Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study

In the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm, participants falsely recall or recognize a nonpresented word (critical lure), highly associated with previously studied words. As numerous DRM studies have found a robust false memory effect at the behavioural level, event-related potentials (ERPs) stu...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2013
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/28137
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c93e3
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28137
Palabra clave:
DRM paradigm
Event-related potentials
False recognition
Memory illusion
Modality-match effect
Rights
License
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
id EDOCUR2_a3dcd6e7a251556c2ed479beadcc1f90
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/28137
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling 5923ad0f-6d5a-4fc2-9f7a-818e200d206c-14e0fdd8c-800e-4e4a-9e78-02d4d294a9cb-111263980066002020-08-19T14:46:01Z2020-08-19T14:46:01Z2013-02-13In the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm, participants falsely recall or recognize a nonpresented word (critical lure), highly associated with previously studied words. As numerous DRM studies have found a robust false memory effect at the behavioural level, event-related potentials (ERPs) studies have searched for possible overlapping in brain electrical activity between true and false memory. Using the DRM paradigm, the present experiment manipulated the sensory modality of stimulus presentation (auditory vs. visual) in the study phase to analyse the effect of modality match between study and test on true and false recognition. Words were therefore presented either visually or auditorily at study and always visually at test. True recognition was found to be significantly higher in the modality ‘match’ condition (visual–visual) than in the ‘mismatch’ condition (auditory–visual), whereas there was no modality-match effect on false recognition of critical lures. A general, overlapping was found between ERP correlates of true and false recognition: FN400 (300–500 ms), left-parietal (400–800 ms) and late right-frontal (1000–1500 ms) old/new effects were similar for both studied words and critical lures. No sensory modality-match effect was associated with FN400 or left-parietal old/new effects. Only the late right-frontal activity was modulated by modality manipulation, with significantly more positive ERPs in the modality-match condition. Sensory modality match of stimulus presentation, therefore, dissociated true and false recognition memory only at the behavioural level but not at the ERP level. Overall, true and false recognition memories seem to share common underlying processes.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c93e3ISSN: 0959-4965EISSN: 1473-558Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28137engLippincott Williams & Wilkins113No. 3108NeuroReportVol. 24NeuroReport, ISSN: 0959-4965;EISSN: 1473-558X, Vol.24, No.3 (February 2013); pp. 108-113https://journals.lww.com/neuroreport/Abstract/2013/02130/Modality_match_effect_in_false_recognition___an.2.aspxRestringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecNeuroReportinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURDRM paradigmEvent-related potentialsFalse recognitionMemory illusionModality-match effectModality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential studyEfecto de coincidencia de modalidad en el reconocimiento falso: un estudio potencial relacionado con un eventoarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Boldini, AngelaBeato, Maria SoledadCadavid Espinha, Sara10336/28137oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/281372021-06-03 00:51:12.545https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv Efecto de coincidencia de modalidad en el reconocimiento falso: un estudio potencial relacionado con un evento
title Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study
spellingShingle Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study
DRM paradigm
Event-related potentials
False recognition
Memory illusion
Modality-match effect
title_short Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study
title_full Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study
title_fullStr Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study
title_full_unstemmed Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study
title_sort Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv DRM paradigm
Event-related potentials
False recognition
Memory illusion
Modality-match effect
topic DRM paradigm
Event-related potentials
False recognition
Memory illusion
Modality-match effect
description In the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm, participants falsely recall or recognize a nonpresented word (critical lure), highly associated with previously studied words. As numerous DRM studies have found a robust false memory effect at the behavioural level, event-related potentials (ERPs) studies have searched for possible overlapping in brain electrical activity between true and false memory. Using the DRM paradigm, the present experiment manipulated the sensory modality of stimulus presentation (auditory vs. visual) in the study phase to analyse the effect of modality match between study and test on true and false recognition. Words were therefore presented either visually or auditorily at study and always visually at test. True recognition was found to be significantly higher in the modality ‘match’ condition (visual–visual) than in the ‘mismatch’ condition (auditory–visual), whereas there was no modality-match effect on false recognition of critical lures. A general, overlapping was found between ERP correlates of true and false recognition: FN400 (300–500 ms), left-parietal (400–800 ms) and late right-frontal (1000–1500 ms) old/new effects were similar for both studied words and critical lures. No sensory modality-match effect was associated with FN400 or left-parietal old/new effects. Only the late right-frontal activity was modulated by modality manipulation, with significantly more positive ERPs in the modality-match condition. Sensory modality match of stimulus presentation, therefore, dissociated true and false recognition memory only at the behavioural level but not at the ERP level. Overall, true and false recognition memories seem to share common underlying processes.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2013-02-13
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-19T14:46:01Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-19T14:46:01Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c93e3
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv ISSN: 0959-4965
EISSN: 1473-558X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28137
url https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c93e3
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28137
identifier_str_mv ISSN: 0959-4965
EISSN: 1473-558X
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 113
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 3
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 108
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv NeuroReport
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 24
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv NeuroReport, ISSN: 0959-4965;EISSN: 1473-558X, Vol.24, No.3 (February 2013); pp. 108-113
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://journals.lww.com/neuroreport/Abstract/2013/02130/Modality_match_effect_in_false_recognition___an.2.aspx
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
rights_invalid_str_mv Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv NeuroReport
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1808390853434015744