The role of body adiposity index in determining body fat percentage in colombian adults with overweight or obesity

The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of body adiposity index (BAI) as a convenient tool for assessing body fat percentage (BF%) in a sample of adults with overweight/obesity using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The study population was composed of 96 volunteers (60% female,...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24352
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101093
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24352
Palabra clave:
Adult
Ethnic group
Fat reserve
Obesity
Prediction
Action potential
Adult
Age distribution
Anthropometric parameters
Article
Body adiposity index
Body fat percentage
Body height
Body mass
Cohort analysis
Colombia
Controlled study
Correlation coefficient
Diet
Female
Hip circumference
Human
Impedance
Major clinical study
Male
Measurement accuracy
Obesity
Population research
Sex difference
Social status
Student t test
Waist circumference
Waist hip ratio
Adipose tissue
Epidemiology
Hispanic
Middle aged
Pathophysiology
Physiology
Reproducibility
Statistics and numerical data
Waist to height ratio
Colombia
Adipose tissue
Adiposity
Adult
Body mass index
Colombia
Female
Hispanic americans
Humans
Male
Middle aged
Obesity
Overweight
Reproducibility of results
Waist circumference
Waist-height ratio
Adults
Body composition
Obesity
Prediction
Validity
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of body adiposity index (BAI) as a convenient tool for assessing body fat percentage (BF%) in a sample of adults with overweight/obesity using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The study population was composed of 96 volunteers (60% female, mean age 40.6 ± 7.5 years old). Anthropometric characteristics (body mass index, height, waist-to-height ratio, hip and waist circumference), socioeconomic status, and diet were assessed, and BF% was measured by BIA-BF% and by BAIBF%. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between BAI-BF% and BF% assessed by BIA-BF%, while controlling for potential confounders. The concordance between the BF% measured by both methods was obtained with a paired sample t-test, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman plot analysis. Overall, the correlation between BF% obtained by BIA-BF% and estimated by BAI-BF% was r = 0.885, p less than 0.001, after adjusting for potential confounders (age, socioeconomic status, and diet). Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was moderate in both sexes. In the men, the paired t-test showed a significant mean difference in BF% between the methods (-5.6 (95%CI -6.4 to -4.8); p less than 0.001). In the women, these differences were (-3.6 (95%CI -4.7 to -2.5); p less than 0.001). Overall, the bias of the BAI-BF% was -4.8 ± 3.2 BF%; p less than 0.001), indicating that the BAI-BF% method significantly underestimated the BF% in comparison with the reference method. In adults with overweight/obesity, the BAI presents low agreement with BF% measured by BIA-BF%; therefore, we conclude that BIA-BF% is not accurate in either sex when body fat percentage levels are low or high. Further studies are necessary to confirm our findings in different ethnic groups. © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.