International relations in the prison of colonial modernity

This article argues that Justin Rosenberg’s proposal to reground IR in an ontology of societal multiplicity fails to account for the practices by which the field has erased multiplicity from its register and has sustained its identity through suppression of difference. We posit that the prison of co...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22171
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117817691349
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22171
Palabra clave:
Colonialism
Development
Difference
Modernity
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_b9bf65c20adb017808b911a45ae9588c
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22171
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling eca83127-a0e2-4679-ab34-17db1274cde710101699286002020-05-25T23:55:40Z2020-05-25T23:55:40Z2017This article argues that Justin Rosenberg’s proposal to reground IR in an ontology of societal multiplicity fails to account for the practices by which the field has erased multiplicity from its register and has sustained its identity through suppression of difference. We posit that the prison of colonial modernity, more than that of Political Science, is at the root of IR’s lack of a distinctive purpose, and that Rosenberg’s gesture toward uneven and combined development (UCD) as a sorely needed ‘big idea’ is insufficient for the jail break. © The Author(s) 2017.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00471178176913491741286200471178https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22171engSAGE Publications Ltd75No. 171International RelationsVol. 31International Relations, ISSN:17412862, 00471178, Vol.31, No.1 (2017); pp. 71-75https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85018302872&doi=10.1177%2f0047117817691349&partnerID=40&md5=4e503b35789c48084d67f4905661f742Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURColonialismDevelopmentDifferenceModernityInternational relations in the prison of colonial modernityarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Blaney D.L.Tickner, Arlene Beth10336/22171oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/221712022-05-02 07:37:17.410355https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv International relations in the prison of colonial modernity
title International relations in the prison of colonial modernity
spellingShingle International relations in the prison of colonial modernity
Colonialism
Development
Difference
Modernity
title_short International relations in the prison of colonial modernity
title_full International relations in the prison of colonial modernity
title_fullStr International relations in the prison of colonial modernity
title_full_unstemmed International relations in the prison of colonial modernity
title_sort International relations in the prison of colonial modernity
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Colonialism
Development
Difference
Modernity
topic Colonialism
Development
Difference
Modernity
description This article argues that Justin Rosenberg’s proposal to reground IR in an ontology of societal multiplicity fails to account for the practices by which the field has erased multiplicity from its register and has sustained its identity through suppression of difference. We posit that the prison of colonial modernity, more than that of Political Science, is at the root of IR’s lack of a distinctive purpose, and that Rosenberg’s gesture toward uneven and combined development (UCD) as a sorely needed ‘big idea’ is insufficient for the jail break. © The Author(s) 2017.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:55:40Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:55:40Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117817691349
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 17412862
00471178
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22171
url https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117817691349
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22171
identifier_str_mv 17412862
00471178
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 75
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 71
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv International Relations
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 31
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv International Relations, ISSN:17412862, 00471178, Vol.31, No.1 (2017); pp. 71-75
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85018302872&doi=10.1177%2f0047117817691349&partnerID=40&md5=4e503b35789c48084d67f4905661f742
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications Ltd
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167424977600512

Publicaciones similares