The influence of subdivision design and conservation of open space on carbon storage and sequestration

Cities are increasingly trying to offset carbon dioxide emissions and existing and new residential developments, or urban subdivisions, are a major source of such emissions. Compact or clustered subdivision designs have the potential to improve carbon storage and sequestration through the conservati...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2014
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/27079
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.001
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/27079
Palabra clave:
Carbon storage
Carbon sequestration
Compact design
Forest type
Open space
Tree stand age
Rights
License
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
id EDOCUR2_d49e68a2aff50dccdf20ff900a590d34
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/27079
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling e818b2d5-ff84-4e0d-b3c7-7e5f02286510-100d3254e-2fda-4504-9e62-2a7b3e66bf49-12d7c8bf2-67a1-46d2-a8e0-b82768ad86d9-1760fcdb2-a1e1-4b9e-adad-74645a8a0284-12020-08-19T14:40:56Z2020-08-19T14:40:56Z2014-11-01Cities are increasingly trying to offset carbon dioxide emissions and existing and new residential developments, or urban subdivisions, are a major source of such emissions. Compact or clustered subdivision designs have the potential to improve carbon storage and sequestration through the conservation of open space and the preservation of existing trees found on built lots. However, very few empirical studies assess how different subdivision designs and tree preservation strategies affect the carbon footprint of proposed residential developments. Using a 705 ha pine plantation that has been approved for the development of 1835 residential units near Gainesville, Florida, our objectives were to determine which site designs and tree preservation strategies could maximize carbon sequestration and storage. From 80 stratified random plots, we measured and analyzed tree and plot characteristics according to forest type and tree stand age categories. Tree data collected from these plots were analyzed with the i-Tree ECO model to estimate baseline predevelopment carbon stores and sequestration rates. Using ArcMap, we then assessed the impact, on baseline carbon sequestration and storage capacity, of several different site designs and tree conservation scenarios for the proposed development. Up to 91% of carbon storage and up to 82% of carbon sequestration could be maintained through a cluster urban development design and by preserving older tree stands. Results indicate that a subdivision's carbon footprint can significantly improve when forest types and tree preservation are incorporated into the design of a development.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.001ISSN: 0169-2046EISSN: 1872-6062https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/27079engElsevier7364Landscape and Urban PlanningVol. 131Landscape and Urban Planning, ISSN: 0169-2046;EISSN: 1872-6062, Vol.131 (2014); pp. 64-73https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204614001790Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecLandscape and Urban Planninginstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURCarbon storageCarbon sequestrationCompact designForest typeOpen spaceTree stand ageThe influence of subdivision design and conservation of open space on carbon storage and sequestrationLa influencia del diseño de subdivisiones y la conservación de espacios abiertos en el almacenamiento y secuestro de carbonoarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Vaughna, Richard M.Hostetler, MarkEscobedo, Francisco J.Jones, Pierce10336/27079oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/270792021-06-03 00:50:05.293https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv The influence of subdivision design and conservation of open space on carbon storage and sequestration
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv La influencia del diseño de subdivisiones y la conservación de espacios abiertos en el almacenamiento y secuestro de carbono
title The influence of subdivision design and conservation of open space on carbon storage and sequestration
spellingShingle The influence of subdivision design and conservation of open space on carbon storage and sequestration
Carbon storage
Carbon sequestration
Compact design
Forest type
Open space
Tree stand age
title_short The influence of subdivision design and conservation of open space on carbon storage and sequestration
title_full The influence of subdivision design and conservation of open space on carbon storage and sequestration
title_fullStr The influence of subdivision design and conservation of open space on carbon storage and sequestration
title_full_unstemmed The influence of subdivision design and conservation of open space on carbon storage and sequestration
title_sort The influence of subdivision design and conservation of open space on carbon storage and sequestration
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Carbon storage
Carbon sequestration
Compact design
Forest type
Open space
Tree stand age
topic Carbon storage
Carbon sequestration
Compact design
Forest type
Open space
Tree stand age
description Cities are increasingly trying to offset carbon dioxide emissions and existing and new residential developments, or urban subdivisions, are a major source of such emissions. Compact or clustered subdivision designs have the potential to improve carbon storage and sequestration through the conservation of open space and the preservation of existing trees found on built lots. However, very few empirical studies assess how different subdivision designs and tree preservation strategies affect the carbon footprint of proposed residential developments. Using a 705 ha pine plantation that has been approved for the development of 1835 residential units near Gainesville, Florida, our objectives were to determine which site designs and tree preservation strategies could maximize carbon sequestration and storage. From 80 stratified random plots, we measured and analyzed tree and plot characteristics according to forest type and tree stand age categories. Tree data collected from these plots were analyzed with the i-Tree ECO model to estimate baseline predevelopment carbon stores and sequestration rates. Using ArcMap, we then assessed the impact, on baseline carbon sequestration and storage capacity, of several different site designs and tree conservation scenarios for the proposed development. Up to 91% of carbon storage and up to 82% of carbon sequestration could be maintained through a cluster urban development design and by preserving older tree stands. Results indicate that a subdivision's carbon footprint can significantly improve when forest types and tree preservation are incorporated into the design of a development.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2014-11-01
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-19T14:40:56Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-19T14:40:56Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.001
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv ISSN: 0169-2046
EISSN: 1872-6062
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/27079
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.001
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/27079
identifier_str_mv ISSN: 0169-2046
EISSN: 1872-6062
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 73
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 64
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Landscape and Urban Planning
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 131
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Landscape and Urban Planning, ISSN: 0169-2046;EISSN: 1872-6062, Vol.131 (2014); pp. 64-73
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204614001790
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
rights_invalid_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Landscape and Urban Planning
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167718811664384