núm. 3 (2016); 1-21Universitas Psychologica; Vol 15 No 3 (2016); 1-21Do faces and body postures integrate similarly for distinct emotions, kinds of emotion and judgent dimensions?¿Las caras y posturas corporales se integran de forma similar para distintas emociones, las clases de emoción y dimensiones del juicio?http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículo revisado por pares10554/32423oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/324232023-03-29 14:25:54.33Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javerianarepositorio@javeriana.edu.co