Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character
Despite the recent attention given to moral character in moral psychology and moral philosophy, there is little evidence on how the folk concept of character is structured. Virtue ethics literature suggests a number of views formalizing how different virtues or vices are structured in overall virtuo...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22802
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1719396
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22802
- Palabra clave:
- Character
Experimental ?philosophy
Folk ?psychology
Virtue ?ethics
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_bcfc9b8987f53795435639343c5a5356 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22802 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
11256801116000918080e-01ab-430c-b690-3aee301ea3ac-12020-05-25T23:58:06Z2020-05-25T23:58:06Z2020Despite the recent attention given to moral character in moral psychology and moral philosophy, there is little evidence on how the folk concept of character is structured. Virtue ethics literature suggests a number of views formalizing how different virtues or vices are structured in overall virtuous or vicious character. The Unity of Virtues View (UV) assumes that any virtue implies all other virtues through practical wisdom. On the contrary, the Disunity of Virtues View (DUV) argues that different virtues or vices do not imply one another. Finally, the Limited Unity of Virtues View (LUV) suggests that UV is true when considering specific spheres of life but DUV is true when considering overall character. Here, we report an experiment that suggests that the folk concept of moral character follows an intuitive Limited Unity of Virtues view. Also, folk beliefs about moral character differ between virtuous and vicious character. The psychological and philosophical implications of these findings are discussed. Materials (in Spanish) and data analysis scripts for all studies are available in OSF: https://osf.io/72ywp/. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1719396095150891465394Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22802engRoutledge350No. 3332Philosophical PsychologyVol. 33Philosophical Psychology, ISSN:09515089, 1465394X, Vol.33, No.3 (2020); pp. 332-350https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079268927&doi=10.1080%2f09515089.2020.1719396&partnerID=40&md5=a9e3e4dbb29bbdc86e73a7e77b726be8Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURCharacterExperimental ?philosophyFolk ?psychologyVirtue ?ethicsVirtues disunited and the folk psychology of characterarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Barbosa de la Torre, SergioJiménez-Leal, William10336/22802oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/228022022-05-02 07:37:20.653403https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character |
title |
Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character |
spellingShingle |
Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character Character Experimental ?philosophy Folk ?psychology Virtue ?ethics |
title_short |
Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character |
title_full |
Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character |
title_fullStr |
Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character |
title_full_unstemmed |
Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character |
title_sort |
Virtues disunited and the folk psychology of character |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Character Experimental ?philosophy Folk ?psychology Virtue ?ethics |
topic |
Character Experimental ?philosophy Folk ?psychology Virtue ?ethics |
description |
Despite the recent attention given to moral character in moral psychology and moral philosophy, there is little evidence on how the folk concept of character is structured. Virtue ethics literature suggests a number of views formalizing how different virtues or vices are structured in overall virtuous or vicious character. The Unity of Virtues View (UV) assumes that any virtue implies all other virtues through practical wisdom. On the contrary, the Disunity of Virtues View (DUV) argues that different virtues or vices do not imply one another. Finally, the Limited Unity of Virtues View (LUV) suggests that UV is true when considering specific spheres of life but DUV is true when considering overall character. Here, we report an experiment that suggests that the folk concept of moral character follows an intuitive Limited Unity of Virtues view. Also, folk beliefs about moral character differ between virtuous and vicious character. The psychological and philosophical implications of these findings are discussed. Materials (in Spanish) and data analysis scripts for all studies are available in OSF: https://osf.io/72ywp/. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:58:06Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-25T23:58:06Z |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1719396 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
09515089 1465394X |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22802 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1719396 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22802 |
identifier_str_mv |
09515089 1465394X |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
350 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 3 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
332 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Philosophical Psychology |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 33 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Philosophical Psychology, ISSN:09515089, 1465394X, Vol.33, No.3 (2020); pp. 332-350 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079268927&doi=10.1080%2f09515089.2020.1719396&partnerID=40&md5=a9e3e4dbb29bbdc86e73a7e77b726be8 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Routledge |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1828160660060504064 |