System- and Software-level Architecting Harmonization Practices for Systems-of-Systems: An exploratory case study on a long-running large-scale scientific instrument
The problems caused by the gap between systemand software-level architecting practices, especially in the context of Systems of Systems where the two disciplines inexorably meet, is a well known issue with a disappointingly low amount of works in the literature dedicated to it. At the same time, org...
- Autores:
-
Cadavid, Héctor
Andrikopoulos, Vasilios
Avgeriou, Paris
Broekema, Chris
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2022
- Institución:
- Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional ECI
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co:001/3150
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/3150
https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Arquitectura de software - Casos de estudio
Software architecture - Case study
Ingeniería de sistemas de sistemas - Estudio de casos
Systems of Systems Engineering - Case Study
Software - Estudio de casos
Software - Case study
Systems of systems
Architecting
Case study
Scientific instruments
Empirical software engineering
Sistemas de sistemas
Arquitectura
Estudio de casos
Instrumentos científicos
Ingeniería de software empírica
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Summary: | The problems caused by the gap between systemand software-level architecting practices, especially in the context of Systems of Systems where the two disciplines inexorably meet, is a well known issue with a disappointingly low amount of works in the literature dedicated to it. At the same time, organizations working on Systems of Systems have been developing solutions for closing this gap for many years now. This work aims to extract such knowledge from practitioners by studying the case of a large-scale scientific instrument, a geographically distributed radio telescope to be more specific, developed as a sequence of projects during the last two decades. As the means for collecting data for this study we combine online interviews with a virtual focus group of practitioners from the organization responsible for building the instrument. Through this process, we identify persisting problems and the best practices that have been developed to deal with them, together with the perceived benefits and drawbacks of applying the latter in practice. Some of our major findings include the need to avoid over-reliance on the flexibility of software to compensate for incomplete requirements, hidden assumptions, as well as late involvement of system architecting, and to facilitate the cooperation between the involved disciplines through dedicated architecting roles and the adoption of unifying practices and standards. |
---|