Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups

Monetary valuation using urban tree appraisals can be performed with formulas, a common practice in many countries. This study compares twelve parametric type formulas: Amenity Valuation of Tree and Woodlands (Helliwell), Standard Tree Evaluation Method (STEM), French Method, Italian Method, Tedesco...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22722
Acceso en línea:
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22722
Palabra clave:
Forest inventory
Parameterization
Tree
Urban forestry
Valuation
Bio bio
Chile
Concepcion [bio bio]
Maule
Metropolitana
Santiago [metropolitana]
Talca
Arboriculture
Parametric formulas
Tree assessment
Tree valuation
Urban forest benefits
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_e9683d31f2e30e9c29bdbabd860a023d
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22722
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 5b04b75d-3909-4961-9f25-86e346a89357-16e7f98c4-6442-4583-aa5a-e31bf71c58be-1368d04f3-0ee7-4522-b98a-584e22667c6f-12020-05-25T23:57:41Z2020-05-25T23:57:41Z2017Monetary valuation using urban tree appraisals can be performed with formulas, a common practice in many countries. This study compares twelve parametric type formulas: Amenity Valuation of Tree and Woodlands (Helliwell), Standard Tree Evaluation Method (STEM), French Method, Italian Method, Tedesco, Norma Granada, Trunk Replacement Formula (CTLA), Burnley Method, Danish Method, Swiss Method, and two Chilean formulas used in Municipalities of Concepción, La Pintana, and Maipú (COPIMA Method), and Peñalolén Method. Formulas were then applied to 30 trees located in Santiago, Talca and Concepción, Chile. Researchers used eight appraisers divided into two groups, according to senior-level and junior-level experience. Statistical differences were determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test of non-parametric variance, while Fisher's least significant difference test was used to identify homogeneous groups. The results show a wide dispersion of values that were high for 'emblematic' trees and low for young or low-vigor trees. Formula, type of appraisers, and inter-appraiser differences formed nine, two, and three groups, respectively. The lowest-appraised trees were obtained using the Danish and French Method, while the highest values were obtained with the Burnley, Helliwell, and STEM formulas. Although there were differences in tree value according to the type of appraiser, when comparing difference among appraisers, researchers found these were not due to experience level. Given the wide range of values found, the study authors cannot recommend any specific formula(s) for assessing urban trees, as results will depend on the variables of interest used in the formulas and their intended application and use. © 2017 International Society of Arboriculture.application/pdf19355297https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22722engInternational Society of Arboriculture82No. 272Arboriculture and Urban ForestryVol. 43Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, ISSN:19355297, Vol.43, No.2 (2017); pp. 72-82https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85016200744&partnerID=40&md5=557db98db1c950d6bee29a13f93819acAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURForest inventoryParameterizationTreeUrban forestryValuationBio bioChileConcepcion [bio bio]MauleMetropolitanaSantiago [metropolitana]TalcaArboricultureParametric formulasTree assessmentTree valuationUrban forest benefitsAppraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groupsarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Ponce-Donoso M.Vallejos-Barra Ó.Escobedo F.J.10336/22722oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/227222022-05-02 07:37:14.341979https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups
title Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups
spellingShingle Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups
Forest inventory
Parameterization
Tree
Urban forestry
Valuation
Bio bio
Chile
Concepcion [bio bio]
Maule
Metropolitana
Santiago [metropolitana]
Talca
Arboriculture
Parametric formulas
Tree assessment
Tree valuation
Urban forest benefits
title_short Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups
title_full Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups
title_fullStr Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups
title_full_unstemmed Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups
title_sort Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Forest inventory
Parameterization
Tree
Urban forestry
Valuation
Bio bio
Chile
Concepcion [bio bio]
Maule
Metropolitana
Santiago [metropolitana]
Talca
Arboriculture
Parametric formulas
Tree assessment
Tree valuation
Urban forest benefits
topic Forest inventory
Parameterization
Tree
Urban forestry
Valuation
Bio bio
Chile
Concepcion [bio bio]
Maule
Metropolitana
Santiago [metropolitana]
Talca
Arboriculture
Parametric formulas
Tree assessment
Tree valuation
Urban forest benefits
description Monetary valuation using urban tree appraisals can be performed with formulas, a common practice in many countries. This study compares twelve parametric type formulas: Amenity Valuation of Tree and Woodlands (Helliwell), Standard Tree Evaluation Method (STEM), French Method, Italian Method, Tedesco, Norma Granada, Trunk Replacement Formula (CTLA), Burnley Method, Danish Method, Swiss Method, and two Chilean formulas used in Municipalities of Concepción, La Pintana, and Maipú (COPIMA Method), and Peñalolén Method. Formulas were then applied to 30 trees located in Santiago, Talca and Concepción, Chile. Researchers used eight appraisers divided into two groups, according to senior-level and junior-level experience. Statistical differences were determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test of non-parametric variance, while Fisher's least significant difference test was used to identify homogeneous groups. The results show a wide dispersion of values that were high for 'emblematic' trees and low for young or low-vigor trees. Formula, type of appraisers, and inter-appraiser differences formed nine, two, and three groups, respectively. The lowest-appraised trees were obtained using the Danish and French Method, while the highest values were obtained with the Burnley, Helliwell, and STEM formulas. Although there were differences in tree value according to the type of appraiser, when comparing difference among appraisers, researchers found these were not due to experience level. Given the wide range of values found, the study authors cannot recommend any specific formula(s) for assessing urban trees, as results will depend on the variables of interest used in the formulas and their intended application and use. © 2017 International Society of Arboriculture.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:57:41Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:57:41Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 19355297
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22722
identifier_str_mv 19355297
url https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22722
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 82
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 2
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 72
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Arboriculture and Urban Forestry
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 43
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, ISSN:19355297, Vol.43, No.2 (2017); pp. 72-82
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85016200744&partnerID=40&md5=557db98db1c950d6bee29a13f93819ac
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv International Society of Arboriculture
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808391019703566336