Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis
An ethos of violence based on political ideologies aiming to delegitimize an adversary is a psychosocial barrier to solving lasting conflicts, such as in Colombia. Beyond the signing of a peace agreement, the cessation of political violence implies modifying the complex symbolic dynamics constructed...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23342
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2019.1615256
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23342
- Palabra clave:
- Rhetoric
Political
Ideology
Peace
Process
Colombia
Twitter
Analysis
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_f16f1785af5ae1016dcc2427b77c5654 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23342 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
2141a652-0aa0-40e8-ae12-00784793cfcf-151087601-ffa1-41a8-815f-78503eec4858-1fa66ec5d-908e-48de-a9bf-52b83dc0cf5e-17a0e6348-360f-49b1-b583-cb10b1426027-10ed47cd5-948c-419a-bb8c-b8caefb37957-171f27325-7684-4f41-bcad-1f3a7c34e31b-12020-05-26T00:01:16Z2020-05-26T00:01:16Z2019An ethos of violence based on political ideologies aiming to delegitimize an adversary is a psychosocial barrier to solving lasting conflicts, such as in Colombia. Beyond the signing of a peace agreement, the cessation of political violence implies modifying the complex symbolic dynamics constructed by various opposing actors to legitimize acts of direct violence. This research evaluates whether a new rhetoric that encourages the development of a peace culture has replaced the ideological rhetoric of various social actors involved in dialog and negotiations to end the armed conflict between the Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia–People’s Army (FARC-EP). To this end, a textual analysis of the ideological rhetoric disseminated through Twitter® by several actors in Colombian society was conducted to identify the expressions used (semantic analysis) to legitimize or delegitimize those involved in the conflict in the last negotiation year (2016). The outcome indicates that the agenda of topics revolves around peace, and although the ideological differences between the negotiation table (i.e., the government and FARC-EP) and the opposition party are evident in the published messages, all the actors are striving to develop a rhetoric of tolerance and coexistence. © 2019, © 2019 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2019.16152561057610Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23342engTaylor and Francis Inc.Studies in Conflict and TerrorismStudies in Conflict and Terrorism, ISSN:1057610X,(2019)https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066822319&doi=10.1080%2f1057610X.2019.1615256&partnerID=40&md5=56da19cdb3396516b96a6ea1d126a3d2Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURRhetoricPoliticalIdeologyPeaceProcessColombiaTwitterAnalysisRhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® AnalysisarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Barreto-Galeano, María IdalyMedina-Arboleda, Iván FelipeZambrano-Hernández, SoniaSabucedo-Cameselle, José-ManuelBlanco-Abarca, AmalioLair, Éric Maurice10336/23342oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/233422022-05-02 07:37:20.933295https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis |
title |
Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis |
spellingShingle |
Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis Rhetoric Political Ideology Peace Process Colombia Analysis |
title_short |
Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis |
title_full |
Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis |
title_sort |
Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Rhetoric Political Ideology Peace Process Colombia Analysis |
topic |
Rhetoric Political Ideology Peace Process Colombia Analysis |
description |
An ethos of violence based on political ideologies aiming to delegitimize an adversary is a psychosocial barrier to solving lasting conflicts, such as in Colombia. Beyond the signing of a peace agreement, the cessation of political violence implies modifying the complex symbolic dynamics constructed by various opposing actors to legitimize acts of direct violence. This research evaluates whether a new rhetoric that encourages the development of a peace culture has replaced the ideological rhetoric of various social actors involved in dialog and negotiations to end the armed conflict between the Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia–People’s Army (FARC-EP). To this end, a textual analysis of the ideological rhetoric disseminated through Twitter® by several actors in Colombian society was conducted to identify the expressions used (semantic analysis) to legitimize or delegitimize those involved in the conflict in the last negotiation year (2016). The outcome indicates that the agenda of topics revolves around peace, and although the ideological differences between the negotiation table (i.e., the government and FARC-EP) and the opposition party are evident in the published messages, all the actors are striving to develop a rhetoric of tolerance and coexistence. © 2019, © 2019 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:01:16Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:01:16Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2019.1615256 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1057610X |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23342 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2019.1615256 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23342 |
identifier_str_mv |
1057610X |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, ISSN:1057610X,(2019) |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066822319&doi=10.1080%2f1057610X.2019.1615256&partnerID=40&md5=56da19cdb3396516b96a6ea1d126a3d2 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Taylor and Francis Inc. |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167521817788416 |