Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups
Monetary valuation using urban tree appraisals can be performed with formulas, a common practice in many countries. This study compares twelve parametric type formulas: Amenity Valuation of Tree and Woodlands (Helliwell), Standard Tree Evaluation Method (STEM), French Method, Italian Method, Tedesco...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22722
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22722
- Palabra clave:
- Forest inventory
Parameterization
Tree
Urban forestry
Valuation
Bio bio
Chile
Concepcion [bio bio]
Maule
Metropolitana
Santiago [metropolitana]
Talca
Arboriculture
Parametric formulas
Tree assessment
Tree valuation
Urban forest benefits
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_e9683d31f2e30e9c29bdbabd860a023d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22722 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
5b04b75d-3909-4961-9f25-86e346a89357-16e7f98c4-6442-4583-aa5a-e31bf71c58be-1368d04f3-0ee7-4522-b98a-584e22667c6f-12020-05-25T23:57:41Z2020-05-25T23:57:41Z2017Monetary valuation using urban tree appraisals can be performed with formulas, a common practice in many countries. This study compares twelve parametric type formulas: Amenity Valuation of Tree and Woodlands (Helliwell), Standard Tree Evaluation Method (STEM), French Method, Italian Method, Tedesco, Norma Granada, Trunk Replacement Formula (CTLA), Burnley Method, Danish Method, Swiss Method, and two Chilean formulas used in Municipalities of Concepción, La Pintana, and Maipú (COPIMA Method), and Peñalolén Method. Formulas were then applied to 30 trees located in Santiago, Talca and Concepción, Chile. Researchers used eight appraisers divided into two groups, according to senior-level and junior-level experience. Statistical differences were determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test of non-parametric variance, while Fisher's least significant difference test was used to identify homogeneous groups. The results show a wide dispersion of values that were high for 'emblematic' trees and low for young or low-vigor trees. Formula, type of appraisers, and inter-appraiser differences formed nine, two, and three groups, respectively. The lowest-appraised trees were obtained using the Danish and French Method, while the highest values were obtained with the Burnley, Helliwell, and STEM formulas. Although there were differences in tree value according to the type of appraiser, when comparing difference among appraisers, researchers found these were not due to experience level. Given the wide range of values found, the study authors cannot recommend any specific formula(s) for assessing urban trees, as results will depend on the variables of interest used in the formulas and their intended application and use. © 2017 International Society of Arboriculture.application/pdf19355297https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22722engInternational Society of Arboriculture82No. 272Arboriculture and Urban ForestryVol. 43Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, ISSN:19355297, Vol.43, No.2 (2017); pp. 72-82https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85016200744&partnerID=40&md5=557db98db1c950d6bee29a13f93819acAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURForest inventoryParameterizationTreeUrban forestryValuationBio bioChileConcepcion [bio bio]MauleMetropolitanaSantiago [metropolitana]TalcaArboricultureParametric formulasTree assessmentTree valuationUrban forest benefitsAppraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groupsarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Ponce-Donoso M.Vallejos-Barra Ó.Escobedo F.J.10336/22722oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/227222022-05-02 07:37:14.341979https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups |
title |
Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups |
spellingShingle |
Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups Forest inventory Parameterization Tree Urban forestry Valuation Bio bio Chile Concepcion [bio bio] Maule Metropolitana Santiago [metropolitana] Talca Arboriculture Parametric formulas Tree assessment Tree valuation Urban forest benefits |
title_short |
Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups |
title_full |
Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups |
title_fullStr |
Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups |
title_full_unstemmed |
Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups |
title_sort |
Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Forest inventory Parameterization Tree Urban forestry Valuation Bio bio Chile Concepcion [bio bio] Maule Metropolitana Santiago [metropolitana] Talca Arboriculture Parametric formulas Tree assessment Tree valuation Urban forest benefits |
topic |
Forest inventory Parameterization Tree Urban forestry Valuation Bio bio Chile Concepcion [bio bio] Maule Metropolitana Santiago [metropolitana] Talca Arboriculture Parametric formulas Tree assessment Tree valuation Urban forest benefits |
description |
Monetary valuation using urban tree appraisals can be performed with formulas, a common practice in many countries. This study compares twelve parametric type formulas: Amenity Valuation of Tree and Woodlands (Helliwell), Standard Tree Evaluation Method (STEM), French Method, Italian Method, Tedesco, Norma Granada, Trunk Replacement Formula (CTLA), Burnley Method, Danish Method, Swiss Method, and two Chilean formulas used in Municipalities of Concepción, La Pintana, and Maipú (COPIMA Method), and Peñalolén Method. Formulas were then applied to 30 trees located in Santiago, Talca and Concepción, Chile. Researchers used eight appraisers divided into two groups, according to senior-level and junior-level experience. Statistical differences were determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test of non-parametric variance, while Fisher's least significant difference test was used to identify homogeneous groups. The results show a wide dispersion of values that were high for 'emblematic' trees and low for young or low-vigor trees. Formula, type of appraisers, and inter-appraiser differences formed nine, two, and three groups, respectively. The lowest-appraised trees were obtained using the Danish and French Method, while the highest values were obtained with the Burnley, Helliwell, and STEM formulas. Although there were differences in tree value according to the type of appraiser, when comparing difference among appraisers, researchers found these were not due to experience level. Given the wide range of values found, the study authors cannot recommend any specific formula(s) for assessing urban trees, as results will depend on the variables of interest used in the formulas and their intended application and use. © 2017 International Society of Arboriculture. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:57:41Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:57:41Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
19355297 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22722 |
identifier_str_mv |
19355297 |
url |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22722 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
82 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 2 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
72 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Arboriculture and Urban Forestry |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 43 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, ISSN:19355297, Vol.43, No.2 (2017); pp. 72-82 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85016200744&partnerID=40&md5=557db98db1c950d6bee29a13f93819ac |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
International Society of Arboriculture |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1818106957205078016 |