Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea

Autores:
Rodríguez, Laritza
Miranda, Angel David
González G., Hector A.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2000
Institución:
Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud - FUCS
Repositorio:
Repositorio Digital Institucional ReDi
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co:001/2144
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/handle/001/2144
https://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v9.n1.2000.229
Palabra clave:
Rights
openAccess
License
Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud FUCS - 2018
id FUCS2_6806078bb16491fc01820d89fc204c75
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co:001/2144
network_acronym_str FUCS2
network_name_str Repositorio Digital Institucional ReDi
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Comparison of two surgical techniques of caesarean section
title Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea
spellingShingle Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea
title_short Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea
title_full Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea
title_fullStr Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea
title_full_unstemmed Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea
title_sort Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Rodríguez, Laritza
Miranda, Angel David
González G., Hector A.
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Rodríguez, Laritza
Miranda, Angel David
González G., Hector A.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2000-06-01 00:00:00
2022-02-21T20:34:34Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2000-06-01
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2000-06-01 00:00:00
2022-02-21T20:34:34Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.31260/RepertMedCir.v9.n1.2000.229
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0121-7372
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/handle/001/2144
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2462-991X
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v9.n1.2000.229
identifier_str_mv 10.31260/RepertMedCir.v9.n1.2000.229
0121-7372
2462-991X
url https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/handle/001/2144
https://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v9.n1.2000.229
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Cunningham, Mac Donald, Gant Leveno. William's Obstetrics; 41 edición. Masson S.A., Barcelona, España, 585 -90.
Hauth JC, Owen J. Transverse Uterine Incision Closure : One versus two layer. AmJ Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct; 167(4): 1108-11.
Federici D, Lacelly B. Cesarean Section using the Misgay Ladach method. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997; 57(3): 273- 79.
Alonso P Walker. Peritoneo Peritonitis y Abscesos Intraabdominales En: Schwars Principios de Cirugía General. Editorial MGH; 1303- 1307.
Ellis H & Reddle R. Does the Peritoneum to be closed at laparotomy. Brit J Surg, 1 1977; 164: 733-6.
Sanders, DiClementi. Principies of abdominal wound closure II. Prevention ofwounddehiscence. Arch Surg. 1997; 112(10): 1188-91.
Hull DB, Varner NW. A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery, Obst Gynecol 1991; 77(6): 818- 21.
Pietrantoni M, -Parsons MT, O'Brien WF, Collins E, Knuppel RA, Spellacy WN. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77(2):293-6.
Nagele F, Karas H, Spitzer D, Staudach A, Karasegh S, Beck A, Husslein P. Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(4):1366-70.
McNally O. Does closure of the peritoneum duringZesarean section influence postoperative morbidity and subsequent bladder adhesion. J Obstet Gynecol, 1997.
Stark M. Technique of caesarean section: The Misgay Ladach method. Women's Health Today. XIV World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics at Montreal. September 1994. si - 85.
Hojberg KE, Aagaard J, Laursen H, Diab L, Secher NJ . Closure versus non -closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Evaluation of pain. A randomized study . Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77 ( 7): 741-5.
Chapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. One versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: (1)16-8.
Tucker JM, Hauth JC, Hodgins P, Owen J, Winkler JL. Trial of labor after a one or two layer closure of a low transverse uterine incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 168(2): 545-6.
Obel J, Younis JS, Lang N, Levit A. Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routline cesarean sections? J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 Nov-Dec; 5(6): 366-9.
Karipineni RC, Wilk PJ, Danese CA. The role of the peritoneum in the healing of abdominal incisions. Surg Gyn Obstet. 1976; 142(5): 729-30.
Irion O, Luzuy F, Beguin E Nonclosure of visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Jul; 103(7): 690-4.
Pridjian G, Hibbard JU, Moawad AH. Cesarean: Changing the trends. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77(2): 195-200.
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/download/229/228
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 1 , Año 2000 : Enero – Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 38
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 34
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 9
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Repertorio de Medicina y Cirugía
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud FUCS - 2018
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud FUCS - 2018
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Hospital de San José y Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/229
institution Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud - FUCS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/bitstreams/237067f9-5dae-41b9-87f2-03811c8d49c4/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 21eab751c42192d671e2896bd3a778a2
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Digital de la Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud
repository.mail.fl_str_mv redi@fucsalud.edu.co
_version_ 1814355560929165312
spelling Rodríguez, Laritza63ff00b2e50d7d350b0627787201a634300Miranda, Angel Davidf514634da0e9530cd5134585034306b1300González G., Hector A.2000ad882796e5e9cba72a284d387bb73002000-06-01 00:00:002022-02-21T20:34:34Z2000-06-012000-06-01 00:00:002022-02-21T20:34:34ZSociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Hospital de San José y Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la SaludFundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud FUCS - 2018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/229Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesáreaComparison of two surgical techniques of caesarean sectionapplication/pdfArtículo de revistaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a8510.31260/RepertMedCir.v9.n1.2000.2290121-7372https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/handle/001/21442462-991Xhttps://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v9.n1.2000.229spaCunningham, Mac Donald, Gant Leveno. William's Obstetrics; 41 edición. Masson S.A., Barcelona, España, 585 -90.Hauth JC, Owen J. Transverse Uterine Incision Closure : One versus two layer. AmJ Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct; 167(4): 1108-11.Federici D, Lacelly B. Cesarean Section using the Misgay Ladach method. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997; 57(3): 273- 79.Alonso P Walker. Peritoneo Peritonitis y Abscesos Intraabdominales En: Schwars Principios de Cirugía General. Editorial MGH; 1303- 1307.Ellis H & Reddle R. Does the Peritoneum to be closed at laparotomy. Brit J Surg, 1 1977; 164: 733-6.Sanders, DiClementi. Principies of abdominal wound closure II. Prevention ofwounddehiscence. Arch Surg. 1997; 112(10): 1188-91.Hull DB, Varner NW. A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery, Obst Gynecol 1991; 77(6): 818- 21.Pietrantoni M, -Parsons MT, O'Brien WF, Collins E, Knuppel RA, Spellacy WN. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77(2):293-6.Nagele F, Karas H, Spitzer D, Staudach A, Karasegh S, Beck A, Husslein P. Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(4):1366-70.McNally O. Does closure of the peritoneum duringZesarean section influence postoperative morbidity and subsequent bladder adhesion. J Obstet Gynecol, 1997.Stark M. Technique of caesarean section: The Misgay Ladach method. Women's Health Today. XIV World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics at Montreal. September 1994. si - 85.Hojberg KE, Aagaard J, Laursen H, Diab L, Secher NJ . Closure versus non -closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Evaluation of pain. A randomized study . Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77 ( 7): 741-5.Chapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. One versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: (1)16-8.Tucker JM, Hauth JC, Hodgins P, Owen J, Winkler JL. Trial of labor after a one or two layer closure of a low transverse uterine incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 168(2): 545-6.Obel J, Younis JS, Lang N, Levit A. Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routline cesarean sections? J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 Nov-Dec; 5(6): 366-9.Karipineni RC, Wilk PJ, Danese CA. The role of the peritoneum in the healing of abdominal incisions. Surg Gyn Obstet. 1976; 142(5): 729-30.Irion O, Luzuy F, Beguin E Nonclosure of visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Jul; 103(7): 690-4.Pridjian G, Hibbard JU, Moawad AH. Cesarean: Changing the trends. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77(2): 195-200.https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/download/229/228Núm. 1 , Año 2000 : Enero – Junio381349Revista Repertorio de Medicina y CirugíaPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2490https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/bitstreams/237067f9-5dae-41b9-87f2-03811c8d49c4/download21eab751c42192d671e2896bd3a778a2MD51001/2144oai:repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co:001/21442024-02-02 13:10:18.802https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud FUCS - 2018metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.coRepositorio Digital de la Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Saludredi@fucsalud.edu.co