Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character

Despite the recent attention given to moral character in moral psychology and moral philosophy, there is little evidence on how the folk concept of character is structured. Virtue ethics literature suggests a number of views formalizing how different virtues or vices are structured in overall virtuo...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22802
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1719396
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22802
Palabra clave:
Character
Experimental ?philosophy
Folk ?psychology
Virtue ?ethics
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_bcfc9b8987f53795435639343c5a5356
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22802
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 11256801116000918080e-01ab-430c-b690-3aee301ea3ac-12020-05-25T23:58:06Z2020-05-25T23:58:06Z2020Despite the recent attention given to moral character in moral psychology and moral philosophy, there is little evidence on how the folk concept of character is structured. Virtue ethics literature suggests a number of views formalizing how different virtues or vices are structured in overall virtuous or vicious character. The Unity of Virtues View (UV) assumes that any virtue implies all other virtues through practical wisdom. On the contrary, the Disunity of Virtues View (DUV) argues that different virtues or vices do not imply one another. Finally, the Limited Unity of Virtues View (LUV) suggests that UV is true when considering specific spheres of life but DUV is true when considering overall character. Here, we report an experiment that suggests that the folk concept of moral character follows an intuitive Limited Unity of Virtues view. Also, folk beliefs about moral character differ between virtuous and vicious character. The psychological and philosophical implications of these findings are discussed. Materials (in Spanish) and data analysis scripts for all studies are available in OSF: https://osf.io/72ywp/. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1719396095150891465394Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22802engRoutledge350No. 3332Philosophical PsychologyVol. 33Philosophical Psychology, ISSN:09515089, 1465394X, Vol.33, No.3 (2020); pp. 332-350https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079268927&doi=10.1080%2f09515089.2020.1719396&partnerID=40&md5=a9e3e4dbb29bbdc86e73a7e77b726be8Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURCharacterExperimental ?philosophyFolk ?psychologyVirtue ?ethicsVirtues disunited and the folk psychology of characterarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Barbosa de la Torre, SergioJiménez-Leal, William10336/22802oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/228022022-05-02 07:37:20.653403https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character
title Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character
spellingShingle Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character
Character
Experimental ?philosophy
Folk ?psychology
Virtue ?ethics
title_short Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character
title_full Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character
title_fullStr Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character
title_full_unstemmed Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character
title_sort Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Character
Experimental ?philosophy
Folk ?psychology
Virtue ?ethics
topic Character
Experimental ?philosophy
Folk ?psychology
Virtue ?ethics
description Despite the recent attention given to moral character in moral psychology and moral philosophy, there is little evidence on how the folk concept of character is structured. Virtue ethics literature suggests a number of views formalizing how different virtues or vices are structured in overall virtuous or vicious character. The Unity of Virtues View (UV) assumes that any virtue implies all other virtues through practical wisdom. On the contrary, the Disunity of Virtues View (DUV) argues that different virtues or vices do not imply one another. Finally, the Limited Unity of Virtues View (LUV) suggests that UV is true when considering specific spheres of life but DUV is true when considering overall character. Here, we report an experiment that suggests that the folk concept of moral character follows an intuitive Limited Unity of Virtues view. Also, folk beliefs about moral character differ between virtuous and vicious character. The psychological and philosophical implications of these findings are discussed. Materials (in Spanish) and data analysis scripts for all studies are available in OSF: https://osf.io/72ywp/. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:58:06Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:58:06Z
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1719396
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 09515089
1465394X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22802
url https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1719396
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22802
identifier_str_mv 09515089
1465394X
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 350
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 3
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 332
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Philosophical Psychology
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 33
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Philosophical Psychology, ISSN:09515089, 1465394X, Vol.33, No.3 (2020); pp. 332-350
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079268927&doi=10.1080%2f09515089.2020.1719396&partnerID=40&md5=a9e3e4dbb29bbdc86e73a7e77b726be8
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Routledge
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390643123224576