Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection
Objective: In the quadrivalent (types 6/11/16/18) HPV vaccine (GARDASIL®/SILGARD®) clinical program, 73% of women aged 16-26 were naïve to all vaccine HPV types. In these women, prophylactic administration of the vaccine was highly effective in preventing HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical disease. Of...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2009
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24233
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.5.10.9515
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24233
- Palabra clave:
- Placebo
Silgard
Unclassified drug
Virus dna
Wart virus vaccine
Adolescent
Adult
Article
Bronchospasm
Controlled study
Drug efficacy
Drug fatality
Drug tolerability
Drug withdrawal
Female
Gastroenteritis
Genital system examination
Gynecologic disease
Headache
Human
Human papillomavirus type 11
Human papillomavirus type 16
Human papillomavirus type 18
Human papillomavirus type 6
Human tissue
Hypertension
Injection site reaction
Major clinical study
Papanicolaou test
Prophylaxis
Serology
Unspecified side effect
Uterine cervix disease
Verruca vulgaris
Adolescent
Adult
Cervix uteri
Female
Follow-up studies
Humans
Papillomavirus infections
Papillomavirus vaccines
Placebos
Vulva
Young adult
Cervical cancer
Hpv
Vaccine
viral
Antibodies
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_e0a42ff6aab3664d05d6d7cd5bc54e0f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24233 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection |
title |
Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection Placebo Silgard Unclassified drug Virus dna Wart virus vaccine Adolescent Adult Article Bronchospasm Controlled study Drug efficacy Drug fatality Drug tolerability Drug withdrawal Female Gastroenteritis Genital system examination Gynecologic disease Headache Human Human papillomavirus type 11 Human papillomavirus type 16 Human papillomavirus type 18 Human papillomavirus type 6 Human tissue Hypertension Injection site reaction Major clinical study Papanicolaou test Prophylaxis Serology Unspecified side effect Uterine cervix disease Verruca vulgaris Adolescent Adult Cervix uteri Female Follow-up studies Humans Papillomavirus infections Papillomavirus vaccines Placebos Vulva Young adult Cervical cancer Hpv Vaccine viral Antibodies |
title_short |
Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection |
title_full |
Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection |
title_sort |
Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Placebo Silgard Unclassified drug Virus dna Wart virus vaccine Adolescent Adult Article Bronchospasm Controlled study Drug efficacy Drug fatality Drug tolerability Drug withdrawal Female Gastroenteritis Genital system examination Gynecologic disease Headache Human Human papillomavirus type 11 Human papillomavirus type 16 Human papillomavirus type 18 Human papillomavirus type 6 Human tissue Hypertension Injection site reaction Major clinical study Papanicolaou test Prophylaxis Serology Unspecified side effect Uterine cervix disease Verruca vulgaris Adolescent Adult Cervix uteri Female Follow-up studies Humans Papillomavirus infections Papillomavirus vaccines Placebos Vulva Young adult Cervical cancer Hpv Vaccine |
topic |
Placebo Silgard Unclassified drug Virus dna Wart virus vaccine Adolescent Adult Article Bronchospasm Controlled study Drug efficacy Drug fatality Drug tolerability Drug withdrawal Female Gastroenteritis Genital system examination Gynecologic disease Headache Human Human papillomavirus type 11 Human papillomavirus type 16 Human papillomavirus type 18 Human papillomavirus type 6 Human tissue Hypertension Injection site reaction Major clinical study Papanicolaou test Prophylaxis Serology Unspecified side effect Uterine cervix disease Verruca vulgaris Adolescent Adult Cervix uteri Female Follow-up studies Humans Papillomavirus infections Papillomavirus vaccines Placebos Vulva Young adult Cervical cancer Hpv Vaccine viral Antibodies |
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv |
viral Antibodies |
description |
Objective: In the quadrivalent (types 6/11/16/18) HPV vaccine (GARDASIL®/SILGARD®) clinical program, 73% of women aged 16-26 were naïve to all vaccine HPV types. In these women, prophylactic administration of the vaccine was highly effective in preventing HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical disease. Of the remaining women, 15% of had evidence of past infection with one or more vaccine HPV types (seropositive and DNA negative) at the time of enrollment. Here we present an analysis in this group of women to determine the efficacy of the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine against new cervical and external anogenital disease related to the same vaccine HPV type which had previously been cleared. Vaccine tolerability in this previously infected population was also assessed. Results: Subjects were followed for an average of 40 months. Seven subjects in the placebo group developed cervical disease, and eight subjects developed external genital disease related to a vaccine HPV type they had previously encountered. No subject receiving HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine developed disease to a vaccine HPV type to which they were seropositive and DNA negative at enrollment. Methods: 18,174 women were enrolled into three clinical studies. The data presented comprise a subset of these subjects (n = 2,617) who were HPV seropositive and DNA negative at enrollment (for ?1 vaccine type). In each study, subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine or placebo at day 1, month 2 and month 6 (without knowledge of baseline HPV status). Procedures performed for efficacy data evaluation included detailed genital examination, Pap testing and collection of cervicovaginal and external genital specimens. Analyses of efficacy were carried out in a population stratified by HPV serology and HPV DNA status at enrollment. Conclusions: These results suggest that natural HPV infection-elicited antibodies may not provide complete protection over time, however the immune response to the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine appears to prevent reinfection or reactivation of disease with vaccine HPV types. Vaccine-related adverse experiences were higher among subjects receiving vaccine, mostly due to increased injection site adverse experiences. © 2009 Landes Bioscience. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2009 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:10:31Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-26T00:10:31Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.5.10.9515 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24233 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.5.10.9515 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24233 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
704 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 10 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
696 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Human Vaccines |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 5 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Human Vaccines, Vol.5, No.10 (2009); pp. 696-704 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-74049150705&doi=10.4161%2fhv.5.10.9515&partnerID=40&md5=f3d269bfa9855e5304b050970be39935 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167670860283904 |
spelling |
ae576000-8e06-47d1-afd3-7574434de457-1ffe748c6-23ed-4754-adf1-84527c3d44b2-10847182e-d4df-4bb7-b2e9-42dc6402cb5a-1e25529dc-cd4a-447d-9eda-18f0a82c5244-12e73c444-f201-4623-aa5e-1d8aeec8106b-113c1da3c-bee1-4147-aa9e-4b520b37da26-11dfc1d2b-911c-4aca-8dcd-77db5e092a4279902b56-1260-48bf-8fd7-97bf45725e50-1504b7300-04a5-406b-a6d5-d206386d8a6a-121b17ad5-da43-4473-ac75-cd6358278eff-14b967e86-fe84-4e62-a46b-855f1226c4ad-156c0280f-efb4-473f-b9ab-edb70f0b044c-103ef061e-a38f-4d03-8596-7c87dbe9cb0c-1bc2cdcd6-2e08-41b8-932f-3ea9114b6808-188eef6b0-8f93-4dd4-96e0-14e598d1888d-1b551ece2-df3a-4662-91fc-22e828f35d2f-10eb0125d-8f20-4cf8-93b5-a7b6a601da81-1179a48a7-1b4f-46ce-8818-1ea0789c37c0-17b172036-a4af-49be-ad2c-4360dfb38656-16463eeea-3d60-44a2-aaba-911bc2de3f19-14cd412ad-04d3-43e4-b7e8-21574c8ad293-145acf31d-91c7-406c-a696-887b130ca595-1621b053d-c8de-47d7-88b0-bffec443a37f-1cf382937-82a9-424c-852d-15566313377f-14b9cf67f-d52b-4fd9-a155-f618d947fc3f-1ad5c4f4b-4180-4b8d-8891-9d177df065e5-107123748-cc30-49ab-b0c2-4c9a8dc0f6f7-139471bac-8196-4e6e-8f92-03caa31fa0a1-14ba3c9ff-f7e3-40cf-ba91-7a78e0229baa-1ca5ab306-07ea-421c-a5e6-c234c63e67a2-13895be73-620e-49d8-b19d-b9a51f47d28f-114b6b2c8-54dc-46d6-8192-48e20b0cf5b7-144fc33d3-c0c3-449f-9bac-553cb42e20fa-1d21ef069-2e52-4e75-a5a2-3404e48957f0-14d504e87-6b3f-44c7-9aeb-87b40a2e05d8-1fcc7ed92-f75c-4367-9c66-a79c4687f46a-12020-05-26T00:10:31Z2020-05-26T00:10:31Z2009Objective: In the quadrivalent (types 6/11/16/18) HPV vaccine (GARDASIL®/SILGARD®) clinical program, 73% of women aged 16-26 were naïve to all vaccine HPV types. In these women, prophylactic administration of the vaccine was highly effective in preventing HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical disease. Of the remaining women, 15% of had evidence of past infection with one or more vaccine HPV types (seropositive and DNA negative) at the time of enrollment. Here we present an analysis in this group of women to determine the efficacy of the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine against new cervical and external anogenital disease related to the same vaccine HPV type which had previously been cleared. Vaccine tolerability in this previously infected population was also assessed. Results: Subjects were followed for an average of 40 months. Seven subjects in the placebo group developed cervical disease, and eight subjects developed external genital disease related to a vaccine HPV type they had previously encountered. No subject receiving HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine developed disease to a vaccine HPV type to which they were seropositive and DNA negative at enrollment. Methods: 18,174 women were enrolled into three clinical studies. The data presented comprise a subset of these subjects (n = 2,617) who were HPV seropositive and DNA negative at enrollment (for ?1 vaccine type). In each study, subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine or placebo at day 1, month 2 and month 6 (without knowledge of baseline HPV status). Procedures performed for efficacy data evaluation included detailed genital examination, Pap testing and collection of cervicovaginal and external genital specimens. Analyses of efficacy were carried out in a population stratified by HPV serology and HPV DNA status at enrollment. Conclusions: These results suggest that natural HPV infection-elicited antibodies may not provide complete protection over time, however the immune response to the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine appears to prevent reinfection or reactivation of disease with vaccine HPV types. Vaccine-related adverse experiences were higher among subjects receiving vaccine, mostly due to increased injection site adverse experiences. © 2009 Landes Bioscience.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.4161/hv.5.10.9515https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24233eng704No. 10696Human VaccinesVol. 5Human Vaccines, Vol.5, No.10 (2009); pp. 696-704https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-74049150705&doi=10.4161%2fhv.5.10.9515&partnerID=40&md5=f3d269bfa9855e5304b050970be39935Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURPlaceboSilgardUnclassified drugVirus dnaWart virus vaccineAdolescentAdultArticleBronchospasmControlled studyDrug efficacyDrug fatalityDrug tolerabilityDrug withdrawalFemaleGastroenteritisGenital system examinationGynecologic diseaseHeadacheHumanHuman papillomavirus type 11Human papillomavirus type 16Human papillomavirus type 18Human papillomavirus type 6Human tissueHypertensionInjection site reactionMajor clinical studyPapanicolaou testProphylaxisSerologyUnspecified side effectUterine cervix diseaseVerruca vulgarisAdolescentAdultCervix uteriFemaleFollow-up studiesHumansPapillomavirus infectionsPapillomavirus vaccinesPlacebosVulvaYoung adultCervical cancerHpvVaccineviralAntibodiesEvaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infectionarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Olsson S.-E.Kjaer S.K.Sigurdsson K.Iversen O.-E.Hernandez-Avila M.Wheeler C.M.Perez, GonzaloBrown D.R.Koutsky L.A.Tay E.H.García P.Ault K.A.Garland S.M.Leodolter S.Tang G.W.K.Ferris D.G.Paavonen J.Lehtinen M.Steben M.Bosch F.X.Dillner J.Joura E.A.Majewski S.Muñoz N.Myers E.R.Villa L.L.Taddeo F.J.Roberts C.Tadesse A.Bryan J.Maansson R.Vuocolo S.Hesley T.M.Saah A.Barr E.Haupt R.M.10336/24233oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/242332023-06-09 15:16:16.979https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |