Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results

Background Arthroplasty registries are a relevant source of information for research and quality improvement in patient care and its value depends on the quality of the recorded data. The purpose of this study is to describe a model of validation and present the findings of validation of an Institut...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22239
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.030
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22239
Palabra clave:
Antibiotic agent
Adult
Aged
Arthroplasty
Article
Clinical outcome
Controlled study
Data processing
Data quality
Demography
Error
Female
Hip arthroplasty
Human
Knee arthroplasty
Major clinical study
Male
Measurement accuracy
Patient compliance
Quality control
Range of motion
Register
Shoulder arthroplasty
Thrombosis prevention
Validation study
Arthroplasty
Factual database
Hip replacement
Knee replacement
Medical record
Methodology
Middle aged
Register
Reoperation
Statistics and numerical data
Total quality management
Treatment outcome
Very elderly
Young adult
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty
Data accuracy
Female
Humans
Male
Medical records
Middle aged
Quality improvement
Registries
Reoperation
Research design
Treatment outcome
Young adult
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty registers
Data sources
Replacement
Validation studies
replacement
factual
replacement
knee
hip
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty
Databases
Rights
License
Bloqueado (Texto referencial)
id EDOCUR2_c0c6878d9781f3d21fa96771a01f9f2d
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22239
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results
title Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results
spellingShingle Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results
Antibiotic agent
Adult
Aged
Arthroplasty
Article
Clinical outcome
Controlled study
Data processing
Data quality
Demography
Error
Female
Hip arthroplasty
Human
Knee arthroplasty
Major clinical study
Male
Measurement accuracy
Patient compliance
Quality control
Range of motion
Register
Shoulder arthroplasty
Thrombosis prevention
Validation study
Arthroplasty
Factual database
Hip replacement
Knee replacement
Medical record
Methodology
Middle aged
Register
Reoperation
Statistics and numerical data
Total quality management
Treatment outcome
Very elderly
Young adult
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty
Data accuracy
Female
Humans
Male
Medical records
Middle aged
Quality improvement
Registries
Reoperation
Research design
Treatment outcome
Young adult
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty registers
Data sources
Replacement
Validation studies
replacement
factual
replacement
knee
hip
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty
Databases
title_short Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results
title_full Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results
title_fullStr Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results
title_full_unstemmed Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results
title_sort Data Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary Results
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Antibiotic agent
Adult
Aged
Arthroplasty
Article
Clinical outcome
Controlled study
Data processing
Data quality
Demography
Error
Female
Hip arthroplasty
Human
Knee arthroplasty
Major clinical study
Male
Measurement accuracy
Patient compliance
Quality control
Range of motion
Register
Shoulder arthroplasty
Thrombosis prevention
Validation study
Arthroplasty
Factual database
Hip replacement
Knee replacement
Medical record
Methodology
Middle aged
Register
Reoperation
Statistics and numerical data
Total quality management
Treatment outcome
Very elderly
Young adult
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty
Data accuracy
Female
Humans
Male
Medical records
Middle aged
Quality improvement
Registries
Reoperation
Research design
Treatment outcome
Young adult
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty registers
Data sources
Replacement
Validation studies
topic Antibiotic agent
Adult
Aged
Arthroplasty
Article
Clinical outcome
Controlled study
Data processing
Data quality
Demography
Error
Female
Hip arthroplasty
Human
Knee arthroplasty
Major clinical study
Male
Measurement accuracy
Patient compliance
Quality control
Range of motion
Register
Shoulder arthroplasty
Thrombosis prevention
Validation study
Arthroplasty
Factual database
Hip replacement
Knee replacement
Medical record
Methodology
Middle aged
Register
Reoperation
Statistics and numerical data
Total quality management
Treatment outcome
Very elderly
Young adult
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty
Data accuracy
Female
Humans
Male
Medical records
Middle aged
Quality improvement
Registries
Reoperation
Research design
Treatment outcome
Young adult
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty registers
Data sources
Replacement
Validation studies
replacement
factual
replacement
knee
hip
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty
Databases
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv replacement
factual
replacement
knee
hip
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty
Databases
description Background Arthroplasty registries are a relevant source of information for research and quality improvement in patient care and its value depends on the quality of the recorded data. The purpose of this study is to describe a model of validation and present the findings of validation of an Institutional Arthroplasty Registry (IAR). Methods Information from 209 primary arthroplasties and revision surgeries of the hip, knee, and shoulder recorded in the IAR between March and September 2015 were analyzed in the following domains. Adherence is defined as the proportion of patients included in the registry, completeness is defined as the proportion of data effectively recorded, and accuracy is defined as the proportion of data consistent with medical records. A random sample of 53 patients (25.4%) was selected to assess the latest 2 domains. A direct comparison between the registry's database and medical records was performed. Results In total, 324 variables containing information on demographic data, surgical procedure, clinical outcomes, and key performance indicators were analyzed. Two hundred nine of 212 patients who underwent surgery during the study period were included in the registry, accounting for an adherence of 98.6%. Completeness was 91.7% and accuracy was 85.8%. Most errors were found in the preoperative range of motion and timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics and thromboprophylaxis. Conclusion This model provides useful information regarding the quality of the recorded data since it identified deficient areas within the IAR. We recommend that institutional arthroplasty registries be constantly monitored for data quality before using their information for research or quality improvement purposes. © 2017 Elsevier Inc.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:55:51Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:55:51Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.030
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 08835403
15328406
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22239
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.030
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22239
identifier_str_mv 08835403
15328406
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 2069
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 7
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 2065
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Arthroplasty
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 32
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN:08835403, 15328406, Vol.32, No.7 (2017); pp. 2065-2069
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019681815&doi=10.1016%2fj.arth.2017.02.030&partnerID=40&md5=0fbce0214395183cd996bc748bebcad1
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Bloqueado (Texto referencial)
rights_invalid_str_mv Bloqueado (Texto referencial)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Churchill Livingstone Inc.
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1f256f0f-6b4b-46df-9db5-85f1f7976d2d/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a076a583-b6ee-4ea6-a71b-73e8f3aa9c0e/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f61a1d1a-ddb5-4353-b732-768d1bf6d161/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 87aaecc87ec5d1904fe7647a156d05f8
6609ef37e9b3c30bd5af0c78cff52082
1c82f84032236b8c578d1dd381394c98
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167632321970176
spelling c0882ec3-326e-4948-bd08-57b556ab0744-109a7731f-8e65-4ef9-8976-3216910e3f85-1ac961279-e558-4518-9768-e3c9f3f33c1f-1ac7e95e4-60b8-47f2-b60d-319faccb539d-1fab438f1-6f78-466a-a919-f8857d2432b4-11084849c-2a2e-4cb0-9d67-9ca5f8f8bce9-12020-05-25T23:55:51Z2020-05-25T23:55:51Z2017Background Arthroplasty registries are a relevant source of information for research and quality improvement in patient care and its value depends on the quality of the recorded data. The purpose of this study is to describe a model of validation and present the findings of validation of an Institutional Arthroplasty Registry (IAR). Methods Information from 209 primary arthroplasties and revision surgeries of the hip, knee, and shoulder recorded in the IAR between March and September 2015 were analyzed in the following domains. Adherence is defined as the proportion of patients included in the registry, completeness is defined as the proportion of data effectively recorded, and accuracy is defined as the proportion of data consistent with medical records. A random sample of 53 patients (25.4%) was selected to assess the latest 2 domains. A direct comparison between the registry's database and medical records was performed. Results In total, 324 variables containing information on demographic data, surgical procedure, clinical outcomes, and key performance indicators were analyzed. Two hundred nine of 212 patients who underwent surgery during the study period were included in the registry, accounting for an adherence of 98.6%. Completeness was 91.7% and accuracy was 85.8%. Most errors were found in the preoperative range of motion and timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics and thromboprophylaxis. Conclusion This model provides useful information regarding the quality of the recorded data since it identified deficient areas within the IAR. We recommend that institutional arthroplasty registries be constantly monitored for data quality before using their information for research or quality improvement purposes. © 2017 Elsevier Inc.2021-04-02: Script de automatizacion de embargos. El articulo no puede estar en texto completo disponible. este erro se cometió al validad cuales se podían cargar al repositorio. Quien valido la disponibilidad del documento estaba logueado en el portal de Sciencedirect con las credenciales de la universidad y al poder ver el texto completo creyó que estaba en texto completo. se estima que el 80% de los artículos publicados en Sciencedeirect y cargados al RI presentan esta falla.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.0300883540315328406https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22239engChurchill Livingstone Inc.2069No. 72065Journal of ArthroplastyVol. 32Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN:08835403, 15328406, Vol.32, No.7 (2017); pp. 2065-2069https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019681815&doi=10.1016%2fj.arth.2017.02.030&partnerID=40&md5=0fbce0214395183cd996bc748bebcad1Bloqueado (Texto referencial)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURAntibiotic agentAdultAgedArthroplastyArticleClinical outcomeControlled studyData processingData qualityDemographyErrorFemaleHip arthroplastyHumanKnee arthroplastyMajor clinical studyMaleMeasurement accuracyPatient complianceQuality controlRange of motionRegisterShoulder arthroplastyThrombosis preventionValidation studyArthroplastyFactual databaseHip replacementKnee replacementMedical recordMethodologyMiddle agedRegisterReoperationStatistics and numerical dataTotal quality managementTreatment outcomeVery elderlyYoung adultAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplastyData accuracyFemaleHumansMaleMedical recordsMiddle agedQuality improvementRegistriesReoperationResearch designTreatment outcomeYoung adultArthroplastyArthroplasty registersData sourcesReplacementValidation studiesreplacementfactualreplacementkneehipArthroplastyArthroplastyDatabasesData Quality in Institutional Arthroplasty Registries: Description of a Model of Validation and Report of Preliminary ResultsarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Bautista M.P.Bonilla G.A.Mieth K.W.Llinás A.M.Rodríguez F.Cárdenas L.L.ORIGINAL1-s2-0-S0883540317301481-main.pdfapplication/pdf363427https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1f256f0f-6b4b-46df-9db5-85f1f7976d2d/download87aaecc87ec5d1904fe7647a156d05f8MD51TEXT1-s2-0-S0883540317301481-main.pdf.txt1-s2-0-S0883540317301481-main.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain26115https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/a076a583-b6ee-4ea6-a71b-73e8f3aa9c0e/download6609ef37e9b3c30bd5af0c78cff52082MD52THUMBNAIL1-s2-0-S0883540317301481-main.pdf.jpg1-s2-0-S0883540317301481-main.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4701https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/f61a1d1a-ddb5-4353-b732-768d1bf6d161/download1c82f84032236b8c578d1dd381394c98MD5310336/22239oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/222392022-05-02 07:37:18.227187https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co