Heterogenous e ects of informality: An application to labor regulation policy in Russia

The paper estimates the heterogeneous returns of informality in Russia. The em-pirical strategy uses a Marginal Treatment Effect model (MTE). The data comes fromthe Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS) and a combination of regionaldata for the period 2009-2016. I also constructed a measure...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/18270
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_18270
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/18270
Palabra clave:
Ventaja comparativa
Informalidad
Mercados laborales
Regulación laboral
Producción
Comparative advantage
Informality
Labor markets
Labor regulation
Marginal Treatment Effects
Ventaja comparativa (comercio internacional)
Economía informal
Mercado laboral
Congresos, conferencias, etc.
Rights
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
Description
Summary:The paper estimates the heterogeneous returns of informality in Russia. The em-pirical strategy uses a Marginal Treatment Effect model (MTE). The data comes fromthe Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS) and a combination of regionaldata for the period 2009-2016. I also constructed a measure of enforcement of laborregulation at the regional level that allows me to identify the parameters of the MTEmodel. I find that formal workers have, on average, 20% higher wage rates than in-formal workers. Additionally, the MTE has a negative slope, which reflects the factthat individuals with a higher propensity score of being formal are those who are morelikely to work formally -they have the largest positive gains of this type of jobs on theirearnings. My estimates also show that those individuals with a very low propensityof working formally can be negatively affected by having these types of jobs. Thesefindings suggest that the decision of working formally versus informally responds toa comparative advantage story and not segmentation of the labor market/ability hy-pothesis.