Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees

Over the past decade or so it has become increasingly popular to use reconstructed evolutionary trees to investigate questions about the rates of speciation and extinction. Although the methodology of this field has grown substantially in its sophistication in recent years, here I will take a step b...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/20309
Acceso en línea:
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20309
Palabra clave:
Comparative Methods
Maximum Likelihood
Phylogeny
Plantas leñosas
Diversidad de cultivos
Métodos comparativos
Filogenia (Botánica)
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_bb8f16542053f4cecc0937f018f38044
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/20309
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling a42144e3-6b25-4cd0-af30-9fc2085953896002019-09-23T12:54:26Z2019-09-23T12:54:26Z20182018Over the past decade or so it has become increasingly popular to use reconstructed evolutionary trees to investigate questions about the rates of speciation and extinction. Although the methodology of this field has grown substantially in its sophistication in recent years, here I will take a step back to present a very simple model that is designed to investigate the relatively straightforward question of whether the tempo of diversification (speciation and extinction) differs between two or more phylogenetic trees, without attempting to attribute a causal basis to this difference. It is a likelihood method, and I demonstrate that it generally shows type I error that is close to the nominal level. I also demonstrate that parameter estimates obtained with this approach are largely unbiased. As this method can be used to compare trees of unknown relationship, it will be particularly well-suited to problems in which a difference in diversification rate between clades is suspected, but in which these clades are not particularly closely related. As diversification methods can easily take into account an incomplete sampling fraction, but missing lineages are assumed to be missing at random, this method is also appropriate for cases in which we have hypothesized a difference in the process of diversification between two or more focal clades, but in which many unsampled groups separate the few of interest. The method of this study is by no means an attempt to replace more sophisticated models in which, for instance, diversification depends on the state of an observed or unobserved discrete or continuous trait. Rather, my intention is to provide a complementary approach for circumstances in which a simpler hypothesis is warranted and of biological interest. © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.application/pdf10.1002/ece3.40302045-7758https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20309eng53125303Ecology and EvolutionVol. 8Ecology and Evolution, ISSN:2045-7758, Vol. 8 (2018) pp. 5303-5312https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.4030Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Alfaro, M.E., Santini, F., Brock, C., Alamillo, H., Dornburg, A., Rabosky, D.L., Harmon, L.J., Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates (2009) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, pp. 13410-13414. , https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811087106instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURComparative MethodsMaximum LikelihoodPhylogenyPlantas leñosas715600Diversidad de cultivosMétodos comparativosFilogenia (Botánica)Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic treesarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Revell, Liam JRevell, Liam JORIGINAL44.pdfapplication/pdf531601https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/4c4ddada-ce20-468a-a862-7acd3c16b8b4/downloada8b73f22aa02744c99d35209413eeb2eMD51TEXT44.pdf.txt44.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain53742https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1d3c4493-5d9a-43ca-ad80-49cea7417c61/downloadee6f03a40b57d9d80a3c111e6088c729MD52THUMBNAIL44.pdf.jpg44.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4098https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/91a2a770-2166-4dbb-9c54-4749ec33db73/download488abb92211b554d800211c1e9baac69MD5310336/20309oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/203092020-02-12 16:21:19.436https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees
title Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees
spellingShingle Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees
Comparative Methods
Maximum Likelihood
Phylogeny
Plantas leñosas
Diversidad de cultivos
Métodos comparativos
Filogenia (Botánica)
title_short Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees
title_full Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees
title_fullStr Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees
title_sort Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Comparative Methods
Maximum Likelihood
Phylogeny
topic Comparative Methods
Maximum Likelihood
Phylogeny
Plantas leñosas
Diversidad de cultivos
Métodos comparativos
Filogenia (Botánica)
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv Plantas leñosas
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv Diversidad de cultivos
Métodos comparativos
Filogenia (Botánica)
description Over the past decade or so it has become increasingly popular to use reconstructed evolutionary trees to investigate questions about the rates of speciation and extinction. Although the methodology of this field has grown substantially in its sophistication in recent years, here I will take a step back to present a very simple model that is designed to investigate the relatively straightforward question of whether the tempo of diversification (speciation and extinction) differs between two or more phylogenetic trees, without attempting to attribute a causal basis to this difference. It is a likelihood method, and I demonstrate that it generally shows type I error that is close to the nominal level. I also demonstrate that parameter estimates obtained with this approach are largely unbiased. As this method can be used to compare trees of unknown relationship, it will be particularly well-suited to problems in which a difference in diversification rate between clades is suspected, but in which these clades are not particularly closely related. As diversification methods can easily take into account an incomplete sampling fraction, but missing lineages are assumed to be missing at random, this method is also appropriate for cases in which we have hypothesized a difference in the process of diversification between two or more focal clades, but in which many unsampled groups separate the few of interest. The method of this study is by no means an attempt to replace more sophisticated models in which, for instance, diversification depends on the state of an observed or unobserved discrete or continuous trait. Rather, my intention is to provide a complementary approach for circumstances in which a simpler hypothesis is warranted and of biological interest. © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-23T12:54:26Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-23T12:54:26Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1002/ece3.4030
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2045-7758
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20309
identifier_str_mv 10.1002/ece3.4030
2045-7758
url https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20309
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 5312
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 5303
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Ecology and Evolution
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 8
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Ecology and Evolution, ISSN:2045-7758, Vol. 8 (2018) pp. 5303-5312
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.4030
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv Alfaro, M.E., Santini, F., Brock, C., Alamillo, H., Dornburg, A., Rabosky, D.L., Harmon, L.J., Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates (2009) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, pp. 13410-13414. , https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811087106
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/4c4ddada-ce20-468a-a862-7acd3c16b8b4/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1d3c4493-5d9a-43ca-ad80-49cea7417c61/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/91a2a770-2166-4dbb-9c54-4749ec33db73/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv a8b73f22aa02744c99d35209413eeb2e
ee6f03a40b57d9d80a3c111e6088c729
488abb92211b554d800211c1e9baac69
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167549074472960