A systematic review of the key indicators for assessing telehomecare cost-effectiveness.
Telehomecare is considered one of the most successful applications of telehealth. However, despite increasing evidence of telehomecare benefits, the diffusion of these services is still limited. Decision-makers need strong evidence in order to expand the development of telehomecare to various popula...
- Autores:
-
Vergara Rojas, Stephanie
Pierre Gagnon, Marie
- Tipo de recurso:
- Revisión
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2008
- Institución:
- Universidad ICESI
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio ICESI
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.icesi.edu.co:10906/78325
- Acceso en línea:
- http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-57049168750&partnerID=tZOtx3y1
http://hdl.handle.net/10906/78325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2008.0009
- Palabra clave:
- Economía
Econometría
Revisión sistemática
Telesalud
Economics
Econometrics models
Indicadores
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Summary: | Telehomecare is considered one of the most successful applications of telehealth. However, despite increasing evidence of telehomecare benefits, the diffusion of these services is still limited. Decision-makers need strong evidence in order to expand the development of telehomecare to various populations, regions, and health conditions. The objective of this review is to provide a basis for decision-making by identifying common indicators from the literature on telehomecare. A comprehensive review of the literature on the cost-effectiveness of telehomecare was conducted in specialized bibliographic databases. A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. First, selected studies were analyzed to identify and classify the indicators that better addressed the cost-effectiveness impacts of telehomecare projects. Then, a synthesis of the evidence was done by exploring the relative cost-effectiveness of telehomecare applications. The analyses show that there is fair evidence of cost-effectiveness for many telehomecare applications. However, the heterogeneity among cost-effectiveness indicators in the applications reviewed and the methodological limitations of the studies impede the possibility of generalizing the findings. |
---|