Vertical root fractures in endodontically-treated teeth: A retrospective analysis of possible risk factors
AIM: The prevalence of vertical root fractures (VRF) ranges from 2% to 20%, and is associated with endodontically-treated teeth (ETT). The aim of the present study was to analyze clinically and radiographically, at different intervals of time, some of the risk factors present in ETT that developed V...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22386
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12273
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22386
- Palabra clave:
- Adult
Case control study
Colombia
Complication
Diagnostic imaging
Endodontic procedure
Female
Human
Injuries
Male
Middle aged
Prevalence
Retrospective study
Risk factor
Statistical model
Tooth fracture
Tooth pulp disease
Tooth root
Adult
Case-control studies
Colombia
Female
Humans
Logistic models
Male
Middle aged
Prevalence
Retrospective studies
Risk factors
Root canal therapy
Tooth fractures
Tooth root
Tooth, nonvital
Case-control study
Endodontically-treated teeth
Incidence
Risk factor
Vertical root fracture
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
Summary: | AIM: The prevalence of vertical root fractures (VRF) ranges from 2% to 20%, and is associated with endodontically-treated teeth (ETT). The aim of the present study was to analyze clinically and radiographically, at different intervals of time, some of the risk factors present in ETT that developed VRF.METHODS: A classification model according to time measured the follow-up period of three groups. A match was made for times of occurrence (cases) and follow up (controls). An odds ratio (OR) test and a logistic regression model set at 95% confidence interval (CI) established the VRF probability when different clinical factors (patient, tooth, and endodontic or restorative treatment) were present.RESULTS: The sample was composed of 197 ETT (41 cases and 156 controls). A classification model set the trend, thus defining three groups: group 1 (1-4 years of follow up): endodontic retreatment (OR: 8.01, 95% CI: 1.85-37.90, P=.0014), indirect restoration (OR: .202, 95% CI: .036-.979, P=.05); group 2 (5-8 years of follow up): primary treatment (OR: .052, 95% CI: .002-.680, P=.044) and the 'single tooth' category (OR: .042, 95% CI: .002-.453, P=.02) demonstrated a significant association with VRF; and group 3 (>9 years of follow up): no association.CONCLUSION: Endodontic retreatment had the highest risk association for VRF after 1-8 years of follow up. Indirect and individual restorations were not significantly associated with VRF. © 2017 John Wiley and Sons Australia, Ltd. |
---|