Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology
Objective Determining the Pugh multicriteria method's effectiveness as a selection tool when acquiring new technology. Materials and Methods The state of the art regarding multicriteria method use was studied; the Datum or Pugh method was selected. The size of the sample of experts participatin...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2009
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23143
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23143
- Palabra clave:
- Biomedical technology
Decision-making support technique
Health facility acquisition
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_d8b77e2666931d85ea1602d384898594 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23143 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
e9f0fff6-32e9-4711-b87d-a1569d197e92-1669f5fc0-f17a-4b35-87f4-d3dbd334e7cc-1dbe51fe5-f973-4be8-8d27-986cee65253d-12020-05-25T23:59:59Z2020-05-25T23:59:59Z2009Objective Determining the Pugh multicriteria method's effectiveness as a selection tool when acquiring new technology. Materials and Methods The state of the art regarding multicriteria method use was studied; the Datum or Pugh method was selected. The size of the sample of experts participating in the trial was calculated and characterised; a data sample of 23 experts was thus obtained. Electrocardiography technology was selected by using the selected decision-making method; 5 models from different providers were used. Results 46 tests were conducted. The model labelled '3' was selected as referent in most cases, whilst the model labelled '5' was selected as being the best option in most cases. Conclusions The Pugh method was effective as a method for decision-making when selecting biomedical technologies as the same model was always selected by the experts as being the best option in 87% of the tests applied.application/pdf1240064https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23143spaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia773No. 5766Revista de Salud PublicaVol. 11Revista de Salud Publica, ISSN:1240064, Vol.11, No.5 (2009); pp. 766-773https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77950251020&partnerID=40&md5=656060cfa5e57e9ad39e356d6e178020Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURBiomedical technologyDecision-making support techniqueHealth facility acquisitionMeasuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technologyMedición de la eficiencia del método Datum para seleccionar tecnologías biomédicasarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Cruz A.M.Presiga-Lucena A.M.Rodriguez-Cortes I.C.ORIGINALv11n5a09.pdfapplication/pdf8632321https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/320fa28e-5852-4bab-aa58-864c6094b1c4/downloade5de8780aa5489e1676d4990dcc6fa6eMD51TEXTv11n5a09.pdf.txtv11n5a09.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain16993https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1107d1a5-179e-4622-bfe8-d844531009e1/downloadfa1fe133472fc54ba06890c9e71147faMD52THUMBNAILv11n5a09.pdf.jpgv11n5a09.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3587https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a332374e-12f1-47c5-98c0-3a1bd3bcf383/download1c977916c636a6fb65c224f639f97b91MD5310336/23143oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/231432022-05-02 07:37:19.158405https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology |
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv |
Medición de la eficiencia del método Datum para seleccionar tecnologías biomédicas |
title |
Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology |
spellingShingle |
Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology Biomedical technology Decision-making support technique Health facility acquisition |
title_short |
Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology |
title_full |
Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology |
title_fullStr |
Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology |
title_sort |
Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Biomedical technology Decision-making support technique Health facility acquisition |
topic |
Biomedical technology Decision-making support technique Health facility acquisition |
description |
Objective Determining the Pugh multicriteria method's effectiveness as a selection tool when acquiring new technology. Materials and Methods The state of the art regarding multicriteria method use was studied; the Datum or Pugh method was selected. The size of the sample of experts participating in the trial was calculated and characterised; a data sample of 23 experts was thus obtained. Electrocardiography technology was selected by using the selected decision-making method; 5 models from different providers were used. Results 46 tests were conducted. The model labelled '3' was selected as referent in most cases, whilst the model labelled '5' was selected as being the best option in most cases. Conclusions The Pugh method was effective as a method for decision-making when selecting biomedical technologies as the same model was always selected by the experts as being the best option in 87% of the tests applied. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2009 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:59:59Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:59:59Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1240064 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23143 |
identifier_str_mv |
1240064 |
url |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23143 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
773 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 5 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
766 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Salud Publica |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 11 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Salud Publica, ISSN:1240064, Vol.11, No.5 (2009); pp. 766-773 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77950251020&partnerID=40&md5=656060cfa5e57e9ad39e356d6e178020 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/320fa28e-5852-4bab-aa58-864c6094b1c4/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1107d1a5-179e-4622-bfe8-d844531009e1/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a332374e-12f1-47c5-98c0-3a1bd3bcf383/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e5de8780aa5489e1676d4990dcc6fa6e fa1fe133472fc54ba06890c9e71147fa 1c977916c636a6fb65c224f639f97b91 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167446803709952 |