Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study
In the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm, participants falsely recall or recognize a nonpresented word (critical lure), highly associated with previously studied words. As numerous DRM studies have found a robust false memory effect at the behavioural level, event-related potentials (ERPs) stu...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/28137
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c93e3
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28137
- Palabra clave:
- DRM paradigm
Event-related potentials
False recognition
Memory illusion
Modality-match effect
- Rights
- License
- Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
id |
EDOCUR2_a3dcd6e7a251556c2ed479beadcc1f90 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/28137 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
5923ad0f-6d5a-4fc2-9f7a-818e200d206c-14e0fdd8c-800e-4e4a-9e78-02d4d294a9cb-111263980066002020-08-19T14:46:01Z2020-08-19T14:46:01Z2013-02-13In the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm, participants falsely recall or recognize a nonpresented word (critical lure), highly associated with previously studied words. As numerous DRM studies have found a robust false memory effect at the behavioural level, event-related potentials (ERPs) studies have searched for possible overlapping in brain electrical activity between true and false memory. Using the DRM paradigm, the present experiment manipulated the sensory modality of stimulus presentation (auditory vs. visual) in the study phase to analyse the effect of modality match between study and test on true and false recognition. Words were therefore presented either visually or auditorily at study and always visually at test. True recognition was found to be significantly higher in the modality ‘match’ condition (visual–visual) than in the ‘mismatch’ condition (auditory–visual), whereas there was no modality-match effect on false recognition of critical lures. A general, overlapping was found between ERP correlates of true and false recognition: FN400 (300–500 ms), left-parietal (400–800 ms) and late right-frontal (1000–1500 ms) old/new effects were similar for both studied words and critical lures. No sensory modality-match effect was associated with FN400 or left-parietal old/new effects. Only the late right-frontal activity was modulated by modality manipulation, with significantly more positive ERPs in the modality-match condition. Sensory modality match of stimulus presentation, therefore, dissociated true and false recognition memory only at the behavioural level but not at the ERP level. Overall, true and false recognition memories seem to share common underlying processes.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c93e3ISSN: 0959-4965EISSN: 1473-558Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28137engLippincott Williams & Wilkins113No. 3108NeuroReportVol. 24NeuroReport, ISSN: 0959-4965;EISSN: 1473-558X, Vol.24, No.3 (February 2013); pp. 108-113https://journals.lww.com/neuroreport/Abstract/2013/02130/Modality_match_effect_in_false_recognition___an.2.aspxRestringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecNeuroReportinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURDRM paradigmEvent-related potentialsFalse recognitionMemory illusionModality-match effectModality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential studyEfecto de coincidencia de modalidad en el reconocimiento falso: un estudio potencial relacionado con un eventoarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Boldini, AngelaBeato, Maria SoledadCadavid Espinha, Sara10336/28137oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/281372021-06-03 00:51:12.545https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study |
dc.title.TranslatedTitle.spa.fl_str_mv |
Efecto de coincidencia de modalidad en el reconocimiento falso: un estudio potencial relacionado con un evento |
title |
Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study |
spellingShingle |
Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study DRM paradigm Event-related potentials False recognition Memory illusion Modality-match effect |
title_short |
Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study |
title_full |
Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study |
title_fullStr |
Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study |
title_sort |
Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
DRM paradigm Event-related potentials False recognition Memory illusion Modality-match effect |
topic |
DRM paradigm Event-related potentials False recognition Memory illusion Modality-match effect |
description |
In the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm, participants falsely recall or recognize a nonpresented word (critical lure), highly associated with previously studied words. As numerous DRM studies have found a robust false memory effect at the behavioural level, event-related potentials (ERPs) studies have searched for possible overlapping in brain electrical activity between true and false memory. Using the DRM paradigm, the present experiment manipulated the sensory modality of stimulus presentation (auditory vs. visual) in the study phase to analyse the effect of modality match between study and test on true and false recognition. Words were therefore presented either visually or auditorily at study and always visually at test. True recognition was found to be significantly higher in the modality ‘match’ condition (visual–visual) than in the ‘mismatch’ condition (auditory–visual), whereas there was no modality-match effect on false recognition of critical lures. A general, overlapping was found between ERP correlates of true and false recognition: FN400 (300–500 ms), left-parietal (400–800 ms) and late right-frontal (1000–1500 ms) old/new effects were similar for both studied words and critical lures. No sensory modality-match effect was associated with FN400 or left-parietal old/new effects. Only the late right-frontal activity was modulated by modality manipulation, with significantly more positive ERPs in the modality-match condition. Sensory modality match of stimulus presentation, therefore, dissociated true and false recognition memory only at the behavioural level but not at the ERP level. Overall, true and false recognition memories seem to share common underlying processes. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2013-02-13 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-19T14:46:01Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-19T14:46:01Z |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c93e3 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
ISSN: 0959-4965 EISSN: 1473-558X |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28137 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c93e3 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/28137 |
identifier_str_mv |
ISSN: 0959-4965 EISSN: 1473-558X |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv |
113 |
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv |
No. 3 |
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv |
108 |
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv |
NeuroReport |
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv |
Vol. 24 |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
NeuroReport, ISSN: 0959-4965;EISSN: 1473-558X, Vol.24, No.3 (February 2013); pp. 108-113 |
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://journals.lww.com/neuroreport/Abstract/2013/02130/Modality_match_effect_in_false_recognition___an.2.aspx |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos) |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Restringido (Acceso a grupos específicos) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
NeuroReport |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814167574490906624 |