Comparison of two doses of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diffuse diabetic macular edema: Results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES) at 12-month follow-up
Background: To report the 12-month anatomic and ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) response after primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin®) (1.25 mg or 2.5 mg) in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME). In addition, a comparison of the two different doses of intravitreal bevaci...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2009
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24173
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-1034-x
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24173
- Palabra clave:
- Bevacizumab
Adult
Article
Cerebrovascular accident
Clinical trial
Comparative study
Controlled clinical trial
Controlled study
Cornea thickness
Diabetic macular edema
Dose response
Drug dose comparison
Drug efficacy
Drug safety
Drug stability
Female
Fluorescence angiography
Follow up
Heart infarction
Human
Hypertension
Intraocular pressure
Major clinical study
Male
Multicenter study
Off label drug use
Ophthalmoscopy
Optical coherence tomography
Peripheral vascular disease
Priority journal
Retina detachment
Side effect
Thromboembolism
Transient ischemic attack
Visual acuity
Angiogenesis inhibitors
Cooperative behavior
Diabetic retinopathy
Female
Fluorescein angiography
Follow-up studies
Humans
Injections
Macular edema
Male
Middle aged
Retina
Retreatment
Retrospective studies
Treatment outcome
Vascular endothelial growth factor a
Visual acuity
Vitreous body
Avastin
Bevacizumab
Diffuse diabetic macular edema
Intravitreal injections
Oct
Primary treatment
optical coherence
monoclonal
Antibodies
Tomography
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_e82d6e17fc331ffce6bc919958e0edd9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24173 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of two doses of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diffuse diabetic macular edema: Results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES) at 12-month follow-up |
title |
Comparison of two doses of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diffuse diabetic macular edema: Results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES) at 12-month follow-up |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of two doses of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diffuse diabetic macular edema: Results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES) at 12-month follow-up Bevacizumab Adult Article Cerebrovascular accident Clinical trial Comparative study Controlled clinical trial Controlled study Cornea thickness Diabetic macular edema Dose response Drug dose comparison Drug efficacy Drug safety Drug stability Female Fluorescence angiography Follow up Heart infarction Human Hypertension Intraocular pressure Major clinical study Male Multicenter study Off label drug use Ophthalmoscopy Optical coherence tomography Peripheral vascular disease Priority journal Retina detachment Side effect Thromboembolism Transient ischemic attack Visual acuity Angiogenesis inhibitors Cooperative behavior Diabetic retinopathy Female Fluorescein angiography Follow-up studies Humans Injections Macular edema Male Middle aged Retina Retreatment Retrospective studies Treatment outcome Vascular endothelial growth factor a Visual acuity Vitreous body Avastin Bevacizumab Diffuse diabetic macular edema Intravitreal injections Oct Primary treatment optical coherence monoclonal Antibodies Tomography |
title_short |
Comparison of two doses of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diffuse diabetic macular edema: Results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES) at 12-month follow-up |
title_full |
Comparison of two doses of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diffuse diabetic macular edema: Results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES) at 12-month follow-up |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of two doses of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diffuse diabetic macular edema: Results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES) at 12-month follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of two doses of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diffuse diabetic macular edema: Results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES) at 12-month follow-up |
title_sort |
Comparison of two doses of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diffuse diabetic macular edema: Results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES) at 12-month follow-up |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bevacizumab Adult Article Cerebrovascular accident Clinical trial Comparative study Controlled clinical trial Controlled study Cornea thickness Diabetic macular edema Dose response Drug dose comparison Drug efficacy Drug safety Drug stability Female Fluorescence angiography Follow up Heart infarction Human Hypertension Intraocular pressure Major clinical study Male Multicenter study Off label drug use Ophthalmoscopy Optical coherence tomography Peripheral vascular disease Priority journal Retina detachment Side effect Thromboembolism Transient ischemic attack Visual acuity Angiogenesis inhibitors Cooperative behavior Diabetic retinopathy Female Fluorescein angiography Follow-up studies Humans Injections Macular edema Male Middle aged Retina Retreatment Retrospective studies Treatment outcome Vascular endothelial growth factor a Visual acuity Vitreous body Avastin Bevacizumab Diffuse diabetic macular edema Intravitreal injections Oct Primary treatment |
topic |
Bevacizumab Adult Article Cerebrovascular accident Clinical trial Comparative study Controlled clinical trial Controlled study Cornea thickness Diabetic macular edema Dose response Drug dose comparison Drug efficacy Drug safety Drug stability Female Fluorescence angiography Follow up Heart infarction Human Hypertension Intraocular pressure Major clinical study Male Multicenter study Off label drug use Ophthalmoscopy Optical coherence tomography Peripheral vascular disease Priority journal Retina detachment Side effect Thromboembolism Transient ischemic attack Visual acuity Angiogenesis inhibitors Cooperative behavior Diabetic retinopathy Female Fluorescein angiography Follow-up studies Humans Injections Macular edema Male Middle aged Retina Retreatment Retrospective studies Treatment outcome Vascular endothelial growth factor a Visual acuity Vitreous body Avastin Bevacizumab Diffuse diabetic macular edema Intravitreal injections Oct Primary treatment optical coherence monoclonal Antibodies Tomography |
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv |
optical coherence monoclonal Antibodies Tomography |
description |
Background: To report the 12-month anatomic and ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) response after primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin®) (1.25 mg or 2.5 mg) in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME). In addition, a comparison of the two different doses of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) utilized was made. Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of 82 consecutive patients (101 eyes) with DDME in this interventional retrospective multicenter study. All patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean 57.6±8.4 weeks) were included in this analysis. Patients underwent ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, ophthalmoscopic examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography (FA) at baseline and follow-up visits. Results: The mean age of our patients was 59.7±9.3 years. The mean number of IVB injections per eye was three (range: one to six injections) at a mean interval of 14.1±10.5 weeks. In the 1.25 mg group at 1 month BCVA improved from 20/190, logMAR=0.97 to 20/85, logMAR 0.62, a difference that was statistically significant (p=0.0001). This improvement was maintained throughout the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. The mean final BCVA at 12 months was 20/76, logMAR=0.58 (p less than 0.001), a statistically significant difference from baseline BCVA. Similar BCVA changes were observed in the 2.5 mg group. In the 1.25 mg group, the mean central macular thickness (CMT) decreased from 419.1±201.1 ?m at baseline to 295.11±91.5 ?m at 1 month, 302.1±124.2 m at 5 months, 313.4.1±96.3 m at 6 months, and 268.2±95.5 m at 12 months (plt;0.0001). Similar CMT changes were observed in the 2.5 mg group. Adverse events included transient high blood pressure in one patient (1.2%), transient increased intraocular pressure in one eye (1%), and tractional retinal detachment in one eye (1%). Conclusions: Primary IVB at doses of 1.25 to 2.5 mg seem to provide stability or improvement in BCVA, OCT, and FA in DDME at 12 months. There seems to be no difference in our results between intravitreal bevacizumab at doses of 1.25 mg or 2.5 mg. In addition, our results suggest the need for at least three injections a year to maintain the BCVA results. © Springer-Verlag 2009. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2009 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:09:42Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:09:42Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-1034-x |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0721832X 1435702X |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24173 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-1034-x https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24173 |
identifier_str_mv |
0721832X 1435702X |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
743 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 6 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
735 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Graefe`s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 247 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, ISSN:0721832X, 1435702X, Vol.247, No.6 (2009); pp. 735-743 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-67349157689&doi=10.1007%2fs00417-008-1034-x&partnerID=40&md5=8c14da8e77ba55bd294706db037a8be6 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167479506698240 |
spelling |
739ecf4c-3887-4668-bcea-2114906b5010-1e69e8b13-e9f7-4381-a9a8-95e96943618f-13cecefca-0c1e-48fa-8212-cf7c5afd7db0-1e9382a84-7532-4238-a6e9-d0b1e9cc130f-1390567f2-51a9-42ab-b5cb-bca59742d357-19f316ae0-f559-4a6e-a149-2ad535804452-1e32420a9-acac-4ea3-a4da-c26edfffa7eb-146cf489a-6cbe-4d89-b5b9-26afc9eca194-168bf4a93-2e61-43e2-ae7f-ebc361f64234-1e982d410-c073-4210-be50-890548540cfa6002020-05-26T00:09:42Z2020-05-26T00:09:42Z2009Background: To report the 12-month anatomic and ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) response after primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin®) (1.25 mg or 2.5 mg) in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME). In addition, a comparison of the two different doses of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) utilized was made. Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of 82 consecutive patients (101 eyes) with DDME in this interventional retrospective multicenter study. All patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean 57.6±8.4 weeks) were included in this analysis. Patients underwent ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, ophthalmoscopic examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography (FA) at baseline and follow-up visits. Results: The mean age of our patients was 59.7±9.3 years. The mean number of IVB injections per eye was three (range: one to six injections) at a mean interval of 14.1±10.5 weeks. In the 1.25 mg group at 1 month BCVA improved from 20/190, logMAR=0.97 to 20/85, logMAR 0.62, a difference that was statistically significant (p=0.0001). This improvement was maintained throughout the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. The mean final BCVA at 12 months was 20/76, logMAR=0.58 (p less than 0.001), a statistically significant difference from baseline BCVA. Similar BCVA changes were observed in the 2.5 mg group. In the 1.25 mg group, the mean central macular thickness (CMT) decreased from 419.1±201.1 ?m at baseline to 295.11±91.5 ?m at 1 month, 302.1±124.2 m at 5 months, 313.4.1±96.3 m at 6 months, and 268.2±95.5 m at 12 months (plt;0.0001). Similar CMT changes were observed in the 2.5 mg group. Adverse events included transient high blood pressure in one patient (1.2%), transient increased intraocular pressure in one eye (1%), and tractional retinal detachment in one eye (1%). Conclusions: Primary IVB at doses of 1.25 to 2.5 mg seem to provide stability or improvement in BCVA, OCT, and FA in DDME at 12 months. There seems to be no difference in our results between intravitreal bevacizumab at doses of 1.25 mg or 2.5 mg. In addition, our results suggest the need for at least three injections a year to maintain the BCVA results. © Springer-Verlag 2009.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-1034-x0721832X1435702Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24173eng743No. 6735Graefe`s Archive for Clinical and Experimental OphthalmologyVol. 247Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, ISSN:0721832X, 1435702X, Vol.247, No.6 (2009); pp. 735-743https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-67349157689&doi=10.1007%2fs00417-008-1034-x&partnerID=40&md5=8c14da8e77ba55bd294706db037a8be6Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURBevacizumabAdultArticleCerebrovascular accidentClinical trialComparative studyControlled clinical trialControlled studyCornea thicknessDiabetic macular edemaDose responseDrug dose comparisonDrug efficacyDrug safetyDrug stabilityFemaleFluorescence angiographyFollow upHeart infarctionHumanHypertensionIntraocular pressureMajor clinical studyMaleMulticenter studyOff label drug useOphthalmoscopyOptical coherence tomographyPeripheral vascular diseasePriority journalRetina detachmentSide effectThromboembolismTransient ischemic attackVisual acuityAngiogenesis inhibitorsCooperative behaviorDiabetic retinopathyFemaleFluorescein angiographyFollow-up studiesHumansInjectionsMacular edemaMaleMiddle agedRetinaRetreatmentRetrospective studiesTreatment outcomeVascular endothelial growth factor aVisual acuityVitreous bodyAvastinBevacizumabDiffuse diabetic macular edemaIntravitreal injectionsOctPrimary treatmentoptical coherencemonoclonalAntibodiesTomographyComparison of two doses of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diffuse diabetic macular edema: Results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES) at 12-month follow-uparticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Arevalo, J. FernandoSanchez, Juan G.Fromow-Guerra, JansWu, LihtehBerrocal, Maria H.Farah, Michel E.Cardillo, JoseRodríguez, Francisco J.for the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES)Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES)10336/24173oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/241732022-05-02 07:37:21.556997https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |