Sustainable development: Paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning organizations

Purpose: Sustainability is, in itself, the idea of a harmonic answer to the dual nature of the most pressing problem for global society. Most of the problems dealing with sustainability concern its dual and contradictory nature. That paradoxical reality is in no way a unique feature of sustainabilit...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2012
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22514
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471211190365
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22514
Palabra clave:
Complexity
Managerial cybernetics
Organizational learning
Organizations
Paradoxes
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_a9d62f32f32c1a2bd23ab6b3d699cdcf
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22514
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 460320e4-af23-46b5-805d-bd273ef5d2e3-12020-05-25T23:56:46Z2020-05-25T23:56:46Z2012Purpose: Sustainability is, in itself, the idea of a harmonic answer to the dual nature of the most pressing problem for global society. Most of the problems dealing with sustainability concern its dual and contradictory nature. That paradoxical reality is in no way a unique feature of sustainability; its universal pervasiveness is demonstrated by the attention that Western and Eastern philosophies have given to it. This paper seeks to describe paradoxes that arise in managerial and organizational learning processes and proposes a taxonomy. It pays special attention to the central paradox of 'complexifying' and to reductionism-holism in science. Design/methodology/approach: The work is based on the theories of organizational learning and managerial cybernetics, under the paradox view of management. Findings: The study shows the relevance of the paradox view to management understanding of the complexity of sustainability, its controversial nature; and how the latter relates to epistemology and to the complementarity of analytical and synthetics methods in research and science. It also demonstrates that, at organizational levels, harnessing tensions that emerge from natural paradoxical situations enhances sustainable oriented decision-making. Research limitations/implications: The paper builds a bridge toward scientific communities that, working on sustainability and/or complexity, are unaware of the important contribution of cybernetics, especially Ashby's work and the VSM's relevance to the examination of complex societal issues. Practical implications: The paper provides a platform to enquire on the implications of societal learning on sustainability, and on de facto global digital networks emerging from over ideologized constituents that, in the name of the greenness of the environment and of a just society, fail to see how rapidly global society is positively changing after the dark years of the Cold War. Originality/value: The paper reviews current developments on the paradox view of management, and proposes a taxonomy of paradoxes based on managerial cybernetics and organizational learning. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1108/096964712111903659696474https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22514eng76No. 158Learning OrganizationVol. 19Learning Organization, ISSN:9696474, Vol.19, No.1 (2012); pp. 58-76https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-83455177820&doi=10.1108%2f09696471211190365&partnerID=40&md5=968a0c5e40dd8d241c4f0758bc43bd64Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURComplexityManagerial cyberneticsOrganizational learningOrganizationsParadoxesSustainabilitySustainable developmentSustainable development: Paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning organizationsarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Ramirez, Gabriel A.10336/22514oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/225142022-05-02 07:37:19.324221https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Sustainable development: Paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning organizations
title Sustainable development: Paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning organizations
spellingShingle Sustainable development: Paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning organizations
Complexity
Managerial cybernetics
Organizational learning
Organizations
Paradoxes
Sustainability
Sustainable development
title_short Sustainable development: Paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning organizations
title_full Sustainable development: Paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning organizations
title_fullStr Sustainable development: Paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning organizations
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable development: Paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning organizations
title_sort Sustainable development: Paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning organizations
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Complexity
Managerial cybernetics
Organizational learning
Organizations
Paradoxes
Sustainability
Sustainable development
topic Complexity
Managerial cybernetics
Organizational learning
Organizations
Paradoxes
Sustainability
Sustainable development
description Purpose: Sustainability is, in itself, the idea of a harmonic answer to the dual nature of the most pressing problem for global society. Most of the problems dealing with sustainability concern its dual and contradictory nature. That paradoxical reality is in no way a unique feature of sustainability; its universal pervasiveness is demonstrated by the attention that Western and Eastern philosophies have given to it. This paper seeks to describe paradoxes that arise in managerial and organizational learning processes and proposes a taxonomy. It pays special attention to the central paradox of 'complexifying' and to reductionism-holism in science. Design/methodology/approach: The work is based on the theories of organizational learning and managerial cybernetics, under the paradox view of management. Findings: The study shows the relevance of the paradox view to management understanding of the complexity of sustainability, its controversial nature; and how the latter relates to epistemology and to the complementarity of analytical and synthetics methods in research and science. It also demonstrates that, at organizational levels, harnessing tensions that emerge from natural paradoxical situations enhances sustainable oriented decision-making. Research limitations/implications: The paper builds a bridge toward scientific communities that, working on sustainability and/or complexity, are unaware of the important contribution of cybernetics, especially Ashby's work and the VSM's relevance to the examination of complex societal issues. Practical implications: The paper provides a platform to enquire on the implications of societal learning on sustainability, and on de facto global digital networks emerging from over ideologized constituents that, in the name of the greenness of the environment and of a just society, fail to see how rapidly global society is positively changing after the dark years of the Cold War. Originality/value: The paper reviews current developments on the paradox view of management, and proposes a taxonomy of paradoxes based on managerial cybernetics and organizational learning. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2012
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:56:46Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:56:46Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471211190365
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 9696474
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22514
url https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471211190365
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22514
identifier_str_mv 9696474
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 76
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 58
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Learning Organization
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 19
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Learning Organization, ISSN:9696474, Vol.19, No.1 (2012); pp. 58-76
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-83455177820&doi=10.1108%2f09696471211190365&partnerID=40&md5=968a0c5e40dd8d241c4f0758bc43bd64
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390856309211136