Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees
Over the past decade or so it has become increasingly popular to use reconstructed evolutionary trees to investigate questions about the rates of speciation and extinction. Although the methodology of this field has grown substantially in its sophistication in recent years, here I will take a step b...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/20309
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20309
- Palabra clave:
- Comparative Methods
Maximum Likelihood
Phylogeny
Plantas leñosas
Diversidad de cultivos
Métodos comparativos
Filogenia (Botánica)
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)
id |
EDOCUR2_bb8f16542053f4cecc0937f018f38044 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/20309 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
a42144e3-6b25-4cd0-af30-9fc2085953896002019-09-23T12:54:26Z2019-09-23T12:54:26Z20182018Over the past decade or so it has become increasingly popular to use reconstructed evolutionary trees to investigate questions about the rates of speciation and extinction. Although the methodology of this field has grown substantially in its sophistication in recent years, here I will take a step back to present a very simple model that is designed to investigate the relatively straightforward question of whether the tempo of diversification (speciation and extinction) differs between two or more phylogenetic trees, without attempting to attribute a causal basis to this difference. It is a likelihood method, and I demonstrate that it generally shows type I error that is close to the nominal level. I also demonstrate that parameter estimates obtained with this approach are largely unbiased. As this method can be used to compare trees of unknown relationship, it will be particularly well-suited to problems in which a difference in diversification rate between clades is suspected, but in which these clades are not particularly closely related. As diversification methods can easily take into account an incomplete sampling fraction, but missing lineages are assumed to be missing at random, this method is also appropriate for cases in which we have hypothesized a difference in the process of diversification between two or more focal clades, but in which many unsampled groups separate the few of interest. The method of this study is by no means an attempt to replace more sophisticated models in which, for instance, diversification depends on the state of an observed or unobserved discrete or continuous trait. Rather, my intention is to provide a complementary approach for circumstances in which a simpler hypothesis is warranted and of biological interest. © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.application/pdf10.1002/ece3.40302045-7758https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20309eng53125303Ecology and EvolutionVol. 8Ecology and Evolution, ISSN:2045-7758, Vol. 8 (2018) pp. 5303-5312https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.4030Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Alfaro, M.E., Santini, F., Brock, C., Alamillo, H., Dornburg, A., Rabosky, D.L., Harmon, L.J., Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates (2009) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, pp. 13410-13414. , https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811087106instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURComparative MethodsMaximum LikelihoodPhylogenyPlantas leñosas715600Diversidad de cultivosMétodos comparativosFilogenia (Botánica)Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic treesarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Revell, Liam JRevell, Liam JORIGINAL44.pdfapplication/pdf531601https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/4c4ddada-ce20-468a-a862-7acd3c16b8b4/downloada8b73f22aa02744c99d35209413eeb2eMD51TEXT44.pdf.txt44.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain53742https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1d3c4493-5d9a-43ca-ad80-49cea7417c61/downloadee6f03a40b57d9d80a3c111e6088c729MD52THUMBNAIL44.pdf.jpg44.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4098https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/91a2a770-2166-4dbb-9c54-4749ec33db73/download488abb92211b554d800211c1e9baac69MD5310336/20309oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/203092020-02-12 16:21:19.436https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees |
title |
Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees |
spellingShingle |
Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees Comparative Methods Maximum Likelihood Phylogeny Plantas leñosas Diversidad de cultivos Métodos comparativos Filogenia (Botánica) |
title_short |
Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees |
title_full |
Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees |
title_fullStr |
Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees |
title_sort |
Comparing the rates of speciation and extinction between phylogenetic trees |
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Comparative Methods Maximum Likelihood Phylogeny |
topic |
Comparative Methods Maximum Likelihood Phylogeny Plantas leñosas Diversidad de cultivos Métodos comparativos Filogenia (Botánica) |
dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
Plantas leñosas |
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv |
Diversidad de cultivos Métodos comparativos Filogenia (Botánica) |
description |
Over the past decade or so it has become increasingly popular to use reconstructed evolutionary trees to investigate questions about the rates of speciation and extinction. Although the methodology of this field has grown substantially in its sophistication in recent years, here I will take a step back to present a very simple model that is designed to investigate the relatively straightforward question of whether the tempo of diversification (speciation and extinction) differs between two or more phylogenetic trees, without attempting to attribute a causal basis to this difference. It is a likelihood method, and I demonstrate that it generally shows type I error that is close to the nominal level. I also demonstrate that parameter estimates obtained with this approach are largely unbiased. As this method can be used to compare trees of unknown relationship, it will be particularly well-suited to problems in which a difference in diversification rate between clades is suspected, but in which these clades are not particularly closely related. As diversification methods can easily take into account an incomplete sampling fraction, but missing lineages are assumed to be missing at random, this method is also appropriate for cases in which we have hypothesized a difference in the process of diversification between two or more focal clades, but in which many unsampled groups separate the few of interest. The method of this study is by no means an attempt to replace more sophisticated models in which, for instance, diversification depends on the state of an observed or unobserved discrete or continuous trait. Rather, my intention is to provide a complementary approach for circumstances in which a simpler hypothesis is warranted and of biological interest. © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-23T12:54:26Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-23T12:54:26Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1002/ece3.4030 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2045-7758 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20309 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1002/ece3.4030 2045-7758 |
url |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20309 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
5312 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
5303 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecology and Evolution |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 8 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ecology and Evolution, ISSN:2045-7758, Vol. 8 (2018) pp. 5303-5312 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.4030 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Alfaro, M.E., Santini, F., Brock, C., Alamillo, H., Dornburg, A., Rabosky, D.L., Harmon, L.J., Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates (2009) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, pp. 13410-13414. , https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811087106 |
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/4c4ddada-ce20-468a-a862-7acd3c16b8b4/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1d3c4493-5d9a-43ca-ad80-49cea7417c61/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/91a2a770-2166-4dbb-9c54-4749ec33db73/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
a8b73f22aa02744c99d35209413eeb2e ee6f03a40b57d9d80a3c111e6088c729 488abb92211b554d800211c1e9baac69 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167549074472960 |