Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection

Objective: In the quadrivalent (types 6/11/16/18) HPV vaccine (GARDASIL®/SILGARD®) clinical program, 73% of women aged 16-26 were naïve to all vaccine HPV types. In these women, prophylactic administration of the vaccine was highly effective in preventing HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical disease. Of...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2009
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24233
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.5.10.9515
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24233
Palabra clave:
Placebo
Silgard
Unclassified drug
Virus dna
Wart virus vaccine
Adolescent
Adult
Article
Bronchospasm
Controlled study
Drug efficacy
Drug fatality
Drug tolerability
Drug withdrawal
Female
Gastroenteritis
Genital system examination
Gynecologic disease
Headache
Human
Human papillomavirus type 11
Human papillomavirus type 16
Human papillomavirus type 18
Human papillomavirus type 6
Human tissue
Hypertension
Injection site reaction
Major clinical study
Papanicolaou test
Prophylaxis
Serology
Unspecified side effect
Uterine cervix disease
Verruca vulgaris
Adolescent
Adult
Cervix uteri
Female
Follow-up studies
Humans
Papillomavirus infections
Papillomavirus vaccines
Placebos
Vulva
Young adult
Cervical cancer
Hpv
Vaccine
viral
Antibodies
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:Objective: In the quadrivalent (types 6/11/16/18) HPV vaccine (GARDASIL®/SILGARD®) clinical program, 73% of women aged 16-26 were naïve to all vaccine HPV types. In these women, prophylactic administration of the vaccine was highly effective in preventing HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical disease. Of the remaining women, 15% of had evidence of past infection with one or more vaccine HPV types (seropositive and DNA negative) at the time of enrollment. Here we present an analysis in this group of women to determine the efficacy of the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine against new cervical and external anogenital disease related to the same vaccine HPV type which had previously been cleared. Vaccine tolerability in this previously infected population was also assessed. Results: Subjects were followed for an average of 40 months. Seven subjects in the placebo group developed cervical disease, and eight subjects developed external genital disease related to a vaccine HPV type they had previously encountered. No subject receiving HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine developed disease to a vaccine HPV type to which they were seropositive and DNA negative at enrollment. Methods: 18,174 women were enrolled into three clinical studies. The data presented comprise a subset of these subjects (n = 2,617) who were HPV seropositive and DNA negative at enrollment (for ?1 vaccine type). In each study, subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine or placebo at day 1, month 2 and month 6 (without knowledge of baseline HPV status). Procedures performed for efficacy data evaluation included detailed genital examination, Pap testing and collection of cervicovaginal and external genital specimens. Analyses of efficacy were carried out in a population stratified by HPV serology and HPV DNA status at enrollment. Conclusions: These results suggest that natural HPV infection-elicited antibodies may not provide complete protection over time, however the immune response to the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine appears to prevent reinfection or reactivation of disease with vaccine HPV types. Vaccine-related adverse experiences were higher among subjects receiving vaccine, mostly due to increased injection site adverse experiences. © 2009 Landes Bioscience.