Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology

Objective Determining the Pugh multicriteria method's effectiveness as a selection tool when acquiring new technology. Materials and Methods The state of the art regarding multicriteria method use was studied; the Datum or Pugh method was selected. The size of the sample of experts participatin...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2009
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23143
Acceso en línea:
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23143
Palabra clave:
Biomedical technology
Decision-making support technique
Health facility acquisition
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_d8b77e2666931d85ea1602d384898594
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23143
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling e9f0fff6-32e9-4711-b87d-a1569d197e92-1669f5fc0-f17a-4b35-87f4-d3dbd334e7cc-1dbe51fe5-f973-4be8-8d27-986cee65253d-12020-05-25T23:59:59Z2020-05-25T23:59:59Z2009Objective Determining the Pugh multicriteria method's effectiveness as a selection tool when acquiring new technology. Materials and Methods The state of the art regarding multicriteria method use was studied; the Datum or Pugh method was selected. The size of the sample of experts participating in the trial was calculated and characterised; a data sample of 23 experts was thus obtained. Electrocardiography technology was selected by using the selected decision-making method; 5 models from different providers were used. Results 46 tests were conducted. The model labelled '3' was selected as referent in most cases, whilst the model labelled '5' was selected as being the best option in most cases. Conclusions The Pugh method was effective as a method for decision-making when selecting biomedical technologies as the same model was always selected by the experts as being the best option in 87% of the tests applied.application/pdf1240064https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23143spaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia773No. 5766Revista de Salud PublicaVol. 11Revista de Salud Publica, ISSN:1240064, Vol.11, No.5 (2009); pp. 766-773https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77950251020&partnerID=40&md5=656060cfa5e57e9ad39e356d6e178020Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURBiomedical technologyDecision-making support techniqueHealth facility acquisitionMeasuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technologyMedición de la eficiencia del método Datum para seleccionar tecnologías biomédicasarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Cruz A.M.Presiga-Lucena A.M.Rodriguez-Cortes I.C.ORIGINALv11n5a09.pdfapplication/pdf8632321https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/320fa28e-5852-4bab-aa58-864c6094b1c4/downloade5de8780aa5489e1676d4990dcc6fa6eMD51TEXTv11n5a09.pdf.txtv11n5a09.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain16993https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1107d1a5-179e-4622-bfe8-d844531009e1/downloadfa1fe133472fc54ba06890c9e71147faMD52THUMBNAILv11n5a09.pdf.jpgv11n5a09.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3587https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a332374e-12f1-47c5-98c0-3a1bd3bcf383/download1c977916c636a6fb65c224f639f97b91MD5310336/23143oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/231432022-05-02 07:37:19.158405https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv Medición de la eficiencia del método Datum para seleccionar tecnologías biomédicas
title Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology
spellingShingle Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology
Biomedical technology
Decision-making support technique
Health facility acquisition
title_short Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology
title_full Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology
title_fullStr Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology
title_sort Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Biomedical technology
Decision-making support technique
Health facility acquisition
topic Biomedical technology
Decision-making support technique
Health facility acquisition
description Objective Determining the Pugh multicriteria method's effectiveness as a selection tool when acquiring new technology. Materials and Methods The state of the art regarding multicriteria method use was studied; the Datum or Pugh method was selected. The size of the sample of experts participating in the trial was calculated and characterised; a data sample of 23 experts was thus obtained. Electrocardiography technology was selected by using the selected decision-making method; 5 models from different providers were used. Results 46 tests were conducted. The model labelled '3' was selected as referent in most cases, whilst the model labelled '5' was selected as being the best option in most cases. Conclusions The Pugh method was effective as a method for decision-making when selecting biomedical technologies as the same model was always selected by the experts as being the best option in 87% of the tests applied.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2009
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:59:59Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:59:59Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1240064
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23143
identifier_str_mv 1240064
url https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23143
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 773
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 5
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 766
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Salud Publica
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 11
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Revista de Salud Publica, ISSN:1240064, Vol.11, No.5 (2009); pp. 766-773
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77950251020&partnerID=40&md5=656060cfa5e57e9ad39e356d6e178020
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Colombia
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/320fa28e-5852-4bab-aa58-864c6094b1c4/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1107d1a5-179e-4622-bfe8-d844531009e1/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a332374e-12f1-47c5-98c0-3a1bd3bcf383/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e5de8780aa5489e1676d4990dcc6fa6e
fa1fe133472fc54ba06890c9e71147fa
1c977916c636a6fb65c224f639f97b91
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390594694742016