A microeconometric analysis of the springboard subsidiary: The case of Spanish firms
This paper provides a microeconometric analysis of the distinctive characteristics of springboard subsidiaries that have a positive impact on the subsidiaries’ performance. Based on panel data estimations for subsidiaries of European multinational companies with a presence in Spain, the authors foun...
- Autores:
-
Marulanda, Carolina Caicedo
Darder, Fidel León
Pla-Barber, José
Mora Rodríguez, Jhon James
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2015
- Institución:
- Universidad ICESI
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio ICESI
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.icesi.edu.co:10906/81725
- Acceso en línea:
- https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84939611974&doi=10.5018%2feconomics-ejournal.ja.2015-23&partnerID=40&md5=ab9739dab2f0c558a9b771a2461b5fbf
http://hdl.handle.net/10906/81725
http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2015-23
- Palabra clave:
- Economía
Econometría
Análisis microeconométrico
Economics
Econometrics models
Microeconometric analysis
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Summary: | This paper provides a microeconometric analysis of the distinctive characteristics of springboard subsidiaries that have a positive impact on the subsidiaries’ performance. Based on panel data estimations for subsidiaries of European multinational companies with a presence in Spain, the authors found that if the subsidiary is located in the springboard country, then the performance improvement (increase in profit margin) of the subsidiary is about 49 percentage points. When the Spanish subsidiary is considered a springboard subsidiary, its performance is 7.7 percentage points higher than the performance of other subsidiaries that are not springboard subsidiaries. If the subsidiary has a technological relationship with another subsidiary, its performance is 6.7 percentage points higher than the performance of other subsidiaries that do not have a technological relationship. Finally, when the firm has low autonomy, the performance of the subsidiary is 6.2 percentage points lower than that of firms that are independent or have a high level of autonomy. © Author(s) 2015. |
---|