Anomalías epiteliales glandulares y la importancia de los diagnósticos diferenciales. Estudio de caso

Autores:: Puerto de Amaya, Myriam Beatriz

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2017

Institución:: Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud - FUCS

Repositorio:: Repositorio Digital Institucional ReDi

Idioma:: spa

id	FUCS2_65fe9c25d8693433746c5977e250ed76
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co:001/2004
network_acronym_str	FUCS2
network_name_str	Repositorio Digital Institucional ReDi
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Anomalías epiteliales glandulares y la importancia de los diagnósticos diferenciales. Estudio de caso
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Glandular epithelial abnormalities and their importance in differential diagnoses: A case study
title	Anomalías epiteliales glandulares y la importancia de los diagnósticos diferenciales. Estudio de caso
spellingShingle	Anomalías epiteliales glandulares y la importancia de los diagnósticos diferenciales. Estudio de caso Citología base líquida Células glandulares atípicas Diagnósticos diferenciales Liquid-based cytology Atypical glandular cells Differential diagnoses
title_short	Anomalías epiteliales glandulares y la importancia de los diagnósticos diferenciales. Estudio de caso
title_full	Anomalías epiteliales glandulares y la importancia de los diagnósticos diferenciales. Estudio de caso
title_fullStr	Anomalías epiteliales glandulares y la importancia de los diagnósticos diferenciales. Estudio de caso
title_full_unstemmed	Anomalías epiteliales glandulares y la importancia de los diagnósticos diferenciales. Estudio de caso
title_sort	Anomalías epiteliales glandulares y la importancia de los diagnósticos diferenciales. Estudio de caso
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Puerto de Amaya, Myriam Beatriz
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Puerto de Amaya, Myriam Beatriz
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Citología base líquida Células glandulares atípicas Diagnósticos diferenciales
topic	Citología base líquida Células glandulares atípicas Diagnósticos diferenciales Liquid-based cytology Atypical glandular cells Differential diagnoses
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Liquid-based cytology Atypical glandular cells Differential diagnoses
publishDate	2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2017-06-01 00:00:00 2022-02-21T20:33:09Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2017-06-01
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2017-06-01 00:00:00 2022-02-21T20:33:09Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0121-7372
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/handle/001/2004
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2462-991X
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/24
identifier_str_mv	0121-7372 2462-991X
url	https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/handle/001/2004 https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/24
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Muñoz N, Hernandez-Suarez G, Méndez F, Molano M, Posso H, Moreno V, et al. Persistence of HPV infection and risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a cohort of Colombian women. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:1184–90. Publicación electrónica 17 Mar 2009. Coste J, Cochand-Priollet B, de Cremoux P, Le Galès C, Cartier I, Molinié V, et al. Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening. BMJ. 2003;326:733. Kim HS, Underwood D. Adenocarcinomas in the cervicovaginal Papanicolaou smear: analysis of a 12-year experience. Diagn Cytopathol. 1991;7:119–24. Johnson JE, Rahemtulla A. Endocervical glandular neoplasia and its mimics in ThinPrep Pap tests A descriptive study. Acta Cytol. 1999;43:369–75. Bansal B, Gupta P, Gupta N, Rajwanshi A, Suri V. Detecting uterine glandular lesions: Role of cervical cytology. Cytojournal. 2016;13:3. Publicación electrónica 22 Feb 2016. Wood MD, Horst JA, Bibbo M. Weeding atypical glandular cell look-alikes from the true atypical lesions in liquid-based Pap test: a review. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:12–7. Simsir A, Hwang S, Cangiarella J, Elgert P, Levine P, Sheffield MV, et al. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin. Cancer. 2003;99:323–30. Zhao C, Austin RM, Pan J, Barr N, Martin SE, Raza A, et al. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells in conventional pap smears in a large, high-risk U S. west coast minority population. Acta Cytol. 2009;53:153–9. Birdsong GG, Davis DD. Calidad de la muestra. En: Solomon D, Nayar R, editores. El Sistema Bethesda para informar la citología cervical Definiciones, criterios y notas aclaratorias. 3. a ed. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Journal; 2017. p. 1–27. Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, Bastian LA, Hasselblad V, Hickey JD, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:810–9. Burja IT, Thompson SK, Sawyer WL, Shurbaji MS. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears A study with cytohistologic correlation. Acta Cytol. 1999;43:351–6. Kim SS, Suh DS, Kim KH, Yoon MS, Choi KU. Clinicopathological significance of atypical glandular cells on Pap smear. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2013;56:76–83. Publicación electrónica 12 Mar 2013. Sharpless KE, Schnatz PF, Mandavilli S, Greene JF, Sorosky JI. Lack of adherence to practice guidelines for women with atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:501–6. Duarte Torres RMCRS. Citipatología endocervical. En: Alonso de Ruiz P, Lazcano Ponce EC, Hernández Avila M, editores. Cáncer cervicouterino: diagnóstico, prevención y control. 2. a ed. México: Medica Panamerica; 2005. p. 91–103. Wilbur DC, Chhieng DC, Guidos B, Mody DR. Anomalías epiteliales glandulares. En: Gg B, Davis DD, editores. El Sistema Bethesda para informar la citología cervical. Definiciones, criterios y notas aclaratorias. 3. a ed. Argentina: Ediciones Jourrnal; 2017. p. 181–225. DiTomasso JP, Ramzy I, Mody DR. Glandular lesions of the cervix Validity of cytologic criteria used to differentiate reactive changes, glandular intraepithelial lesions and adenocarcinoma. Acta Cytol. 1996;40:1127–35. Ghorab Z, Mahmood S, Schinella R. Endocervical reactive atypia: a histologic-cytologic study. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;22:342–6. Wilbur DC. The cytology of the endocervix, endometrium, and upper female genital tract. En: Bonfiglio TA, Erozan YS, editores. Gynecologic cytopathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. p. 107–44. Sharpless KE, O’Sullivan DM, Schnatz PF. The utility of human papillomavirus testing in the management of atypical glandular cells on cytology. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2009;13: 72–8. Raab SS. Can glandular lesions be diagnosed in pap smear cytology? Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;23:127–33. Schnatz PF, Guile M, O’Sullivan DM, Sorosky JI. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:701–8. Chhieng DC, Elgert PA, Cangiarella JF, Cohen JM. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance A follow-up study from an academic medical center. Acta Cytol. 2000;44:557–66. Ronnett BM, Manos MM, Ransley JE, Fetterman BJ, Kinney WK, Hurley LB, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): cytopathologic features, histopathologic results, and human papillomavirus DNA detection. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:816–25. Levine L, Lucci JA, Dinh TV. Atypical glandular cells: new Bethesda Terminology and Management Guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58:399–406. Wang J, Andrae B, Sundström K, Ström P, Ploner A, Elfström KM, et al. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2016:352: i276. Publicación electrónica 11 Feb 2016. Schnatz PF, Pattison K, Mandavilli S, Fiel-Gan M, Elsaccar OA, O’Sullivan DM, et al. Atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology and breast disease: what is the association? J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011;15:189–94. Zhao C, Florea A, Onisko A, Austin RM. Histologic follow-up results in 662 patients with Pap test findings of atypical glandular cells: results from a large academic womens hospital laboratory employing sensitive screening methods. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:383–9. Publicación electrónica 7 Jun 2009. Bulk S, Berkhof J, Bulkmans NW, Zielinski GD, Rozendaal L, van Kemenade FJ, et al. Preferential risk of HPV16 for squamous cell carcinoma and of HPV18 for adenocarcinoma of the cervix compared to women with normal cytology in The Netherlands. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:171–5. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Guía de práctica clínica (GPC) para la detección y manejo de lesiones precancerosas de cuello uterino. Colombia: Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social; 2014. p. 30. Diaz-Montes TP, Farinola MA, Zahurak ML, Bristow RE, Rosenthal DL. Clinical utility of atypical glandular cells (AGC) classification: cytohistologic comparison and relationship to HPV results. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104:366–71. Publicación electrónica 16 Oct 2006. Stoler MH, Raad SS, Wilbur DC. Pruebas complementarias. En: Nayar R, Wilbur DC, editores. El Sistema Bethesda para informar la citología cervical Definiciones, criterios y notas aclaratorias. Argentina: Ediciones Journal; 2017. p. 169–275. Wentzensen N, Schiffman M, Chelmow D, Darragh T, Waxman AG. Evaluación del riesgo para la toma de decisions diagnostic-terapéuticas. En: Nayar R, Wilbur DC, editores. El Sistema Bethesda para informar la citología cervical. Argentina: Ediciones Journal; 2017. p. 287–95.
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/download/24/13
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 2 , Año 2017 : Abril – Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	128
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	121
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	26
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista Repertorio de Medicina y Cirugía
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud-FUCS - 0
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud-FUCS - 0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Hospital de San José y Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/24
institution	Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud - FUCS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/bitstreams/8fa28357-5b7f-45fe-af15-288750abedd3/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	35113651c95ec3005f728fd7335079bf
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Digital de la Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	redi@fucsalud.edu.co
_version_	1814355536139780096
spelling	Puerto de Amaya, Myriam Beatriz15b958bc3c5a9619968338eda99653623002017-06-01 00:00:002022-02-21T20:33:09Z2017-06-012017-06-01 00:00:002022-02-21T20:33:09ZSociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Hospital de San José y Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la SaludFundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud-FUCS - 0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/24Citología base líquidaCélulas glandulares atípicasDiagnósticos diferencialesLiquid-based cytologyAtypical glandular cellsDifferential diagnosesAnomalías epiteliales glandulares y la importancia de los diagnósticos diferenciales. Estudio de casoGlandular epithelial abnormalities and their importance in differential diagnoses: A case studyapplication/pdfArtículo de revistaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a850121-7372https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/handle/001/20042462-991Xhttps://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/24spaFerlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013.Muñoz N, Hernandez-Suarez G, Méndez F, Molano M, Posso H, Moreno V, et al. Persistence of HPV infection and risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a cohort of Colombian women. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:1184–90. Publicación electrónica 17 Mar 2009.Coste J, Cochand-Priollet B, de Cremoux P, Le Galès C, Cartier I, Molinié V, et al. Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening. BMJ. 2003;326:733.Kim HS, Underwood D. Adenocarcinomas in the cervicovaginal Papanicolaou smear: analysis of a 12-year experience. Diagn Cytopathol. 1991;7:119–24.Johnson JE, Rahemtulla A. Endocervical glandular neoplasia and its mimics in ThinPrep Pap tests A descriptive study. Acta Cytol. 1999;43:369–75.Bansal B, Gupta P, Gupta N, Rajwanshi A, Suri V. Detecting uterine glandular lesions: Role of cervical cytology. Cytojournal. 2016;13:3. Publicación electrónica 22 Feb 2016.Wood MD, Horst JA, Bibbo M. Weeding atypical glandular cell look-alikes from the true atypical lesions in liquid-based Pap test: a review. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:12–7.Simsir A, Hwang S, Cangiarella J, Elgert P, Levine P, Sheffield MV, et al. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin. Cancer. 2003;99:323–30.Zhao C, Austin RM, Pan J, Barr N, Martin SE, Raza A, et al. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells in conventional pap smears in a large, high-risk U S. west coast minority population. Acta Cytol. 2009;53:153–9.Birdsong GG, Davis DD. Calidad de la muestra. En: Solomon D, Nayar R, editores. El Sistema Bethesda para informar la citología cervical Definiciones, criterios y notas aclaratorias. 3. a ed. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Journal; 2017. p. 1–27.Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, Bastian LA, Hasselblad V, Hickey JD, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:810–9.Burja IT, Thompson SK, Sawyer WL, Shurbaji MS. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears A study with cytohistologic correlation. Acta Cytol. 1999;43:351–6.Kim SS, Suh DS, Kim KH, Yoon MS, Choi KU. Clinicopathological significance of atypical glandular cells on Pap smear. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2013;56:76–83. Publicación electrónica 12 Mar 2013.Sharpless KE, Schnatz PF, Mandavilli S, Greene JF, Sorosky JI. Lack of adherence to practice guidelines for women with atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:501–6.Duarte Torres RMCRS. Citipatología endocervical. En: Alonso de Ruiz P, Lazcano Ponce EC, Hernández Avila M, editores. Cáncer cervicouterino: diagnóstico, prevención y control. 2. a ed. México: Medica Panamerica; 2005. p. 91–103.Wilbur DC, Chhieng DC, Guidos B, Mody DR. Anomalías epiteliales glandulares. En: Gg B, Davis DD, editores. El Sistema Bethesda para informar la citología cervical. Definiciones, criterios y notas aclaratorias. 3. a ed. Argentina: Ediciones Jourrnal; 2017. p. 181–225.DiTomasso JP, Ramzy I, Mody DR. Glandular lesions of the cervix Validity of cytologic criteria used to differentiate reactive changes, glandular intraepithelial lesions and adenocarcinoma. Acta Cytol. 1996;40:1127–35.Ghorab Z, Mahmood S, Schinella R. Endocervical reactive atypia: a histologic-cytologic study. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;22:342–6.Wilbur DC. The cytology of the endocervix, endometrium, and upper female genital tract. En: Bonfiglio TA, Erozan YS, editores. Gynecologic cytopathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. p. 107–44.Sharpless KE, O’Sullivan DM, Schnatz PF. The utility of human papillomavirus testing in the management of atypical glandular cells on cytology. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2009;13: 72–8.Raab SS. Can glandular lesions be diagnosed in pap smear cytology? Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;23:127–33.Schnatz PF, Guile M, O’Sullivan DM, Sorosky JI. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:701–8.Chhieng DC, Elgert PA, Cangiarella JF, Cohen JM. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance A follow-up study from an academic medical center. Acta Cytol. 2000;44:557–66.Ronnett BM, Manos MM, Ransley JE, Fetterman BJ, Kinney WK, Hurley LB, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): cytopathologic features, histopathologic results, and human papillomavirus DNA detection. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:816–25.Levine L, Lucci JA, Dinh TV. Atypical glandular cells: new Bethesda Terminology and Management Guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58:399–406.Wang J, Andrae B, Sundström K, Ström P, Ploner A, Elfström KM, et al. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2016:352: i276. Publicación electrónica 11 Feb 2016.Schnatz PF, Pattison K, Mandavilli S, Fiel-Gan M, Elsaccar OA, O’Sullivan DM, et al. Atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology and breast disease: what is the association? J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011;15:189–94.Zhao C, Florea A, Onisko A, Austin RM. Histologic follow-up results in 662 patients with Pap test findings of atypical glandular cells: results from a large academic womens hospital laboratory employing sensitive screening methods. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:383–9. Publicación electrónica 7 Jun 2009.Bulk S, Berkhof J, Bulkmans NW, Zielinski GD, Rozendaal L, van Kemenade FJ, et al. Preferential risk of HPV16 for squamous cell carcinoma and of HPV18 for adenocarcinoma of the cervix compared to women with normal cytology in The Netherlands. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:171–5.Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Guía de práctica clínica (GPC) para la detección y manejo de lesiones precancerosas de cuello uterino. Colombia: Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social; 2014. p. 30.Diaz-Montes TP, Farinola MA, Zahurak ML, Bristow RE, Rosenthal DL. Clinical utility of atypical glandular cells (AGC) classification: cytohistologic comparison and relationship to HPV results. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104:366–71. Publicación electrónica 16 Oct 2006.Stoler MH, Raad SS, Wilbur DC. Pruebas complementarias. En: Nayar R, Wilbur DC, editores. El Sistema Bethesda para informar la citología cervical Definiciones, criterios y notas aclaratorias. Argentina: Ediciones Journal; 2017. p. 169–275.Wentzensen N, Schiffman M, Chelmow D, Darragh T, Waxman AG. Evaluación del riesgo para la toma de decisions diagnostic-terapéuticas. En: Nayar R, Wilbur DC, editores. El Sistema Bethesda para informar la citología cervical. Argentina: Ediciones Journal; 2017. p. 287–95.https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/download/24/13Núm. 2 , Año 2017 : Abril – Junio128212126Revista Repertorio de Medicina y CirugíaPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2594https://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/bitstreams/8fa28357-5b7f-45fe-af15-288750abedd3/download35113651c95ec3005f728fd7335079bfMD51001/2004oai:repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co:001/20042024-02-02 13:06:23.03https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud-FUCS - 0metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.coRepositorio Digital de la Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Saludredi@fucsalud.edu.co

Anomalías epiteliales glandulares y la importancia de los diagnósticos diferenciales. Estudio de caso

Publicaciones similares