Heterogenous e ects of informality: An application to labor regulation policy in Russia

The paper estimates the heterogeneous returns of informality in Russia. The em-pirical strategy uses a Marginal Treatment Effect model (MTE). The data comes fromthe Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS) and a combination of regionaldata for the period 2009-2016. I also constructed a measure...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/18270
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_18270
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18270
Palabra clave:
Ventaja comparativa
Informalidad
Mercados laborales
Regulación laboral
Producción
Comparative advantage
Informality
Labor markets
Labor regulation
Marginal Treatment Effects
Ventaja comparativa (comercio internacional)
Economía informal
Mercado laboral
Congresos, conferencias, etc.
Rights
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
id EDOCUR2_de94d5b464e8a25ce508b42e82452200
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/18270
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling Heterogenous e ects of informality: An application to labor regulation policy in RussiaVentaja comparativaInformalidadMercados laboralesRegulación laboralProducciónComparative advantageInformalityLabor marketsLabor regulationMarginal Treatment EffectsVentaja comparativa (comercio internacional)Economía informalMercado laboralCongresos, conferencias, etc.The paper estimates the heterogeneous returns of informality in Russia. The em-pirical strategy uses a Marginal Treatment Effect model (MTE). The data comes fromthe Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS) and a combination of regionaldata for the period 2009-2016. I also constructed a measure of enforcement of laborregulation at the regional level that allows me to identify the parameters of the MTEmodel. I find that formal workers have, on average, 20% higher wage rates than in-formal workers. Additionally, the MTE has a negative slope, which reflects the factthat individuals with a higher propensity score of being formal are those who are morelikely to work formally -they have the largest positive gains of this type of jobs on theirearnings. My estimates also show that those individuals with a very low propensityof working formally can be negatively affected by having these types of jobs. Thesefindings suggest that the decision of working formally versus informally responds toa comparative advantage story and not segmentation of the labor market/ability hy-pothesis.Universidad del Rosario. Facultad de Economía2018-05-282018-08-08T20:48:55Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94fapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_18270http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18270instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURenghttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Otero, Andreaoai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/182702021-06-03T00:49:02Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Heterogenous e ects of informality: An application to labor regulation policy in Russia
title Heterogenous e ects of informality: An application to labor regulation policy in Russia
spellingShingle Heterogenous e ects of informality: An application to labor regulation policy in Russia
Ventaja comparativa
Informalidad
Mercados laborales
Regulación laboral
Producción
Comparative advantage
Informality
Labor markets
Labor regulation
Marginal Treatment Effects
Ventaja comparativa (comercio internacional)
Economía informal
Mercado laboral
Congresos, conferencias, etc.
title_short Heterogenous e ects of informality: An application to labor regulation policy in Russia
title_full Heterogenous e ects of informality: An application to labor regulation policy in Russia
title_fullStr Heterogenous e ects of informality: An application to labor regulation policy in Russia
title_full_unstemmed Heterogenous e ects of informality: An application to labor regulation policy in Russia
title_sort Heterogenous e ects of informality: An application to labor regulation policy in Russia
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ventaja comparativa
Informalidad
Mercados laborales
Regulación laboral
Producción
Comparative advantage
Informality
Labor markets
Labor regulation
Marginal Treatment Effects
Ventaja comparativa (comercio internacional)
Economía informal
Mercado laboral
Congresos, conferencias, etc.
topic Ventaja comparativa
Informalidad
Mercados laborales
Regulación laboral
Producción
Comparative advantage
Informality
Labor markets
Labor regulation
Marginal Treatment Effects
Ventaja comparativa (comercio internacional)
Economía informal
Mercado laboral
Congresos, conferencias, etc.
description The paper estimates the heterogeneous returns of informality in Russia. The em-pirical strategy uses a Marginal Treatment Effect model (MTE). The data comes fromthe Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS) and a combination of regionaldata for the period 2009-2016. I also constructed a measure of enforcement of laborregulation at the regional level that allows me to identify the parameters of the MTEmodel. I find that formal workers have, on average, 20% higher wage rates than in-formal workers. Additionally, the MTE has a negative slope, which reflects the factthat individuals with a higher propensity score of being formal are those who are morelikely to work formally -they have the largest positive gains of this type of jobs on theirearnings. My estimates also show that those individuals with a very low propensityof working formally can be negatively affected by having these types of jobs. Thesefindings suggest that the decision of working formally versus informally responds toa comparative advantage story and not segmentation of the labor market/ability hy-pothesis.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-28
2018-08-08T20:48:55Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_18270
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18270
url https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_18270
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18270
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Rosario. Facultad de Economía
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad del Rosario. Facultad de Economía
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
instname_str Universidad del Rosario
institution Universidad del Rosario
reponame_str Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
collection Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803710415385919488