Between Democratic Security and Democratic Legality. Constitutional Politics and Presidential Re-election in Colombia
This paper presents an analysis of the political and legal debate of the declaration of unconstitutionality of the referendum that sought the re-election presidential second term in 2010. On the other hand, it exposes the debate between those who spoke of bias and political argument in the court rul...
- Autores:
-
Boesten, Jan
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2014
- Institución:
- Universidad ICESI
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio ICESI
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.icesi.edu.co:10906/77519
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10906/77519
http://www.icesi.edu.co/revistas/index.php/precedente/article/view/1972
http://biblioteca2.icesi.edu.co/cgi-olib/?infile=details.glu&loid=273899
- Palabra clave:
- Seguridad democrática
Producción intelectual registrada - Universidad Icesi
Política
Democracia - Colombia
Colombia - Política
Reelección presidencial
Democratic security
Democratic legality
Presidential re-election
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
| Summary: | This paper presents an analysis of the political and legal debate of the declaration of unconstitutionality of the referendum that sought the re-election presidential second term in 2010. On the other hand, it exposes the debate between those who spoke of bias and political argument in the court ruling related to the idea of “democratic security”; while others speak of the persistence of “democratic legality” consisting of autonomy guaranteed legal reasoning from deliberative processes. Finally, it is noted that the degree of institutionalization of discourse of the Court is an important factor that speaks in favor of it’s independence. |
|---|