A Survey on Socially Assistive Robotics: Clinicians’ and Patients’ Perception of a Social Robot within Gait Rehabilitation Therapies
A growing interest in Socially Assistive Robotics in Physical Rehabilitation is currently observed; some of the benefits highlight the capability of a social robot to support and assist rehabilitation procedures. This paper presents a perception study that aimed to evaluate clinicians’ and patients’...
- Autores:
-
Raigoso, Denniss
Céspedes, Nathalia
Cifuentes, Carlos A.
del Ama, Antonio J
Múnera, Marcela
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional ECI
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co:001/3245
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/handle/001/3245
https://repositorio.escuelaing.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- Rehabilitación médica
Medical rehabilitation
Tecnología médica
Medical technology
Robótica médica
Robotics in medicine
Terapia Lokomat
Lokomat therapy
Social robots
Physical rehabilitation
Perception
Gait rehabilitation
Lokomat
Robots sociales
Rehabilitación física
Percepción
Rehabilitación de la marcha
- Rights
- closedAccess
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
Summary: | A growing interest in Socially Assistive Robotics in Physical Rehabilitation is currently observed; some of the benefits highlight the capability of a social robot to support and assist rehabilitation procedures. This paper presents a perception study that aimed to evaluate clinicians’ and patients’ perception of a social robot that will be integrated as part of Lokomat therapy. A total of 88 participants were surveyed, employing an online questionnaire based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). The participants belong to two health care institutions located in different countries (Colombia and Spain). The results showed an overall positive perception of the social robot (>60% of participants have a positive acceptance). Furthermore, a difference depending on the nature of the user (clinician vs. patient) was found. |
---|