Quality of life in patients with larynx cancer in Latin America: Comparison between laryngectomy and organ preservation protocols

The effect on quality of life (QOL) of laryngectomy and organ preservation protocols is important in decision making. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate QOL outcomes of patients with advanced laryngeal tumors who were treated with laryngectomy or organ preservation protocols in La...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23871
Acceso en línea:
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23871
Palabra clave:
Adult
Advanced cancer
Aged
Article
Cancer grading
Cancer staging
Cancer survival
Chemoradiotherapy
Clinical article
Clinical protocol
Colombia
Controlled study
Cross-sectional study
Decision making
Female
Health care quality
Human
Laryngectomy
Larynx cancer
Long term care
Male
Mood
Organ preservation
Pain
Prospective study
Quality of life
Recreation
Saliva
South and central america
Speech
Swallowing
Taste
Tracheostomy
Very elderly
Comparative study
Conservative treatment
Laryngectomy
Larynx tumor
Middle aged
Procedures
Psychology
Questionnaire
Treatment outcome
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-sectional studies
Female
Humans
Laryngeal neoplasms
Laryngectomy
Latin america
Male
Middle aged
Organ sparing treatments
Quality of life
Surveys and questionnaires
Treatment outcome
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:The effect on quality of life (QOL) of laryngectomy and organ preservation protocols is important in decision making. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate QOL outcomes of patients with advanced laryngeal tumors who were treated with laryngectomy or organ preservation protocols in Latin America. A total of 35 patients from three oncology units were enrolled. Patients with stage III/IV laryngeal cancer who were treated using organ preservation protocols or laryngectomy were assessed with the University of Washington QOL Questionnaire. The most important domains that affected QOL for both groups were speech and activity. In the laryngectomy group, the next most important domains were appearance, taste, pain, and recreation, whereas in the organ preservation group, they were saliva, recreation, mood, and swallowing. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences in the global score or the 7 days of QOL assessments before patients were interviewed. Global QOL assessments were similar when comparing laryngectomy and organ preservation protocols. © 2018 Vendome Group.