Observational Methods for Assessing Ergonomic Risks for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A Scoping Review

Introduction: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDS) are one of the most common causes of absence from work. Exposures in the work environment can cause or aggravate the impact of these musculoskeletal disorders and the identification of ergonomic exposures are essential in risk assessment....

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/29445
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.6840
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/29445
Palabra clave:
Evaluación
Ergonomía
Desórdenes músculo-esqueléticos
Métodos de observación
Riesgo
Avaliação
Métodos de observação
Desordens musculoesqueléticas
Risco
Ergonomia
Assessment
Ergonomics
Musculoskeletal disorders
Observational methods
Risk
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_e5981767870a4c12f0cde3147b4b4a17
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/29445
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Observational Methods for Assessing Ergonomic Risks for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A Scoping Review
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv Métodos observacionales para evaluar los riesgos ergonómicos de los Desórdenes Músculo esqueléticos relacionados con el trabajo: revisión del alcance
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.por.fl_str_mv Métodos observacionais para avaliar os riscos ergonômicos das Desordens Musculoesqueléticas relacionados com o trabalho: revisão do alcance
title Observational Methods for Assessing Ergonomic Risks for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A Scoping Review
spellingShingle Observational Methods for Assessing Ergonomic Risks for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A Scoping Review
Evaluación
Ergonomía
Desórdenes músculo-esqueléticos
Métodos de observación
Riesgo
Avaliação
Métodos de observação
Desordens musculoesqueléticas
Risco
Ergonomia
Assessment
Ergonomics
Musculoskeletal disorders
Observational methods
Risk
title_short Observational Methods for Assessing Ergonomic Risks for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A Scoping Review
title_full Observational Methods for Assessing Ergonomic Risks for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Observational Methods for Assessing Ergonomic Risks for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Observational Methods for Assessing Ergonomic Risks for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A Scoping Review
title_sort Observational Methods for Assessing Ergonomic Risks for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A Scoping Review
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Evaluación
Ergonomía
Desórdenes músculo-esqueléticos
Métodos de observación
Riesgo
topic Evaluación
Ergonomía
Desórdenes músculo-esqueléticos
Métodos de observación
Riesgo
Avaliação
Métodos de observação
Desordens musculoesqueléticas
Risco
Ergonomia
Assessment
Ergonomics
Musculoskeletal disorders
Observational methods
Risk
dc.subject.keyword.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação
Métodos de observação
Desordens musculoesqueléticas
Risco
Ergonomia
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv Assessment
Ergonomics
Musculoskeletal disorders
Observational methods
Risk
description Introduction: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDS) are one of the most common causes of absence from work. Exposures in the work environment can cause or aggravate the impact of these musculoskeletal disorders and the identification of ergonomic exposures are essential in risk assessment. It is important to assess all three key indicators of these exposures (intensity, frequency and duration) for being able to estimate the risk level for the development of WRMSDS. Aim: This paper aims to give an overview of some of the observational methods that can be used for assessment of ergonomic risks in the workplace. Methods: This study was conducted as a scoping review of the medical and ergonomic literature and official governmental web pages in Sweden, U.S.A. and the Netherlands. Results: In total, 19 different observational methods were identified. We summarize our findings based on the body parts that were studied and what key indicators were assessed: 1) intensity of the workload (posture and force production), 2) frequency of the workload (e.g. repetitive movements), and 3) the duration of the workload (e.g. static work). In an appendix, we included a brief presentation of these methods together with the worksheet (if available) and the source reference of the observational method. Conclusion: For ergonomists that perform risk assessments, there is a large number of observational assessment tools available and it is important to understand that different methods can be used simultaneously to be able to estimate the objective risk levels for WRMSDS.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2018-06-12
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-09T15:38:40Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-09T15:38:40Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.6840
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2145-4507
1692-7273
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/29445
url https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.6840
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/29445
identifier_str_mv 2145-4507
1692-7273
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
spa
language eng
spa
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 38
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 8
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciencias de la Salud
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 16
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Ciencias de la Salud; Vol. núm 16 (2018); 8-38
dc.relation.ispartof.eng.fl_str_mv Revista Ciencias de la Salud; Vol. 16 (2018); 8-38
dc.relation.ispartof.por.fl_str_mv Revista Ciencias de la Salud; v. 16 (2018); 8-38
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/revsalud/article/view/6840
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad del Rosario
dc.publisher.department.none.fl_str_mv Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Ciencias de la Salud
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/3364381e-3ff9-4216-822a-2cb0154231e6/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/0db518c6-135b-483f-a407-fb062875633f/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/71b22c3d-43d4-451c-9da1-494143dfc820/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 74c0594fbfca086516a9a21fdaa6c1e5
a299e4645905b22597581bd3763095e4
db52bf4c10ab750e486a57713ac77e0f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167484460171264
spelling ee1928cc-2704-4cf6-82a0-cca265b16e5d1aae0d73-42fb-4acf-96f2-b681212c7f142020-09-09T15:38:40Z2020-09-09T15:38:40Z2018-06-12Introduction: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDS) are one of the most common causes of absence from work. Exposures in the work environment can cause or aggravate the impact of these musculoskeletal disorders and the identification of ergonomic exposures are essential in risk assessment. It is important to assess all three key indicators of these exposures (intensity, frequency and duration) for being able to estimate the risk level for the development of WRMSDS. Aim: This paper aims to give an overview of some of the observational methods that can be used for assessment of ergonomic risks in the workplace. Methods: This study was conducted as a scoping review of the medical and ergonomic literature and official governmental web pages in Sweden, U.S.A. and the Netherlands. Results: In total, 19 different observational methods were identified. We summarize our findings based on the body parts that were studied and what key indicators were assessed: 1) intensity of the workload (posture and force production), 2) frequency of the workload (e.g. repetitive movements), and 3) the duration of the workload (e.g. static work). In an appendix, we included a brief presentation of these methods together with the worksheet (if available) and the source reference of the observational method. Conclusion: For ergonomists that perform risk assessments, there is a large number of observational assessment tools available and it is important to understand that different methods can be used simultaneously to be able to estimate the objective risk levels for WRMSDS.Introducción: Los desórdenes músculo-esqueléticos relacionados con el trabajo (DME) son una de las causas más comunes de la ausencia laboral. Las exposiciones en el entorno de trabajo pueden causar o agravar el impacto de estos desórdenes músculo-esqueléticos y la identificación de exposiciones ergonómicas es esencial en la evaluación de riesgos. Es importante evaluar los tres indicadores clave de estas exposiciones (intensidad, frecuencia y duración) para poder estimar el nivel de riesgo para el desarrollo de dme. Objetivo: Este artículo tiene como objetivo proporcionar una visión general de algunos de los métodos de observación que se pueden utilizar para evaluar los riesgos ergonómicos en el lugar de trabajo. Métodos: Este estudio se realizó como una revisión del alcance de la literatura médica y ergonómica y de las páginas web gubernamentales o ciales en Suecia, EE. UU. Y los Países Bajos. Resultados: En total, se identificaron 19 métodos de observación diferentes. Resumimos nuestros hallazgos en función de las partes del cuerpo que se estudiaron y los indicadores clave evaluados: 1) la intensidad de la carga de trabajo (postura y producción de fuerza), 2) la frecuencia de la carga de trabajo (por ejemplo, movimientos repetitivos) y 3) la duración de la carga de trabajo (por ejemplo, trabajo estático). En un apéndice incluimos una breve presentación de estos métodos junto con la hoja de trabajo (si estaba disponible) y la fuente de referencia del método de observación. Conclusión: Para los ergónomos que realizan evaluaciones de riesgo hay una gran cantidad de herramientas de evaluación observacional disponibles y es importante comprender que se pueden usar diferentes métodos simultáneamente para poder estimar los niveles de riesgo objetivo para DME.Introdução: as desordens musculoesqueléticas relacionadas com o trabalho (DME) são uma das causas mais comuns da ausência do trabalho. As exposições no entorno de trabalho podem causar ou agravar o impacto destas desordens musculoesqueléticas e a identificação de exposições ergonómicas são essenciais na avaliação de riscos. É importante avaliar os três indicadores chave destas exposições (intensidade, frequência e duração) para poder estimar o nível de risco para o desenvolvimento de DME. Objetivo: este artigo tem como objetivo proporcionar uma visão geral de alguns dos métodos de observação que se podem utilizar para avaliar os riscos ergonômicos no lugar de trabalho. Métodos: este estudo se realizou como uma revisão do alcance da literatura médica e ergonômica e dos sites governamentais o ciais na Suécia, nos Estados Unidos e nos Países Baixos. Resultados: em total, identificaram-se 19 métodos de observação diferentes. Resumimos os nossos achados em função das partes do corpo que se estudaram e os indicadores chave avaliados: 1) a intensidade da carga de trabalho (postura e produção de força), 2) a frequência da carga de trabalho (por exemplo, movimentos repetitivos) e 3) a duração da carga de trabalho (por exemplo, trabalho estático). Em um anexo incluímos uma breve apresentação destes métodos junto à folha de trabalho (se estava disponível) e a fonte de referência do método de observação. Conclusão: para os ergonomistas que realizam avaliações de risco, há uma grande quantidade de ferramentas de avaliação observacional disponíveis e é importante compreender que podem-se usar diferentes métodos simultaneamente para poder estimar os níveis de risco objetivo para DME.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.68402145-45071692-7273https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/29445engspaUniversidad del RosarioEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud388Revista Ciencias de la SaludVol. 16Revista Ciencias de la Salud; Vol. núm 16 (2018); 8-38Revista Ciencias de la Salud; Vol. 16 (2018); 8-38Revista Ciencias de la Salud; v. 16 (2018); 8-38https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/revsalud/article/view/6840Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Revista Ciencias de la Saludinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUREvaluaciónErgonomíaDesórdenes músculo-esqueléticosMétodos de observaciónRiesgoAvaliaçãoMétodos de observaçãoDesordens musculoesqueléticasRiscoErgonomiaAssessmentErgonomicsMusculoskeletal disordersObservational methodsRiskObservational Methods for Assessing Ergonomic Risks for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A Scoping ReviewMétodos observacionales para evaluar los riesgos ergonómicos de los Desórdenes Músculo esqueléticos relacionados con el trabajo: revisión del alcanceMétodos observacionais para avaliar os riscos ergonômicos das Desordens Musculoesqueléticas relacionados com o trabalho: revisão do alcancearticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes AndreasJohansson, ElinORIGINALObservational-Methods-for-Assessing.pdfObservational-Methods-for-Assessing.pdfapplication/pdf6106532https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/3364381e-3ff9-4216-822a-2cb0154231e6/download74c0594fbfca086516a9a21fdaa6c1e5MD51TEXTObservational-Methods-for-Assessing.pdf.txtObservational-Methods-for-Assessing.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain51734https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/0db518c6-135b-483f-a407-fb062875633f/downloada299e4645905b22597581bd3763095e4MD52THUMBNAILObservational-Methods-for-Assessing.pdf.jpgObservational-Methods-for-Assessing.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4007https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/71b22c3d-43d4-451c-9da1-494143dfc820/downloaddb52bf4c10ab750e486a57713ac77e0fMD5310336/29445oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/294452022-08-24 11:20:21.238269https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co