Should microcirculation monitoring be used to guide fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis and septic shock?

Tissue hypoperfusion and subsequent limited oxygen transport are critical features conducting to organ failure during shock states. Therefore, early identification of tissue hypoperfusion and adequate resuscitation are key for improving the probability of survival after septic shock. (1,2) However,...

Full description

Autores:
Ospina Tascón, Gustavo Adolfo
Madriñán Navia, Humberto
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad ICESI
Repositorio:
Repositorio ICESI
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.icesi.edu.co:10906/81412
Acceso en línea:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20150017
https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84936745477&origin=inward&txGid=4C440BAD8FABCEFEAE78DDFDA1502C0B.wsnAw8kcdt7IPYLO0V48gA%3a1
http://hdl.handle.net/10906/81412
Palabra clave:
Ciencias socio biomédicas
Medical sciences
Microcirculación
Shock séptico
Sepsis bacteriana
Monitorización
Rights
openAccess
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description
Summary:Tissue hypoperfusion and subsequent limited oxygen transport are critical features conducting to organ failure during shock states. Therefore, early identification of tissue hypoperfusion and adequate resuscitation are key for improving the probability of survival after septic shock. (1,2) However, how to identify organ perfusion abnormalities at the bedside and select the type and amount of fluids required to improve tissue hypoxia remain highly controversial. Traditionally, clinical signs, such as reduced blood pressure and urinary output, altered consciousness, and mottled skin, have been used to identify tissue perfusion abnormalities.