Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America

Objective: To analyze the level of knowledge and use, and the characteristics of use, of care coordination mechanisms in public healthcare networks of six Latin America countries. Method: Cross-sectional study based on a survey using the COORDENA® questionnaire with primary and secondary care doctor...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24112
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.009
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24112
Palabra clave:
Argentina
Article
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Coordination
Cross-sectional study
Diffusion
E-mail
General practitioner
Human
Human experiment
Joint
Mexico
Patient referral
Practice guideline
Primary health care
Questionnaire
Secondary health care
Uruguay
Clinical coordination
Clinical coordination mechanisms
Integrated health care
Latin America
Primary health care
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Description
Summary:Objective: To analyze the level of knowledge and use, and the characteristics of use, of care coordination mechanisms in public healthcare networks of six Latin America countries. Method: Cross-sectional study based on a survey using the COORDENA® questionnaire with primary and secondary care doctors (348 doctors/country) of public healthcare networks in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay (May-October 2015). Analyzed variables: degree of knowledge and use of information coordination (referral/reply letter, discharge report, phone, e-mail) and of clinical management coordination (shared clinical guidelines, joint meetings) mechanisms. Descriptive analyses were conducted. Results: Knowledge of clinical information coordination mechanisms was high in both care levels and analyzed networks as was the use of referral/reply letter. There was greater variability in the use of discharge reports (from 40.0% in Brazil to 79.4% in Mexico) and, except for Argentina, a low reception reported by primary care doctors stands out (12.3% in Colombia and 55.1% in Uruguay). In contrast, knowledge of clinical management coordination mechanisms was limited, especially among secondary care doctors. It is noteworthy, however, that adherence to clinical guidelines was high (from 83.1% in Mexico to 96.8% in Brazil), while participation in joint meetings varied widely (from 23.7% in Chile to 76.2% in Brazil). The difficulties reported in the use of the mechanisms are related to structural and organizational factors. Conclusions: The limited knowledge and use of coordination mechanisms shows insufficient diffusion and implementation. Strategies to increase its use are needed, including the related factors. © 2018 SESPAS