Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control
The ability to override a dominant response, often referred to as behavioral inhibition, is considered a key element of executive cognition. Poor behavioral inhibition is a defining characteristic of several neurological and psychiatric populations. Recently, there has been increasing interest in th...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2014
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24087
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00257
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24087
- Palabra clave:
- Adult
Article
Behavioral science
Executive function
Female
Go nogo task
Human
Human experiment
Inhibition (psychology)
Male
Money
Neurofeedback
Neurologic examination
Neuromodulation
Normal human
Pilot study
Response time
Reward
Stimulus response
Stop signal task
Task performance
Behavioral analysis
Cognitive control
Inhibition (psychology)
Reward
Stop signal task
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_e811a01c8d8e2e09bd1fd3eca7c4b44b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24087 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control |
title |
Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control |
spellingShingle |
Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control Adult Article Behavioral science Executive function Female Go nogo task Human Human experiment Inhibition (psychology) Male Money Neurofeedback Neurologic examination Neuromodulation Normal human Pilot study Response time Reward Stimulus response Stop signal task Task performance Behavioral analysis Cognitive control Inhibition (psychology) Reward Stop signal task |
title_short |
Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control |
title_full |
Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control |
title_fullStr |
Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control |
title_full_unstemmed |
Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control |
title_sort |
Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Adult Article Behavioral science Executive function Female Go nogo task Human Human experiment Inhibition (psychology) Male Money Neurofeedback Neurologic examination Neuromodulation Normal human Pilot study Response time Reward Stimulus response Stop signal task Task performance Behavioral analysis Cognitive control Inhibition (psychology) Reward Stop signal task |
topic |
Adult Article Behavioral science Executive function Female Go nogo task Human Human experiment Inhibition (psychology) Male Money Neurofeedback Neurologic examination Neuromodulation Normal human Pilot study Response time Reward Stimulus response Stop signal task Task performance Behavioral analysis Cognitive control Inhibition (psychology) Reward Stop signal task |
description |
The ability to override a dominant response, often referred to as behavioral inhibition, is considered a key element of executive cognition. Poor behavioral inhibition is a defining characteristic of several neurological and psychiatric populations. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the motivational dimension of behavioral inhibition, with some experiments incorporating emotional contingencies in classical inhibitory paradigms such as the Go/NoGo and Stop Signal Tasks (SSTs). Several studies have reported a positive modulatory effect of reward on performance in pathological conditions such as substance abuse, pathological gambling, and Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD). However, experiments that directly investigate the modulatory effects of reward magnitudes on the performance of inhibitory tasks are scarce and little is known about the finer grained relationship between motivation and inhibitory control. Here we probed the effect of reward magnitude and context on behavioral inhibition with three modified versions of the widely used SST. The pilot study compared inhibition performance during six blocks alternating neutral feedback, low, medium, and high monetary rewards. Study One compared increasing vs. decreasing rewards, with low, high rewards, and neutral feedback; whilst Study Two compared low and high reward magnitudes alone also in an increasing and decreasing reward design. The reward magnitude effect was not demonstrated in the pilot study, probably due to a learning effect induced by practice in this lengthy task. The reward effect per se was weak but the context (order of reward) was clearly suggested in Study One, and was particularly strongly confirmed in study two. In addition, these findings revealed a 'kick start effect' over global performance measures. Specifically, there was a long lasting improvement in performance throughout the task when participants received the highest reward magnitudes at the beginning of the protocol. These results demonstrate a dynamical behavioral inhibition capacity in humans, as illustrated by the reward magnitude modulation and initial reward history effects. © 2014 Herrera, Speranza, Hampshire and Bekinschtein. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2014 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:08:28Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:08:28Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00257 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
16625161 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24087 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00257 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24087 |
identifier_str_mv |
16625161 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. MAY |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 8 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, ISSN:16625161, Vol.8, No.MAY (2014) |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84900545063&doi=10.3389%2ffnhum.2014.00257&partnerID=40&md5=ca5eb17eb4f1909a5ca9531ae5e6561a |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media S. A. |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/364e91c5-0abb-43dd-b7cd-58e1ba052cbc/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/45af500e-b69b-4494-b154-730da0b88c39/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7a349c02-a89b-424d-853c-655ca0729cd6/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
54bdb28392d77e8b71edf80c0ef0e99a f5d6e82783e139e772e541c338fffde0 fa4485096c22bb24462690a9b001ee6b |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167439642984448 |
spelling |
a4a7691b-7641-43c2-af59-8906dd212040-1577fcd45-8e6f-49d0-ac8e-409081de4b13-1cced6dd9-5cb1-4342-8306-57d69909102d-1c38da154-435c-4b92-9f3a-19bb981eb6c7-12020-05-26T00:08:28Z2020-05-26T00:08:28Z2014The ability to override a dominant response, often referred to as behavioral inhibition, is considered a key element of executive cognition. Poor behavioral inhibition is a defining characteristic of several neurological and psychiatric populations. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the motivational dimension of behavioral inhibition, with some experiments incorporating emotional contingencies in classical inhibitory paradigms such as the Go/NoGo and Stop Signal Tasks (SSTs). Several studies have reported a positive modulatory effect of reward on performance in pathological conditions such as substance abuse, pathological gambling, and Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD). However, experiments that directly investigate the modulatory effects of reward magnitudes on the performance of inhibitory tasks are scarce and little is known about the finer grained relationship between motivation and inhibitory control. Here we probed the effect of reward magnitude and context on behavioral inhibition with three modified versions of the widely used SST. The pilot study compared inhibition performance during six blocks alternating neutral feedback, low, medium, and high monetary rewards. Study One compared increasing vs. decreasing rewards, with low, high rewards, and neutral feedback; whilst Study Two compared low and high reward magnitudes alone also in an increasing and decreasing reward design. The reward magnitude effect was not demonstrated in the pilot study, probably due to a learning effect induced by practice in this lengthy task. The reward effect per se was weak but the context (order of reward) was clearly suggested in Study One, and was particularly strongly confirmed in study two. In addition, these findings revealed a 'kick start effect' over global performance measures. Specifically, there was a long lasting improvement in performance throughout the task when participants received the highest reward magnitudes at the beginning of the protocol. These results demonstrate a dynamical behavioral inhibition capacity in humans, as illustrated by the reward magnitude modulation and initial reward history effects. © 2014 Herrera, Speranza, Hampshire and Bekinschtein.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.0025716625161https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24087engFrontiers Media S. A.No. MAYFrontiers in Human NeuroscienceVol. 8Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, ISSN:16625161, Vol.8, No.MAY (2014)https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84900545063&doi=10.3389%2ffnhum.2014.00257&partnerID=40&md5=ca5eb17eb4f1909a5ca9531ae5e6561aAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAdultArticleBehavioral scienceExecutive functionFemaleGo nogo taskHumanHuman experimentInhibition (psychology)MaleMoneyNeurofeedbackNeurologic examinationNeuromodulationNormal humanPilot studyResponse timeRewardStimulus responseStop signal taskTask performanceBehavioral analysisCognitive controlInhibition (psychology)RewardStop signal taskMonetary rewards modulate inhibitory controlarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Herrera, Paula M.Speranza, MarioHampshire, AdamBekinschtein, Tristán A.ORIGINALfnhum-08-00257.pdfapplication/pdf1218322https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/364e91c5-0abb-43dd-b7cd-58e1ba052cbc/download54bdb28392d77e8b71edf80c0ef0e99aMD51TEXTfnhum-08-00257.pdf.txtfnhum-08-00257.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain87814https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/45af500e-b69b-4494-b154-730da0b88c39/downloadf5d6e82783e139e772e541c338fffde0MD52THUMBNAILfnhum-08-00257.pdf.jpgfnhum-08-00257.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4795https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7a349c02-a89b-424d-853c-655ca0729cd6/downloadfa4485096c22bb24462690a9b001ee6bMD5310336/24087oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/240872022-05-02 07:37:21.392948https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |