Sensory allometry, foraging task specialization and resource exploitation in honeybees

Insect societies are important models for evolutionary biology and sociobiology. The complexity of some eusocial insect societies appears to arise from self-organized task allocation and group cohesion. One of the best-supported models explaining self-organized task allocation in social insects is t...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/26007
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0911-6
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26007
Palabra clave:
Response threshold model
Pollen syndrome
Social insects
Apis mellifera
Division of labor
Self-organization
Rights
License
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
id EDOCUR2_ed4bb3c2216596d199ebde7872ae0885
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/26007
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 799744496002c546390-89b1-4f15-bc38-5bff8fec22aa-12020-08-06T16:20:26Z2020-08-06T16:20:26Z2010-02-20Insect societies are important models for evolutionary biology and sociobiology. The complexity of some eusocial insect societies appears to arise from self-organized task allocation and group cohesion. One of the best-supported models explaining self-organized task allocation in social insects is the response threshold model, which predicts specialization due to inter-individual variability in sensitivity to task-associated stimuli. The model explains foraging task specialization among honeybee workers, but the factors underlying the differences in individual sensitivity remain elusive. Here, we propose that in honeybees, sensory sensitivity correlates with individual differences in the number of sensory structures, as it does in solitary species. Examining European and Africanized honeybees, we introduce and test the hypothesis that body size and/or sensory allometry is associated with foraging task preferences and resource exploitation. We focus on common morphological measures and on the size and number of structures associated with olfactory sensitivity. We show that the number of olfactory sensilla is greater in pollen and water foragers, which are known to exhibit higher sensory sensitivity, compared to nectar foragers. These differences are independent of the distribution of size within a colony. Our data also suggest that body mass and number of olfactory sensilla correlate with the concentration of nectar gathered by workers, and with the size of pollen loads they carry. We conclude that sensory allometry, but not necessarily body size, is associated with resource exploitation in honeybees and that the differences in number of sensilla may underlie the observed differences in sensitivity between bees specialized on water, pollen and nectar collection.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0911-6ISSN: 0340-5443EISSN: 1432-0762https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26007engSpringer Nature966955Behavioral Ecology and SociobiologyVol. 64Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, ISSN:0340-5443;EISSN:1432-0762, Vol.64 (May, 2010); pp.955-966https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00265-010-0911-6Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiologyinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURResponse threshold modelPollen syndromeSocial insectsApis melliferaDivision of laborSelf-organizationSensory allometry, foraging task specialization and resource exploitation in honeybeesAlometría sensorial, especialización de tareas de forrajeo y explotación de recursos en abejasarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Riveros Rivera, Andre JosafatGronenberg , Wulfila10336/26007oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/260072021-06-03 00:50:23.737https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Sensory allometry, foraging task specialization and resource exploitation in honeybees
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv Alometría sensorial, especialización de tareas de forrajeo y explotación de recursos en abejas
title Sensory allometry, foraging task specialization and resource exploitation in honeybees
spellingShingle Sensory allometry, foraging task specialization and resource exploitation in honeybees
Response threshold model
Pollen syndrome
Social insects
Apis mellifera
Division of labor
Self-organization
title_short Sensory allometry, foraging task specialization and resource exploitation in honeybees
title_full Sensory allometry, foraging task specialization and resource exploitation in honeybees
title_fullStr Sensory allometry, foraging task specialization and resource exploitation in honeybees
title_full_unstemmed Sensory allometry, foraging task specialization and resource exploitation in honeybees
title_sort Sensory allometry, foraging task specialization and resource exploitation in honeybees
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Response threshold model
Pollen syndrome
Social insects
Apis mellifera
Division of labor
Self-organization
topic Response threshold model
Pollen syndrome
Social insects
Apis mellifera
Division of labor
Self-organization
description Insect societies are important models for evolutionary biology and sociobiology. The complexity of some eusocial insect societies appears to arise from self-organized task allocation and group cohesion. One of the best-supported models explaining self-organized task allocation in social insects is the response threshold model, which predicts specialization due to inter-individual variability in sensitivity to task-associated stimuli. The model explains foraging task specialization among honeybee workers, but the factors underlying the differences in individual sensitivity remain elusive. Here, we propose that in honeybees, sensory sensitivity correlates with individual differences in the number of sensory structures, as it does in solitary species. Examining European and Africanized honeybees, we introduce and test the hypothesis that body size and/or sensory allometry is associated with foraging task preferences and resource exploitation. We focus on common morphological measures and on the size and number of structures associated with olfactory sensitivity. We show that the number of olfactory sensilla is greater in pollen and water foragers, which are known to exhibit higher sensory sensitivity, compared to nectar foragers. These differences are independent of the distribution of size within a colony. Our data also suggest that body mass and number of olfactory sensilla correlate with the concentration of nectar gathered by workers, and with the size of pollen loads they carry. We conclude that sensory allometry, but not necessarily body size, is associated with resource exploitation in honeybees and that the differences in number of sensilla may underlie the observed differences in sensitivity between bees specialized on water, pollen and nectar collection.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2010-02-20
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-06T16:20:26Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-06T16:20:26Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0911-6
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv ISSN: 0340-5443
EISSN: 1432-0762
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26007
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0911-6
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26007
identifier_str_mv ISSN: 0340-5443
EISSN: 1432-0762
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 966
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 955
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 64
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, ISSN:0340-5443;EISSN:1432-0762, Vol.64 (May, 2010); pp.955-966
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00265-010-0911-6
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
rights_invalid_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167704163057664