Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activity

The most important mechanism for combating infection using larval therapy depends on larval excretions and secretions (ES). The present work was aimed at evaluating Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) ES antibacterial activity in six bacterial strains (three Gram-positive and three G...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2014
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23597
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.04.018
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23597
Palabra clave:
Natural product
Antiinfective agent
Insect protein
Antimicrobial activity
Comparative study
Excretion
Incubation
Inhibitor
Insect
Secretion
Turbidity
Agar diffusion
Antibacterial activity
Article
Bacterial strain
Biological activity
Bodily secretions
Calliphoridae
Colony formation
Controlled study
Drug potency
Excretion
Gram negative bacterium
Gram positive bacterium
In vitro study
Incubation time
Larval stage
Lucilia sericata
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Nonhuman
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Sarconesiopsis magellanica
Species comparison
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Animal
Bodily secretions
Chemistry
Diptera
Drug effects
Metabolism
Microbial sensitivity test
Staphylococcus
Animals
Anti-bacterial agents
Bodily secretions
Diptera
Insect proteins
Microbial sensitivity tests
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Staphylococcus
Antibacterial activity
Excretions and secretions
Larval therapy
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Sarconesiopsis magellanica
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
id EDOCUR2_99be6f381c5c0db2990fbcfb243bdb36
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23597
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling be5e3bfd-0002-4551-8df5-71f3e76905dc-11ae314a6-f168-4186-a182-160d2a3559e2-19cab23ec-f51c-4e62-b907-6e41f3b59fd3-1b384c99d-501c-430c-a6cf-8be34f326222-179653065-1743756f9-9669-44b0-8a52-23524ddfcda2-12020-05-26T00:03:30Z2020-05-26T00:03:30Z2014The most important mechanism for combating infection using larval therapy depends on larval excretions and secretions (ES). The present work was aimed at evaluating Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) ES antibacterial activity in six bacterial strains (three Gram-positive and three Gram-negative) and comparing this to the effect of Lucilia sericata-derived ES. Antibacterial activity at 50. ?g/mL minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was observed for Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC-12228 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC-29213 strains, when the turbidimetry test involving S. magellanica ES was used; the rest of the bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC-6538, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC-10145, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC-9027 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC-27853) were inhibited at a 100. ?g/mL MIC. Twice the amount was required to inhibit the aforementioned bacteria with L. sericata-derived ES using this same technique; a similar trend was observed when the agar diffusion method was used instead. Furthermore, when the previously established MIC for each bacterial strain was used, their colonies became reduced following 1-6. h incubation with S. magellanica derived ES, whilst the reduction occurred from 2 to 6. hours with those from L. sericata. Although the MIC for each strain obtained with ciprofloxacin was lower than those established when using either blowfly derived-ES, the gradual reduction of the colonies occurred at a longer incubation time (6. h or more). The results showed that S. magellanica ES antibacterial activity was more potent and effective, compared to that of L. sericata-derived ES. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.04.0180001706Xhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23597engElsevier43No. 137Acta TropicaVol. 136Acta Tropica, ISSN:0001706X, Vol.136, No.1 (2014); pp. 37-43https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84899864500&doi=10.1016%2fj.actatropica.2014.04.018&partnerID=40&md5=4afa84719744d8bc2ff50b2a579da237Abierto (Texto Completo)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURNatural productAntiinfective agentInsect proteinAntimicrobial activityComparative studyExcretionIncubationInhibitorInsectSecretionTurbidityAgar diffusionAntibacterial activityArticleBacterial strainBiological activityBodily secretionsCalliphoridaeColony formationControlled studyDrug potencyExcretionGram negative bacteriumGram positive bacteriumIn vitro studyIncubation timeLarval stageLucilia sericataMinimum inhibitory concentrationNonhumanPseudomonas aeruginosaSarconesiopsis magellanicaSpecies comparisonStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisAnimalBodily secretionsChemistryDipteraDrug effectsMetabolismMicrobial sensitivity testStaphylococcusAnimalsAnti-bacterial agentsBodily secretionsDipteraInsect proteinsMicrobial sensitivity testsPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcusAntibacterial activityExcretions and secretionsLarval therapyMinimum inhibitory concentrationSarconesiopsis magellanicaSarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activityarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Díaz-Roa, AndreaGaona, María A.Segura, Nydia A.Suárez, DianaPatarroyo, Manuel A.Bello, Felio J.10336/23597oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/235972022-05-02 07:37:14.746903https://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activity
title Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activity
spellingShingle Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activity
Natural product
Antiinfective agent
Insect protein
Antimicrobial activity
Comparative study
Excretion
Incubation
Inhibitor
Insect
Secretion
Turbidity
Agar diffusion
Antibacterial activity
Article
Bacterial strain
Biological activity
Bodily secretions
Calliphoridae
Colony formation
Controlled study
Drug potency
Excretion
Gram negative bacterium
Gram positive bacterium
In vitro study
Incubation time
Larval stage
Lucilia sericata
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Nonhuman
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Sarconesiopsis magellanica
Species comparison
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Animal
Bodily secretions
Chemistry
Diptera
Drug effects
Metabolism
Microbial sensitivity test
Staphylococcus
Animals
Anti-bacterial agents
Bodily secretions
Diptera
Insect proteins
Microbial sensitivity tests
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Staphylococcus
Antibacterial activity
Excretions and secretions
Larval therapy
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Sarconesiopsis magellanica
title_short Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activity
title_full Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activity
title_fullStr Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activity
title_full_unstemmed Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activity
title_sort Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activity
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Natural product
Antiinfective agent
Insect protein
Antimicrobial activity
Comparative study
Excretion
Incubation
Inhibitor
Insect
Secretion
Turbidity
Agar diffusion
Antibacterial activity
Article
Bacterial strain
Biological activity
Bodily secretions
Calliphoridae
Colony formation
Controlled study
Drug potency
Excretion
Gram negative bacterium
Gram positive bacterium
In vitro study
Incubation time
Larval stage
Lucilia sericata
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Nonhuman
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Sarconesiopsis magellanica
Species comparison
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Animal
Bodily secretions
Chemistry
Diptera
Drug effects
Metabolism
Microbial sensitivity test
Staphylococcus
Animals
Anti-bacterial agents
Bodily secretions
Diptera
Insect proteins
Microbial sensitivity tests
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Staphylococcus
Antibacterial activity
Excretions and secretions
Larval therapy
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Sarconesiopsis magellanica
topic Natural product
Antiinfective agent
Insect protein
Antimicrobial activity
Comparative study
Excretion
Incubation
Inhibitor
Insect
Secretion
Turbidity
Agar diffusion
Antibacterial activity
Article
Bacterial strain
Biological activity
Bodily secretions
Calliphoridae
Colony formation
Controlled study
Drug potency
Excretion
Gram negative bacterium
Gram positive bacterium
In vitro study
Incubation time
Larval stage
Lucilia sericata
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Nonhuman
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Sarconesiopsis magellanica
Species comparison
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Animal
Bodily secretions
Chemistry
Diptera
Drug effects
Metabolism
Microbial sensitivity test
Staphylococcus
Animals
Anti-bacterial agents
Bodily secretions
Diptera
Insect proteins
Microbial sensitivity tests
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Staphylococcus
Antibacterial activity
Excretions and secretions
Larval therapy
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Sarconesiopsis magellanica
description The most important mechanism for combating infection using larval therapy depends on larval excretions and secretions (ES). The present work was aimed at evaluating Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) ES antibacterial activity in six bacterial strains (three Gram-positive and three Gram-negative) and comparing this to the effect of Lucilia sericata-derived ES. Antibacterial activity at 50. ?g/mL minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was observed for Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC-12228 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC-29213 strains, when the turbidimetry test involving S. magellanica ES was used; the rest of the bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC-6538, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC-10145, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC-9027 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC-27853) were inhibited at a 100. ?g/mL MIC. Twice the amount was required to inhibit the aforementioned bacteria with L. sericata-derived ES using this same technique; a similar trend was observed when the agar diffusion method was used instead. Furthermore, when the previously established MIC for each bacterial strain was used, their colonies became reduced following 1-6. h incubation with S. magellanica derived ES, whilst the reduction occurred from 2 to 6. hours with those from L. sericata. Although the MIC for each strain obtained with ciprofloxacin was lower than those established when using either blowfly derived-ES, the gradual reduction of the colonies occurred at a longer incubation time (6. h or more). The results showed that S. magellanica ES antibacterial activity was more potent and effective, compared to that of L. sericata-derived ES. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2014
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:03:30Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26T00:03:30Z
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.04.018
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0001706X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23597
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.04.018
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23597
identifier_str_mv 0001706X
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.citationEndPage.none.fl_str_mv 43
dc.relation.citationIssue.none.fl_str_mv No. 1
dc.relation.citationStartPage.none.fl_str_mv 37
dc.relation.citationTitle.none.fl_str_mv Acta Tropica
dc.relation.citationVolume.none.fl_str_mv Vol. 136
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Acta Tropica, ISSN:0001706X, Vol.136, No.1 (2014); pp. 37-43
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84899864500&doi=10.1016%2fj.actatropica.2014.04.018&partnerID=40&md5=4afa84719744d8bc2ff50b2a579da237
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
rights_invalid_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Elsevier
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1814167546036748288