The role of the AR/ER ratio in ER-positive breast cancer patients

The significance of androgen receptor (AR) in breast cancer (BC) management is not fully defined, and it is still ambiguous how the level of AR expression influences oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumours. The aim of the present study was to analyse the prognostic impact of AR/ER ratio, evaluated...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23923
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-17-0417
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23923
Palabra clave:
Androgen receptor
Epidermal growth factor receptor 2
Estrogen receptor
Ki 67 antigen
Progesterone receptor
Tumor marker
Androgen receptor
Estrogen receptor
Adult
Aged
Article
Cancer grading
Cancer patient
Cancer prognosis
Cancer recurrence
Cancer survival
Cohort analysis
Controlled study
Disease free interval
Disease specific survival
Estrogen receptor positive breast cancer
Female
Histopathology
Human
Human tissue
Immunohistochemistry
Luminal a breast cancer
Luminal b breast cancer
Lymph node metastasis
Major clinical study
Mastectomy
Partial mastectomy
Recurrence risk
Retrospective study
Survival rate
Tumor volume
Breast tumor
Metabolism
Middle aged
Pathology
Prognosis
Very elderly
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast neoplasms
Female
Humans
Middle aged
Prognosis
Androgen receptor
Breast cancer
Oestrogen receptor
Prosigna
Subtypes
androgen
human
estrogen
Ar protein
Receptors
Receptors
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:The significance of androgen receptor (AR) in breast cancer (BC) management is not fully defined, and it is still ambiguous how the level of AR expression influences oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumours. The aim of the present study was to analyse the prognostic impact of AR/ER ratio, evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC), correlating this value with clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics. We retrospectively selected a cohort of 402 ER+BC patients. On each tumour, IHC analyses for AR, ER, PgR, HER2 and Ki67 were performed and AR+ cases were used to calculate the AR/ER value. A cut-off of >2 was selected using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. RNA from 19 cases with AR/ER>2 was extracted and used for Prosigna-PAM50 assays. Tumours with AR/ER>2 (6%) showed more frequent metastatic lymph nodes, larger size, higher histological grade and lower PgR levels than cases with AR/ER less than 2. Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients with AR/ER>2 had worse disease-free interval (DFI) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (hazard ratios (HR) = 4.96 for DFI and HR = 8.69 for DSS, both P less than 0.004). According to the Prosigna-PAM50 assay, 63% (12/19) of these cases resulted in intermediate or high risk of recurrence categories. Additionally, although all samples were positive for ER assessed by IHC, the molecular test assigned 47.4% (9/19) of BCs to intrinsic non-luminal subtypes. In conclusion, the AR/ER ratio >2 identifies a subgroup of patients with aggressive biological features and may represent an additional independent marker of worse BC prognosis. Moreover, the Prosigna-PAM50 results indicate that a significant number of cases with AR/ER>2 could be non-luminal tumours. © 2018 Society for Endocrinology Printed in Great Britain Published by Bioscientifica Ltd.