Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America
Objective: To analyze the level of knowledge and use, and the characteristics of use, of care coordination mechanisms in public healthcare networks of six Latin America countries. Method: Cross-sectional study based on a survey using the COORDENA® questionnaire with primary and secondary care doctor...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24112
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.009
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24112
- Palabra clave:
- Argentina
Article
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Coordination
Cross-sectional study
Diffusion
E-mail
General practitioner
Human
Human experiment
Joint
Mexico
Patient referral
Practice guideline
Primary health care
Questionnaire
Secondary health care
Uruguay
Clinical coordination
Clinical coordination mechanisms
Integrated health care
Latin America
Primary health care
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id |
EDOCUR2_9e95ecf6f21142a35a3b788406bdbc31 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24112 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin AmericaConocimiento y uso de mecanismos de coordinación clínica de servicios de salud de LatinoaméricaArgentinaArticleBrazilChileColombiaCoordinationCross-sectional studyDiffusionE-mailGeneral practitionerHumanHuman experimentJointMexicoPatient referralPractice guidelinePrimary health careQuestionnaireSecondary health careUruguayClinical coordinationClinical coordination mechanismsIntegrated health careLatin AmericaPrimary health careObjective: To analyze the level of knowledge and use, and the characteristics of use, of care coordination mechanisms in public healthcare networks of six Latin America countries. Method: Cross-sectional study based on a survey using the COORDENA® questionnaire with primary and secondary care doctors (348 doctors/country) of public healthcare networks in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay (May-October 2015). Analyzed variables: degree of knowledge and use of information coordination (referral/reply letter, discharge report, phone, e-mail) and of clinical management coordination (shared clinical guidelines, joint meetings) mechanisms. Descriptive analyses were conducted. Results: Knowledge of clinical information coordination mechanisms was high in both care levels and analyzed networks as was the use of referral/reply letter. There was greater variability in the use of discharge reports (from 40.0% in Brazil to 79.4% in Mexico) and, except for Argentina, a low reception reported by primary care doctors stands out (12.3% in Colombia and 55.1% in Uruguay). In contrast, knowledge of clinical management coordination mechanisms was limited, especially among secondary care doctors. It is noteworthy, however, that adherence to clinical guidelines was high (from 83.1% in Mexico to 96.8% in Brazil), while participation in joint meetings varied widely (from 23.7% in Chile to 76.2% in Brazil). The difficulties reported in the use of the mechanisms are related to structural and organizational factors. Conclusions: The limited knowledge and use of coordination mechanisms shows insufficient diffusion and implementation. Strategies to increase its use are needed, including the related factors. © 2018 SESPASEdiciones Doyma, S.L.20182020-05-26T00:08:46Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/contributionToPeriodicalhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3e5aapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.0092139111https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24112instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURenghttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85058544111&doi=10.1016%2fj.gaceta.2018.09.009&partnerID=40&md5=a5ce706fc5eb402cd2c7e939f7b8dcd7http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Miranda-Mendizábal, AndreaVargas, IngridMogollón Pérez, Amparo SusanaEguiguren, PamelaSamico, IsabellaLópez, JulietaBertolotto, FernandoAmarilla, DeliaVázquez, María-Luisaoai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/241122022-05-02T07:37:16Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America Conocimiento y uso de mecanismos de coordinación clínica de servicios de salud de Latinoamérica |
title |
Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America |
spellingShingle |
Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America Argentina Article Brazil Chile Colombia Coordination Cross-sectional study Diffusion General practitioner Human Human experiment Joint Mexico Patient referral Practice guideline Primary health care Questionnaire Secondary health care Uruguay Clinical coordination Clinical coordination mechanisms Integrated health care Latin America Primary health care |
title_short |
Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America |
title_full |
Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America |
title_fullStr |
Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America |
title_full_unstemmed |
Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America |
title_sort |
Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Argentina Article Brazil Chile Colombia Coordination Cross-sectional study Diffusion General practitioner Human Human experiment Joint Mexico Patient referral Practice guideline Primary health care Questionnaire Secondary health care Uruguay Clinical coordination Clinical coordination mechanisms Integrated health care Latin America Primary health care |
topic |
Argentina Article Brazil Chile Colombia Coordination Cross-sectional study Diffusion General practitioner Human Human experiment Joint Mexico Patient referral Practice guideline Primary health care Questionnaire Secondary health care Uruguay Clinical coordination Clinical coordination mechanisms Integrated health care Latin America Primary health care |
description |
Objective: To analyze the level of knowledge and use, and the characteristics of use, of care coordination mechanisms in public healthcare networks of six Latin America countries. Method: Cross-sectional study based on a survey using the COORDENA® questionnaire with primary and secondary care doctors (348 doctors/country) of public healthcare networks in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay (May-October 2015). Analyzed variables: degree of knowledge and use of information coordination (referral/reply letter, discharge report, phone, e-mail) and of clinical management coordination (shared clinical guidelines, joint meetings) mechanisms. Descriptive analyses were conducted. Results: Knowledge of clinical information coordination mechanisms was high in both care levels and analyzed networks as was the use of referral/reply letter. There was greater variability in the use of discharge reports (from 40.0% in Brazil to 79.4% in Mexico) and, except for Argentina, a low reception reported by primary care doctors stands out (12.3% in Colombia and 55.1% in Uruguay). In contrast, knowledge of clinical management coordination mechanisms was limited, especially among secondary care doctors. It is noteworthy, however, that adherence to clinical guidelines was high (from 83.1% in Mexico to 96.8% in Brazil), while participation in joint meetings varied widely (from 23.7% in Chile to 76.2% in Brazil). The difficulties reported in the use of the mechanisms are related to structural and organizational factors. Conclusions: The limited knowledge and use of coordination mechanisms shows insufficient diffusion and implementation. Strategies to increase its use are needed, including the related factors. © 2018 SESPAS |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 2020-05-26T00:08:46Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/contributionToPeriodical |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3e5a |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.009 2139111 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24112 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.009 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24112 |
identifier_str_mv |
2139111 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85058544111&doi=10.1016%2fj.gaceta.2018.09.009&partnerID=40&md5=a5ce706fc5eb402cd2c7e939f7b8dcd7 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ediciones Doyma, S.L. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ediciones Doyma, S.L. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
instname_str |
Universidad del Rosario |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
reponame_str |
Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
collection |
Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1803710422145040385 |