Duration data models, unemployment benefits and bias

The design of an efficient Unemployment Compensation System (UCS) is a common concern of policy makers in OECD and transition countries. In most of these countries the UCS is organized in two programmes: unemployment insurance (UI) and, mainly after UI lapse, unemployment assistance (UA), see Atkins...

Full description

Autores:
Mora Rodríguez, Jhon James
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2007
Institución:
Universidad ICESI
Repositorio:
Repositorio ICESI
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.icesi.edu.co:10906/81322
Acceso en línea:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13504850600606000
http://www.tandfonline.com.sci-hub.io/doi/pdf/10.1080/13504850600606000
http://hdl.handle.net/10906/81322
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850600606000
Palabra clave:
Economía
Econometría
Economics
Econometrics models
Rights
openAccess
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description
Summary:The design of an efficient Unemployment Compensation System (UCS) is a common concern of policy makers in OECD and transition countries. In most of these countries the UCS is organized in two programmes: unemployment insurance (UI) and, mainly after UI lapse, unemployment assistance (UA), see Atkinson and Micklewright (1991) for a survey. Traditional approaches analyse the effect of benefits on unemployment duration using only UI data (Stancanelli, 1998; Gonzalo, 2002) or deal with UA data as a mere extension of UI (Stancanelli, 1998, 1999; Alba-Ramirez, 1999; Arranz and Muro, 2004; Juradja, 2004) instead of an analysis that accounts separately for transition rates from UI and UA after UI has expired. The objective of this article is to demonstrate that traditional approaches do not deal with UCS data in a proper way leading thus to biased estimates of unemployment– employment transition probabilities.