Effects of Procedural Variations in the Training of Negative Relations for the Emergence of Equivalence Relations

This study aimed to determine whether the exclusive positive conditional relations established by the matching-to-sample (MTS) procedure are sufficient for equivalence class formation, or whether the negative conditional relations established with stimuli of alternative classes are necessary for it....

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22905
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0157-9
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22905
Palabra clave:
Conditional discrimination
Humans
Matching-to-sample
Stimulus control
Stimulus equivalence
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_a53c30269a6ac766294aa807e4981975
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22905
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 978a0808-0872-45ea-a66a-03f55773b3ea-153e437b1-9c38-4457-8209-0db0ccce9de2-12020-05-25T23:58:39Z2020-05-25T23:58:39Z2016This study aimed to determine whether the exclusive positive conditional relations established by the matching-to-sample (MTS) procedure are sufficient for equivalence class formation, or whether the negative conditional relations established with stimuli of alternative classes are necessary for it. In Experiment 1, two 3-choice MTS procedures were compared regarding equivalence class formation. The standard MTS procedure, where negative relations among stimuli of alternative classes are trained, was compared to an altered MTS procedure, where negative relations with stimuli that were not positive to any sample were trained. In Experiment 2, the positive and negative control patterns established by the standard and altered MTS procedures were assessed. Experiment 3 compared 2 further variations: (a) training only 1 negative relation with stimuli of alternative classes in each training trial type (semi-standard MTS procedure) or (b) varying the negative stimuli that did not belong to any class (varied-altered MTS procedure). The overall results indicate that for participants demonstrating high positive conditional baseline relations and high negative relations to stimuli from alternative classes, the probability of equivalence class formation was high, but when participants showed only high positive conditional baseline relations, the probability of equivalence class formation was very low. All main theories of equivalence class formation have difficulty accounting for these results, and an account based on a learning history of classifying behavior is offered. © 2015, Association for Behavior Analysis International.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0157-9332933https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22905engSpringer International Publishing125No. 1109Psychological RecordVol. 66Psychological Record, ISSN:332933, Vol.66, No.1 (2016); pp. 109-125https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84957553201&doi=10.1007%2fs40732-015-0157-9&partnerID=40&md5=69d1e2a0b39ace3ff806731a47bbfc3dAbierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURConditional discriminationHumansMatching-to-sampleStimulus controlStimulus equivalenceEffects of Procedural Variations in the Training of Negative Relations for the Emergence of Equivalence RelationsarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Plazas, Elberto AntonioPeña, Telmo EduardoORIGINALPlazas-Pena2016_Article_EffectsOfProceduralVariationsI.pdfapplication/pdf3073436https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/c2c87e9d-a019-477a-8ead-7de863cb5421/download881803c33dec76db5fe1d11202d8222eMD51TEXTPlazas-Pena2016_Article_EffectsOfProceduralVariationsI.pdf.txtPlazas-Pena2016_Article_EffectsOfProceduralVariationsI.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain87080https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1354b612-9c1d-4abc-9e96-b739da04dfef/download7b8cb1c820641f63e213f2c386f0c66aMD52THUMBNAILPlazas-Pena2016_Article_EffectsOfProceduralVariationsI.pdf.jpgPlazas-Pena2016_Article_EffectsOfProceduralVariationsI.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4480https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7527fa70-acf5-4502-8a65-8b31bb9cb87a/download6a4d9bc981e8fa862d1d7bd3db01082cMD5310336/22905oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/229052022-05-02 07:37:14.407846https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Effects of Procedural Variations in the Training of Negative Relations for the Emergence of Equivalence Relations
title Effects of Procedural Variations in the Training of Negative Relations for the Emergence of Equivalence Relations
spellingShingle Effects of Procedural Variations in the Training of Negative Relations for the Emergence of Equivalence Relations
Conditional discrimination
Humans
Matching-to-sample
Stimulus control
Stimulus equivalence
title_short Effects of Procedural Variations in the Training of Negative Relations for the Emergence of Equivalence Relations
title_full Effects of Procedural Variations in the Training of Negative Relations for the Emergence of Equivalence Relations
title_fullStr Effects of Procedural Variations in the Training of Negative Relations for the Emergence of Equivalence Relations
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Procedural Variations in the Training of Negative Relations for the Emergence of Equivalence Relations
title_sort Effects of Procedural Variations in the Training of Negative Relations for the Emergence of Equivalence Relations
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Conditional discrimination
Humans
Matching-to-sample
Stimulus control
Stimulus equivalence
topic Conditional discrimination
Humans
Matching-to-sample
Stimulus control
Stimulus equivalence
description This study aimed to determine whether the exclusive positive conditional relations established by the matching-to-sample (MTS) procedure are sufficient for equivalence class formation, or whether the negative conditional relations established with stimuli of alternative classes are necessary for it. In Experiment 1, two 3-choice MTS procedures were compared regarding equivalence class formation. The standard MTS procedure, where negative relations among stimuli of alternative classes are trained, was compared to an altered MTS procedure, where negative relations with stimuli that were not positive to any sample were trained. In Experiment 2, the positive and negative control patterns established by the standard and altered MTS procedures were assessed. Experiment 3 compared 2 further variations: (a) training only 1 negative relation with stimuli of alternative classes in each training trial type (semi-standard MTS procedure) or (b) varying the negative stimuli that did not belong to any class (varied-altered MTS procedure). The overall results indicate that for participants demonstrating high positive conditional baseline relations and high negative relations to stimuli from alternative classes, the probability of equivalence class formation was high, but when participants showed only high positive conditional baseline relations, the probability of equivalence class formation was very low. All main theories of equivalence class formation have difficulty accounting for these results, and an account based on a learning history of classifying behavior is offered. © 2015, Association for Behavior Analysis International.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:58:39Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-25T23:58:39Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0157-9
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 332933
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22905
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0157-9
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22905
identifier_str_mv 332933
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 125
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 109
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Psychological Record
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 66
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Psychological Record, ISSN:332933, Vol.66, No.1 (2016); pp. 109-125
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84957553201&doi=10.1007%2fs40732-015-0157-9&partnerID=40&md5=69d1e2a0b39ace3ff806731a47bbfc3d
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Springer International Publishing
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/c2c87e9d-a019-477a-8ead-7de863cb5421/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/1354b612-9c1d-4abc-9e96-b739da04dfef/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/7527fa70-acf5-4502-8a65-8b31bb9cb87a/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 881803c33dec76db5fe1d11202d8222e
7b8cb1c820641f63e213f2c386f0c66a
6a4d9bc981e8fa862d1d7bd3db01082c
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390861669531648