Historicity, realism and truth
This paper argues that the historical character of our knowledge is compatible with both ontological and epistemological realism. The first part critically analyses the thesis according to which the situated nature of our cognitive practices implies that they do not refer to an extra-linguistic real...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22854
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2017v21n1p77
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22854
- Palabra clave:
- Anti-realism
Hermeneutical realism
Interpretation
Knowledge
Nietzsche
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
| Summary: | This paper argues that the historical character of our knowledge is compatible with both ontological and epistemological realism. The first part critically analyses the thesis according to which the situated nature of our cognitive practices implies that they do not refer to an extra-linguistic reality. The second section explores the claim that realism is a necessary presupposition of our communicative practices and the final part outlines the principles of a pluralist realism. |
|---|