Modelo de identificación de estrategias para potencializar la generación de patentes a la medida de la Institución de Educación Superior.

La transferencia de conocimiento y tecnología de las universidades contribuye al desarrollo regional y favorece la innovación. El objetivo de este trabajo es proponer un modelo para la selección de estrategias de transferencia adaptadas a las características contextuales de las Instituciones de Educ...

Full description

Autores:
Figueroa Galvis, Neira Yolima
Olaya Escobar, Erika Sofía
Castro Silva, Hugo Fernando
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional ECI
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co:001/1407
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/1407
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242020000200081
Palabra clave:
Transferencia de tecnología- Innovaciones tecnológicas
Tecnología - Educación Superior
Patentes
Tansferencia de conocimiento y tecnología
Instituciones de Educación Superior
Análisis comparativo cualitativo
Patentes
Knowledge and technology transfer
Higher Education Institutions
Qualitative comparative analysis
Patents
Rights
openAccess
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
id ESCUELAIG2_ac5d7005a378f414574bfc6e947a2709
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co:001/1407
network_acronym_str ESCUELAIG2
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional ECI
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Modelo de identificación de estrategias para potencializar la generación de patentes a la medida de la Institución de Educación Superior.
title Modelo de identificación de estrategias para potencializar la generación de patentes a la medida de la Institución de Educación Superior.
spellingShingle Modelo de identificación de estrategias para potencializar la generación de patentes a la medida de la Institución de Educación Superior.
Transferencia de tecnología- Innovaciones tecnológicas
Tecnología - Educación Superior
Patentes
Tansferencia de conocimiento y tecnología
Instituciones de Educación Superior
Análisis comparativo cualitativo
Patentes
Knowledge and technology transfer
Higher Education Institutions
Qualitative comparative analysis
Patents
title_short Modelo de identificación de estrategias para potencializar la generación de patentes a la medida de la Institución de Educación Superior.
title_full Modelo de identificación de estrategias para potencializar la generación de patentes a la medida de la Institución de Educación Superior.
title_fullStr Modelo de identificación de estrategias para potencializar la generación de patentes a la medida de la Institución de Educación Superior.
title_full_unstemmed Modelo de identificación de estrategias para potencializar la generación de patentes a la medida de la Institución de Educación Superior.
title_sort Modelo de identificación de estrategias para potencializar la generación de patentes a la medida de la Institución de Educación Superior.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Figueroa Galvis, Neira Yolima
Olaya Escobar, Erika Sofía
Castro Silva, Hugo Fernando
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Figueroa Galvis, Neira Yolima
Olaya Escobar, Erika Sofía
Castro Silva, Hugo Fernando
dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv Desarrollo y Gerencia Integral de Proyectos
dc.subject.armarc.none.fl_str_mv Transferencia de tecnología- Innovaciones tecnológicas
Tecnología - Educación Superior
Patentes
topic Transferencia de tecnología- Innovaciones tecnológicas
Tecnología - Educación Superior
Patentes
Tansferencia de conocimiento y tecnología
Instituciones de Educación Superior
Análisis comparativo cualitativo
Patentes
Knowledge and technology transfer
Higher Education Institutions
Qualitative comparative analysis
Patents
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv Tansferencia de conocimiento y tecnología
Instituciones de Educación Superior
Análisis comparativo cualitativo
Patentes
Knowledge and technology transfer
Higher Education Institutions
Qualitative comparative analysis
Patents
description La transferencia de conocimiento y tecnología de las universidades contribuye al desarrollo regional y favorece la innovación. El objetivo de este trabajo es proponer un modelo para la selección de estrategias de transferencia adaptadas a las características contextuales de las Instituciones de Educación Superior de Colombia. Para ello, se realizó un Análisis Cualitativo Comparativo (QCA), mediante el cual se identifica la combinación de condiciones de fondo que generan una salida. La medida de desempeño fue el número de patentes de invención otorgadas y la aplicación empírica consideró 184 Instituciones de Educación Superior de Colombia.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-06T23:29:02Z
2021-10-01T17:40:09Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-06
2021-10-01T17:40:09Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0718-2724
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/1407
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.4067/S0718-27242020000200081
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242020000200081
identifier_str_mv 0718-2724
10.4067/S0718-27242020000200081
url https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/1407
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242020000200081
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Vol. 15 No. 2 (2020)
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv 94
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv 81
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 15
dc.relation.indexed.spa.fl_str_mv N/A
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Technology Management and Innovation
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv Arenas, J., & González, D. (2018). Technology Transfer Models and Elements in the University-Industry Collaboration. Administrative Sciences, 8(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020019
Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Guerrero, A. D. (2016). Examining technolo-gy transfer activities at universities : Does one recipe explain all outco-mes ? 137–144.
J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2020. Volume 15, Issue 2ISSN: 0718-2724. (http://jotmi.org)Journal of Technology Management & Innovation © Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Facultad de Economía y Negocios.91Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Guerrero, A. D. (2016). Examining technolo-gy transfer activities at universities : Does one recipe explain all outco-mes ? 137–144.
Bierly, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171111
Bolisani, E., & Bratianu, C. (2017). Knowledge strategy planning: an integrated approach to manage uncertainty, turbulence, and dyna-mics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2016-0071
Bradley, S. R., Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2013). Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer. Foundations and Trends® in Entre-preneurship, 9(6), 571–650. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000048
Brătianu, C. (2015). Developing Strategic Thinking in Business Edu-cation. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 3(3), 409–429. www.managementdynamics.ro
Budyldina, N. (2018). Entrepreneurial universities and regional con-tribution. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0500-0
Carree, M., Piergiovanni, R., Santarelli, E., & Verheul, I. (2015). Factors favoring innovation from a regional perspective: A comparison of pa-tents and trademarks. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0313-8
Chang, Y.-C., Chen, M.-H., Hua, M., & Yang, P. Y. (2006). Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: Towards a ‘scientific–economic’ fra-mework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2004.10.004
Chang, Y.-C., & Yang, P. Y. (2008). The impacts of academic patenting and licensing on knowledge production and diffChang, Y.-C., &
Yang, P. Y. (2008). The impacts of academic patenting and licensing on knowledge production and diffusion: a test of the anti-commons effect in Taiwan. R&D Man. R&D Management, 38(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00513.x-i1
Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M.-H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organi-zational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38(6), 936–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2009.03.005
Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., Martin, B. R., Chi, H.-R., & Tsai-Lin, T.-F. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity: A multilevel analysis. Technovation, 54, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2016.02.006
Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offi-ces: parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2005.01.007
Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. (2017). The Global Innova-tion Index 2017 Innovation Feeding the World. In The Global Innova-tion Index 2017: Innovation Feeding the World.
Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities ge-nerate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Santos, F. M. (2012). Knowledge-Based View: A New Theory of Strategy? In Handbook of Strategy and Management (pp. 139–164). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608313.n7
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Informa-tion, 42(3), 293–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of universi-ty–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Franco, M., & Haase, H. (2015). University-industry cooperation: Researchers’ motivations and interaction channels. Journal of Engi-neering and Technology Management - JET-M, 36, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.05.002
Fuquen, H. S., & Olaya-Escobar, E. S. (2018). A technology transfer strategy based on the dynamics of the generation of intellectual pro-perty in Latin-America. Intangible Capital, 14(2), 203–252. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.873
Hamdoun, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Ben Othman, H. (2018). Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Im-pacts of quality and environmental management. Journal of Clea-ner Production, 193, 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLE-PRO.2018.05.031
Han, J. (2017). Technology commercialization through sustainable knowledge sharing from university-industry collaborations, with a focus on patent propensity. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101808
HAN, J., & KIM, J. (2016). EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF TECHNO-LOGY TRANSFER IN KOREAN UNIVERSITIES. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(08), 1640018. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919616400181
Hogan, T. (2011). an Overview of the Knowledge Economy , With a Focus on. August, 1–35.
Johnson, W. H. A. (2008). Roles, resources and benefits of interme-diate organizations supporting triple helix collaborative R&D: The case of Precarn. Technovation, 28(8), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2008.02.007
Kashyap, A., & Agrawal, R. (2019). Scale development and modeling of intellectual property creation capability in higher education. Jour-nal of Intellectual Capital, 21(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2018-0168
Kasten, J. (2007). Knowledge strategy and its influence on knowledge organization (Vol. 1). http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1907
Landry, R., Amara, N., Cloutier, J. S., & Halilem, N. (2013). Technolo-gy transfer organizations: Services and business models. Technovation, 33(12), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.008
Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities: Toward a Renewed Categorization of University Activities? Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300169
Linton, J. D. (2018). DNA of the Triple Helix: Introduction to the special issue. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVA-TION.2018.07.002
Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2005.05.006
Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Wild, A. (2015). The Institutionalization of Third Stream Activities in UK Higher Education: The Role of Dis-course and Metrics. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12069
Longest, K. C., & Vaisey, S. (2008). fuzzy: A program for performing qualitative comparative analyses (QCA) in Stata. Stata Journal, 8(1), 79–104. https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v8y2008i1p79-104.html
Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Jour-nal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2003.12.003
Mintzberg, H. (1993). The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning. Har-vard Business Review
O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entre-preneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performan-ce of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011
Olaya-Escobar, E. S., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Alegre, I. (2020). Te-chnological Forecasting & Social Change Exploring the relationship between service quality of technology transfer offices and researchers ’ patenting activity. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 157(No-vember 2018), 120097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120097
OMPI. (2019). World Intellectual Property Indicators 2019.
Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entre-preneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31(4), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNO-VATION.2010.12.003
Pinheiro, R., Langa, P. V., & Pausits, A. (2015). The institutionaliza-tion of universities’ third mission: introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2015.1044551
Ragin, C. (2006). Guía del usuario de Fuzzy-Set / Qualitative Com-parative Analysis 2.0. Tucson, Arizona: Departamento de Sociología, Universidad de Arizona
Ragin, C., Drass, K. A., & Sean, D. (2006). Fuzzy-Set / Qualitative Comparative Analysis 2.0 . Tucson, Arizona: Departamento de Socio-logía, Universidad de Arizona.
Ragin, C., & Fiss, P. C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configu-rational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In Redesigning Social Inquiry: Set Relations in Social Research. In press. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Schmid, J., & Fajebe, A. (2019). Variation in patent impact by orga-nization type: An investigation of government, university, and cor-porate patents. Science and Public Policy, 46(4), 589–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz010
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of Good Practi-ce in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets. Com-parative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
Shattock, M., Unesco., & International Institute for Educational Plan-ning. (2009). Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy : diversification and organizational change in European hig-her education. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university te-chnology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
The World Bank. (2018). How does the World Bank classify countries? – World Bank Data Help Desk. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/378834-how-does-the-world-bank-classify-countries
Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, Cha-racteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1/2), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007884111883
Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-8
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
Toscano, F. L. P., Mainardes, E. W., & Lasso, S. V. (2017). Exploring Challenges in University Technology Transfer in Brazil. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(04), 1750021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500213
Von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., & Aben, M. (2001). Making the most of your company’s knowledge: A strategic framework. Long Range Plan-ning, 34(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00059-0
Woodside, A. G. (2012). Proposing a new logic for data analysis in marketing and consumer behavior: case study research of large-N sur-vey data for estimating algorithms that accurately profile X (extremely high-use) consumers. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 22(4), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2012.717369
Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37(8), 1205–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2008.04.021
Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. In CALIFOR-NIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 41, Issue 3)
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv CEPAL. (2016). Ciencia, tecnología e innovación en la economía di-gital. La situación de América Latina y el Caribe. Segunda Reunión de La Conferencia de Ciencia, Innovación y TIC de La CEPAL, 96. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
CRES. (2018a). El Papel Estratégico De La Educación Superior En El Desarrollo Sostenible De América Latina Y El Caribe. http://www.cres2018.org/uploads/educacion-superior-desarrollo-sostenible.pdfCRES. (2018b). Tendencias de la educación superior en América La-tina y el Caribe 2018. http://www.cres2018.org/uploads/educacion-superior-tendencias-ecuador.pdf
Fernández Guerrero, R., Revuelto Taboada, L., & Simón Moya, V. (2018). Supervivencia de empresas sociales de nueva creación. Un en-foque basado en el análisis cualitativo comparativo fsQCA. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.92.10735
Figueroa-Galvis, N. Y., Olaya-Escobar, E.S., & Castro Silva, H. (2019a). Identificación y comparación de factores que inciden en la transferencia de tecnología - XVIII Congreso Latino Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica ALTEC 2019 Medellín. Debates Sobre Innova-ción. http://economiaeinnovacionuamx.org/secciones/debatessobre-%0Ainnovacion
Figueroa-Galvis, N. Y., Olaya-Escobar, E. S., & Castro Silva, H. (2019b). Diseño de un modelo para la selección de estrategias de trans-ferencia a la medida de las características contextuales de las Institucio-nes de Educación Superior: caso Colombia. Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia.
Gandini, L. (2014). El análisis comparativo cualitativo como estrategia metodológica. June.
Olaya-Escobar, E. S., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Duarte, O. G. (2014). Desempeño de las oficinas de transferencia universitarias como in-termediarias para la potencialización del mercado de conocimien-to. Intangible Capital, 10(1), 155–188. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.497
Reuters. (2018). Reuters Top 100: las universidades más innovado-ras del mundo - 2018 - Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amers-reuters-ranking-innovative-univ/reuters-top-100-the-worlds-most-innovative-universities-2018-idUSKCN1ML0AZ#unis
WIPO. (2020). Patentes académicas: cómo las universidades y las or-ganizaciones públicas de investigación están utilizando su propiedad intelectual para impulsar la investigación y estimular nuevas empresas innovadoras. https://www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/academic_patenting.html
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 81 pàginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Revista del Grupo de Innovación y Gestión Tecnológica
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Chile
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.jotmi.org/index.php/GT/article/view/3369
institution Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/bitstream/001/1407/1/license.txt
https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/bitstream/001/1407/2/Modelo%20de%20Identificaci%c3%b3n%20de%20Estrategias%20para%20Potencializar%20la%20Generaci%c3%b3n%20de%20%20Patentes%20a%20la%20Medida%20de%20la%20Instituci%c3%b3n%20de%20Educaci%c3%b3n%20Superio.pdf
https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/bitstream/001/1407/3/Modelo%20de%20Identificaci%c3%b3n%20de%20Estrategias%20para%20Potencializar%20la%20Generaci%c3%b3n%20de%20%20Patentes%20a%20la%20Medida%20de%20la%20Instituci%c3%b3n%20de%20Educaci%c3%b3n%20Superio.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/bitstream/001/1407/4/Modelo%20de%20Identificaci%c3%b3n%20de%20Estrategias%20para%20Potencializar%20la%20Generaci%c3%b3n%20de%20%20Patentes%20a%20la%20Medida%20de%20la%20Instituci%c3%b3n%20de%20Educaci%c3%b3n%20Superio.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 5a7ca94c2e5326ee169f979d71d0f06e
8dbcf746a5a74565a9398f7c3eda8dd9
ba37c6e81b326903ec344ba515c85757
287a06364858fad458331f1694a18555
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.eci@escuelaing.edu.co
_version_ 1814355637576925184
spelling Figueroa Galvis, Neira Yolima5c380d4880e8fd9966146ee31183e842600Olaya Escobar, Erika Sofía10d03d1d4fd5a17ef1b77b54c606c9ba600Castro Silva, Hugo Fernando97f2799f66a6635d85d55f21492469f1600Desarrollo y Gerencia Integral de Proyectos2021-05-06T23:29:02Z2021-10-01T17:40:09Z2021-05-062021-10-01T17:40:09Z20200718-2724https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/140710.4067/S0718-27242020000200081https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242020000200081La transferencia de conocimiento y tecnología de las universidades contribuye al desarrollo regional y favorece la innovación. El objetivo de este trabajo es proponer un modelo para la selección de estrategias de transferencia adaptadas a las características contextuales de las Instituciones de Educación Superior de Colombia. Para ello, se realizó un Análisis Cualitativo Comparativo (QCA), mediante el cual se identifica la combinación de condiciones de fondo que generan una salida. La medida de desempeño fue el número de patentes de invención otorgadas y la aplicación empírica consideró 184 Instituciones de Educación Superior de Colombia.The transfer of knowledge and technology from universities contributes to regional development and favors innovation. The objective of this paper is to propose a model for the selection of transfer strategies adapted to the contextual characteristics of Higher Education Institutions of Colombia. For this purpose, a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) was performed, by which the combination of background conditions that generate an output is identified. The performance measure was the number of invention patents granted and the empirical application considered 184 Higher Education Institutions of Colombia. The results of the study identified ten strategic configurations that suggest different alternatives to potentiate protection through transfer mechanisms and highlights “productivity” and “innovation by territorial unit” as the best predictor of patents.1) Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Colombia. (2) Unidad de proyectos, Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito, (Bogotá D.C), Colombia. (3) Escuela de ingeniería industrial, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Colombia.81 pàginasapplication/pdfspaRevista del Grupo de Innovación y Gestión TecnológicaChilehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://www.jotmi.org/index.php/GT/article/view/3369Modelo de identificación de estrategias para potencializar la generación de patentes a la medida de la Institución de Educación Superior.Artículo de revistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARThttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Vol. 15 No. 2 (2020)9428115N/AJournal of Technology Management and InnovationArenas, J., & González, D. (2018). Technology Transfer Models and Elements in the University-Industry Collaboration. Administrative Sciences, 8(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020019Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Guerrero, A. D. (2016). Examining technolo-gy transfer activities at universities : Does one recipe explain all outco-mes ? 137–144.J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2020. Volume 15, Issue 2ISSN: 0718-2724. (http://jotmi.org)Journal of Technology Management & Innovation © Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Facultad de Economía y Negocios.91Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Guerrero, A. D. (2016). Examining technolo-gy transfer activities at universities : Does one recipe explain all outco-mes ? 137–144.Bierly, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171111Bolisani, E., & Bratianu, C. (2017). Knowledge strategy planning: an integrated approach to manage uncertainty, turbulence, and dyna-mics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2016-0071Bradley, S. R., Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2013). Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer. Foundations and Trends® in Entre-preneurship, 9(6), 571–650. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000048Brătianu, C. (2015). Developing Strategic Thinking in Business Edu-cation. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 3(3), 409–429. www.managementdynamics.roBudyldina, N. (2018). Entrepreneurial universities and regional con-tribution. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0500-0Carree, M., Piergiovanni, R., Santarelli, E., & Verheul, I. (2015). Factors favoring innovation from a regional perspective: A comparison of pa-tents and trademarks. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0313-8Chang, Y.-C., Chen, M.-H., Hua, M., & Yang, P. Y. (2006). Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: Towards a ‘scientific–economic’ fra-mework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2004.10.004Chang, Y.-C., & Yang, P. Y. (2008). The impacts of academic patenting and licensing on knowledge production and diffChang, Y.-C., &Yang, P. Y. (2008). The impacts of academic patenting and licensing on knowledge production and diffusion: a test of the anti-commons effect in Taiwan. R&D Man. R&D Management, 38(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00513.x-i1Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M.-H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organi-zational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38(6), 936–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2009.03.005Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., Martin, B. R., Chi, H.-R., & Tsai-Lin, T.-F. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity: A multilevel analysis. Technovation, 54, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2016.02.006Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offi-ces: parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2005.01.007Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. (2017). The Global Innova-tion Index 2017 Innovation Feeding the World. In The Global Innova-tion Index 2017: Innovation Feeding the World.Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities ge-nerate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5Eisenhardt, K. M., & Santos, F. M. (2012). Knowledge-Based View: A New Theory of Strategy? In Handbook of Strategy and Management (pp. 139–164). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608313.n7Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Informa-tion, 42(3), 293–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of universi-ty–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120Franco, M., & Haase, H. (2015). University-industry cooperation: Researchers’ motivations and interaction channels. Journal of Engi-neering and Technology Management - JET-M, 36, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.05.002Fuquen, H. S., & Olaya-Escobar, E. S. (2018). A technology transfer strategy based on the dynamics of the generation of intellectual pro-perty in Latin-America. Intangible Capital, 14(2), 203–252. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.873Hamdoun, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Ben Othman, H. (2018). Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Im-pacts of quality and environmental management. Journal of Clea-ner Production, 193, 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLE-PRO.2018.05.031Han, J. (2017). Technology commercialization through sustainable knowledge sharing from university-industry collaborations, with a focus on patent propensity. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101808HAN, J., & KIM, J. (2016). EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF TECHNO-LOGY TRANSFER IN KOREAN UNIVERSITIES. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(08), 1640018. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919616400181Hogan, T. (2011). an Overview of the Knowledge Economy , With a Focus on. August, 1–35.Johnson, W. H. A. (2008). Roles, resources and benefits of interme-diate organizations supporting triple helix collaborative R&D: The case of Precarn. Technovation, 28(8), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2008.02.007Kashyap, A., & Agrawal, R. (2019). Scale development and modeling of intellectual property creation capability in higher education. Jour-nal of Intellectual Capital, 21(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2018-0168Kasten, J. (2007). Knowledge strategy and its influence on knowledge organization (Vol. 1). http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1907Landry, R., Amara, N., Cloutier, J. S., & Halilem, N. (2013). Technolo-gy transfer organizations: Services and business models. Technovation, 33(12), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.008Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities: Toward a Renewed Categorization of University Activities? Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300169Linton, J. D. (2018). DNA of the Triple Helix: Introduction to the special issue. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVA-TION.2018.07.002Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2005.05.006Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Wild, A. (2015). The Institutionalization of Third Stream Activities in UK Higher Education: The Role of Dis-course and Metrics. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12069Longest, K. C., & Vaisey, S. (2008). fuzzy: A program for performing qualitative comparative analyses (QCA) in Stata. Stata Journal, 8(1), 79–104. https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v8y2008i1p79-104.htmlMarkman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Jour-nal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2003.12.003Mintzberg, H. (1993). The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning. Har-vard Business ReviewO’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entre-preneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performan-ce of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011Olaya-Escobar, E. S., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Alegre, I. (2020). Te-chnological Forecasting & Social Change Exploring the relationship between service quality of technology transfer offices and researchers ’ patenting activity. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 157(No-vember 2018), 120097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120097OMPI. (2019). World Intellectual Property Indicators 2019.Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entre-preneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31(4), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNO-VATION.2010.12.003Pinheiro, R., Langa, P. V., & Pausits, A. (2015). The institutionaliza-tion of universities’ third mission: introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2015.1044551Ragin, C. (2006). Guía del usuario de Fuzzy-Set / Qualitative Com-parative Analysis 2.0. Tucson, Arizona: Departamento de Sociología, Universidad de ArizonaRagin, C., Drass, K. A., & Sean, D. (2006). Fuzzy-Set / Qualitative Comparative Analysis 2.0 . Tucson, Arizona: Departamento de Socio-logía, Universidad de Arizona.Ragin, C., & Fiss, P. C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configu-rational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In Redesigning Social Inquiry: Set Relations in Social Research. In press. Chicago, University of Chicago PressSchmid, J., & Fajebe, A. (2019). Variation in patent impact by orga-nization type: An investigation of government, university, and cor-porate patents. Science and Public Policy, 46(4), 589–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz010Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of Good Practi-ce in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets. Com-parative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793Shattock, M., Unesco., & International Institute for Educational Plan-ning. (2009). Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy : diversification and organizational change in European hig-her education. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University PressSiegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university te-chnology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2The World Bank. (2018). How does the World Bank classify countries? – World Bank Data Help Desk. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/378834-how-does-the-world-bank-classify-countriesThursby, J. G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, Cha-racteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1/2), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007884111883Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-8Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271Toscano, F. L. P., Mainardes, E. W., & Lasso, S. V. (2017). Exploring Challenges in University Technology Transfer in Brazil. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(04), 1750021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500213Von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., & Aben, M. (2001). Making the most of your company’s knowledge: A strategic framework. Long Range Plan-ning, 34(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00059-0Woodside, A. G. (2012). Proposing a new logic for data analysis in marketing and consumer behavior: case study research of large-N sur-vey data for estimating algorithms that accurately profile X (extremely high-use) consumers. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 22(4), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2012.717369Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37(8), 1205–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2008.04.021Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. In CALIFOR-NIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW (Vol. 41, Issue 3)CEPAL. (2016). Ciencia, tecnología e innovación en la economía di-gital. La situación de América Latina y el Caribe. Segunda Reunión de La Conferencia de Ciencia, Innovación y TIC de La CEPAL, 96. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004CRES. (2018a). El Papel Estratégico De La Educación Superior En El Desarrollo Sostenible De América Latina Y El Caribe. http://www.cres2018.org/uploads/educacion-superior-desarrollo-sostenible.pdfCRES. (2018b). Tendencias de la educación superior en América La-tina y el Caribe 2018. http://www.cres2018.org/uploads/educacion-superior-tendencias-ecuador.pdfFernández Guerrero, R., Revuelto Taboada, L., & Simón Moya, V. (2018). Supervivencia de empresas sociales de nueva creación. Un en-foque basado en el análisis cualitativo comparativo fsQCA. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.92.10735Figueroa-Galvis, N. Y., Olaya-Escobar, E.S., & Castro Silva, H. (2019a). Identificación y comparación de factores que inciden en la transferencia de tecnología - XVIII Congreso Latino Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica ALTEC 2019 Medellín. Debates Sobre Innova-ción. http://economiaeinnovacionuamx.org/secciones/debatessobre-%0AinnovacionFigueroa-Galvis, N. Y., Olaya-Escobar, E. S., & Castro Silva, H. (2019b). Diseño de un modelo para la selección de estrategias de trans-ferencia a la medida de las características contextuales de las Institucio-nes de Educación Superior: caso Colombia. Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia.Gandini, L. (2014). El análisis comparativo cualitativo como estrategia metodológica. June.Olaya-Escobar, E. S., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Duarte, O. G. (2014). Desempeño de las oficinas de transferencia universitarias como in-termediarias para la potencialización del mercado de conocimien-to. Intangible Capital, 10(1), 155–188. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.497Reuters. (2018). Reuters Top 100: las universidades más innovado-ras del mundo - 2018 - Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amers-reuters-ranking-innovative-univ/reuters-top-100-the-worlds-most-innovative-universities-2018-idUSKCN1ML0AZ#unisWIPO. (2020). Patentes académicas: cómo las universidades y las or-ganizaciones públicas de investigación están utilizando su propiedad intelectual para impulsar la investigación y estimular nuevas empresas innovadoras. https://www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/academic_patenting.htmlTransferencia de tecnología- Innovaciones tecnológicasTecnología - Educación SuperiorPatentesTansferencia de conocimiento y tecnologíaInstituciones de Educación SuperiorAnálisis comparativo cualitativoPatentesKnowledge and technology transferHigher Education InstitutionsQualitative comparative analysisPatentsLICENSElicense.txttext/plain1881https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/bitstream/001/1407/1/license.txt5a7ca94c2e5326ee169f979d71d0f06eMD51open accessORIGINALModelo de Identificación de Estrategias para Potencializar la Generación de Patentes a la Medida de la Institución de Educación Superio.pdfapplication/pdf388640https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/bitstream/001/1407/2/Modelo%20de%20Identificaci%c3%b3n%20de%20Estrategias%20para%20Potencializar%20la%20Generaci%c3%b3n%20de%20%20Patentes%20a%20la%20Medida%20de%20la%20Instituci%c3%b3n%20de%20Educaci%c3%b3n%20Superio.pdf8dbcf746a5a74565a9398f7c3eda8dd9MD52open accessTEXTModelo de Identificación de Estrategias para Potencializar la Generación de Patentes a la Medida de la Institución de Educación Superio.pdf.txtModelo de Identificación de Estrategias para Potencializar la Generación de Patentes a la Medida de la Institución de Educación Superio.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain71750https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/bitstream/001/1407/3/Modelo%20de%20Identificaci%c3%b3n%20de%20Estrategias%20para%20Potencializar%20la%20Generaci%c3%b3n%20de%20%20Patentes%20a%20la%20Medida%20de%20la%20Instituci%c3%b3n%20de%20Educaci%c3%b3n%20Superio.pdf.txtba37c6e81b326903ec344ba515c85757MD53open accessTHUMBNAILModelo de Identificación de Estrategias para Potencializar la Generación de Patentes a la Medida de la Institución de Educación Superio.pdf.jpgModelo de Identificación de Estrategias para Potencializar la Generación de Patentes a la Medida de la Institución de Educación Superio.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg16674https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/bitstream/001/1407/4/Modelo%20de%20Identificaci%c3%b3n%20de%20Estrategias%20para%20Potencializar%20la%20Generaci%c3%b3n%20de%20%20Patentes%20a%20la%20Medida%20de%20la%20Instituci%c3%b3n%20de%20Educaci%c3%b3n%20Superio.pdf.jpg287a06364858fad458331f1694a18555MD54open access001/1407oai:repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co:001/14072021-10-01 17:51:28.587open accessRepositorio Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavitorepositorio.eci@escuelaing.edu.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

Publicaciones similares