Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America

Objective: To analyze the level of knowledge and use, and the characteristics of use, of care coordination mechanisms in public healthcare networks of six Latin America countries. Method: Cross-sectional study based on a survey using the COORDENA® questionnaire with primary and secondary care doctor...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24112
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.009
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24112
Palabra clave:
Argentina
Article
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Coordination
Cross-sectional study
Diffusion
E-mail
General practitioner
Human
Human experiment
Joint
Mexico
Patient referral
Practice guideline
Primary health care
Questionnaire
Secondary health care
Uruguay
Clinical coordination
Clinical coordination mechanisms
Integrated health care
Latin America
Primary health care
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id EDOCUR2_9e95ecf6f21142a35a3b788406bdbc31
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24112
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin AmericaConocimiento y uso de mecanismos de coordinación clínica de servicios de salud de LatinoaméricaArgentinaArticleBrazilChileColombiaCoordinationCross-sectional studyDiffusionE-mailGeneral practitionerHumanHuman experimentJointMexicoPatient referralPractice guidelinePrimary health careQuestionnaireSecondary health careUruguayClinical coordinationClinical coordination mechanismsIntegrated health careLatin AmericaPrimary health careObjective: To analyze the level of knowledge and use, and the characteristics of use, of care coordination mechanisms in public healthcare networks of six Latin America countries. Method: Cross-sectional study based on a survey using the COORDENA® questionnaire with primary and secondary care doctors (348 doctors/country) of public healthcare networks in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay (May-October 2015). Analyzed variables: degree of knowledge and use of information coordination (referral/reply letter, discharge report, phone, e-mail) and of clinical management coordination (shared clinical guidelines, joint meetings) mechanisms. Descriptive analyses were conducted. Results: Knowledge of clinical information coordination mechanisms was high in both care levels and analyzed networks as was the use of referral/reply letter. There was greater variability in the use of discharge reports (from 40.0% in Brazil to 79.4% in Mexico) and, except for Argentina, a low reception reported by primary care doctors stands out (12.3% in Colombia and 55.1% in Uruguay). In contrast, knowledge of clinical management coordination mechanisms was limited, especially among secondary care doctors. It is noteworthy, however, that adherence to clinical guidelines was high (from 83.1% in Mexico to 96.8% in Brazil), while participation in joint meetings varied widely (from 23.7% in Chile to 76.2% in Brazil). The difficulties reported in the use of the mechanisms are related to structural and organizational factors. Conclusions: The limited knowledge and use of coordination mechanisms shows insufficient diffusion and implementation. Strategies to increase its use are needed, including the related factors. © 2018 SESPASEdiciones Doyma, S.L.20182020-05-26T00:08:46Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/contributionToPeriodicalhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3e5aapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.0092139111https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24112instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURenghttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85058544111&doi=10.1016%2fj.gaceta.2018.09.009&partnerID=40&md5=a5ce706fc5eb402cd2c7e939f7b8dcd7http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Miranda-Mendizábal, AndreaVargas, IngridMogollón Pérez, Amparo SusanaEguiguren, PamelaSamico, IsabellaLópez, JulietaBertolotto, FernandoAmarilla, DeliaVázquez, María-Luisaoai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/241122022-05-02T07:37:16Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America
Conocimiento y uso de mecanismos de coordinación clínica de servicios de salud de Latinoamérica
title Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America
spellingShingle Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America
Argentina
Article
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Coordination
Cross-sectional study
Diffusion
E-mail
General practitioner
Human
Human experiment
Joint
Mexico
Patient referral
Practice guideline
Primary health care
Questionnaire
Secondary health care
Uruguay
Clinical coordination
Clinical coordination mechanisms
Integrated health care
Latin America
Primary health care
title_short Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America
title_full Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America
title_fullStr Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America
title_sort Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Argentina
Article
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Coordination
Cross-sectional study
Diffusion
E-mail
General practitioner
Human
Human experiment
Joint
Mexico
Patient referral
Practice guideline
Primary health care
Questionnaire
Secondary health care
Uruguay
Clinical coordination
Clinical coordination mechanisms
Integrated health care
Latin America
Primary health care
topic Argentina
Article
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Coordination
Cross-sectional study
Diffusion
E-mail
General practitioner
Human
Human experiment
Joint
Mexico
Patient referral
Practice guideline
Primary health care
Questionnaire
Secondary health care
Uruguay
Clinical coordination
Clinical coordination mechanisms
Integrated health care
Latin America
Primary health care
description Objective: To analyze the level of knowledge and use, and the characteristics of use, of care coordination mechanisms in public healthcare networks of six Latin America countries. Method: Cross-sectional study based on a survey using the COORDENA® questionnaire with primary and secondary care doctors (348 doctors/country) of public healthcare networks in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay (May-October 2015). Analyzed variables: degree of knowledge and use of information coordination (referral/reply letter, discharge report, phone, e-mail) and of clinical management coordination (shared clinical guidelines, joint meetings) mechanisms. Descriptive analyses were conducted. Results: Knowledge of clinical information coordination mechanisms was high in both care levels and analyzed networks as was the use of referral/reply letter. There was greater variability in the use of discharge reports (from 40.0% in Brazil to 79.4% in Mexico) and, except for Argentina, a low reception reported by primary care doctors stands out (12.3% in Colombia and 55.1% in Uruguay). In contrast, knowledge of clinical management coordination mechanisms was limited, especially among secondary care doctors. It is noteworthy, however, that adherence to clinical guidelines was high (from 83.1% in Mexico to 96.8% in Brazil), while participation in joint meetings varied widely (from 23.7% in Chile to 76.2% in Brazil). The difficulties reported in the use of the mechanisms are related to structural and organizational factors. Conclusions: The limited knowledge and use of coordination mechanisms shows insufficient diffusion and implementation. Strategies to increase its use are needed, including the related factors. © 2018 SESPAS
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2020-05-26T00:08:46Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/contributionToPeriodical
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3e5a
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.009
2139111
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24112
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.009
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24112
identifier_str_mv 2139111
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85058544111&doi=10.1016%2fj.gaceta.2018.09.009&partnerID=40&md5=a5ce706fc5eb402cd2c7e939f7b8dcd7
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ediciones Doyma, S.L.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ediciones Doyma, S.L.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
instname_str Universidad del Rosario
institution Universidad del Rosario
reponame_str Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
collection Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803710422145040385